🥸intro to psychology review

key term - Informed Consent

Definition

Informed consent is the ethical and legal requirement that a person must be fully informed about and voluntarily agree to a medical or research procedure before it can be performed. It ensures individuals have the necessary information to make an autonomous decision about their participation.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Informed consent requires researchers or clinicians to provide comprehensive information about the purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives of a study or treatment.
  2. Individuals must have the capacity to understand and voluntarily choose whether to participate, without coercion or undue influence.
  3. Informed consent is an ongoing process, not a one-time event, and participants can withdraw consent at any time.
  4. Special protections are required for vulnerable populations, such as children, prisoners, or those with diminished decision-making capacity.
  5. Failure to obtain proper informed consent can constitute a violation of research ethics and legal standards.

Review Questions

  • Explain the key elements of informed consent and how they help protect the autonomy of research participants or patients.
    • The key elements of informed consent include providing comprehensive information about the study or treatment, ensuring the individual has the capacity to understand and voluntarily choose whether to participate, and obtaining their agreement without coercion or undue influence. These elements work together to uphold the ethical principle of respect for autonomy, allowing participants to make an informed, self-determined decision about their involvement. By requiring researchers and clinicians to disclose relevant information and obtain voluntary agreement, informed consent empowers individuals to exercise control over their own bodies and healthcare decisions.
  • Describe the role of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the informed consent process for research studies.
    • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a critical role in reviewing and approving research protocols to ensure they adequately protect the rights and welfare of human participants. As part of this process, IRBs carefully evaluate the informed consent procedures to verify that researchers are providing complete and comprehensible information, that participants have the capacity to consent, and that there are no undue influences or coercion. IRBs may require modifications to the informed consent form or process to align with ethical standards. Their oversight helps safeguard the autonomy of research participants and promotes the principle of beneficence by minimizing risks and maximizing benefits.
  • Analyze how the concept of informed consent applies differently in medical treatment versus research contexts, and the implications for protecting participant or patient rights.
    • While the core principles of informed consent are similar in medical treatment and research, there are some key differences in how they are applied. In a medical treatment context, the focus is on ensuring the patient has a clear understanding of the proposed treatment, its risks and benefits, and alternative options, so they can make an autonomous decision about their care. In research, the informed consent process must also address the scientific purpose of the study, the procedures involved, and the voluntary nature of participation, as research often carries greater uncertainties and potential risks than standard medical care. Additionally, research involving human participants requires oversight by an Institutional Review Board to ensure the informed consent process and other protections are adequate. These distinctions highlight how informed consent is a critical safeguard for upholding the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice in both medical and research settings.

"Informed Consent" also found in: