scoresvideos

🥸intro to psychology review

key term - Euthanasia

Citation:

Definition

Euthanasia is the practice of ending a terminally ill person's life to relieve them of their suffering. It is a controversial and complex issue that intersects with medical ethics, personal autonomy, and end-of-life decision-making.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Euthanasia can be voluntary (the person requests it), non-voluntary (the person is unable to consent), or involuntary (the person does not consent).
  2. The legality of euthanasia varies widely around the world, with some countries and U.S. states allowing it under certain circumstances, while others consider it a criminal act.
  3. Proponents of euthanasia argue that it can alleviate unbearable suffering and respect an individual's right to self-determination, while opponents cite concerns about the potential for abuse and the sanctity of life.
  4. Palliative care is often presented as an alternative to euthanasia, as it aims to provide comfort and support to terminally ill patients without actively ending their lives.
  5. The decision to pursue euthanasia can be highly emotionally charged and can have significant impacts on the patient, their family, and their healthcare providers.

Review Questions

  • Describe the different types of euthanasia and the ethical considerations associated with each.
    • The three main types of euthanasia are voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when a terminally ill person requests to have their life ended to alleviate suffering. This is generally seen as the most ethically justifiable form, as it respects the individual's autonomy. Non-voluntary euthanasia involves ending the life of a person who is unable to consent, such as someone in a persistent vegetative state. This raises concerns about the potential for abuse and the right to life. Involuntary euthanasia, where a person is killed without their consent, is widely considered unethical and is illegal in most jurisdictions.
  • Analyze the role of palliative care as an alternative to euthanasia in the context of end-of-life decision-making.
    • Palliative care is often presented as an alternative to euthanasia, as it aims to provide comfort and support to terminally ill patients without actively ending their lives. Palliative care focuses on managing pain, symptoms, and emotional distress, with the goal of improving quality of life rather than hastening death. Proponents argue that high-quality palliative care can alleviate the suffering that often motivates requests for euthanasia, making it unnecessary. However, critics contend that palliative care may not be able to adequately address all forms of suffering, and that euthanasia should remain an option for those who are experiencing intolerable pain or loss of dignity. The debate between euthanasia and palliative care highlights the complex ethical considerations surrounding end-of-life decision-making.
  • Evaluate the societal and legal implications of legalizing euthanasia, considering both the potential benefits and risks.
    • The legalization of euthanasia is a highly contentious and complex issue, with significant societal and legal implications. Proponents argue that it can respect individual autonomy and alleviate unbearable suffering, while opponents cite concerns about the potential for abuse and the sanctity of life. Legalization would likely require the establishment of robust safeguards and oversight mechanisms to ensure that euthanasia is only performed in accordance with strict criteria and with the full consent of the individual. However, even with such safeguards, there are concerns that legalization could lead to the devaluation of human life, coercion of vulnerable individuals, and the erosion of the medical profession's ethical principles. Ultimately, the decision to legalize euthanasia involves weighing the potential benefits of respecting personal autonomy and relieving suffering against the risks of abuse and the broader societal impact. This complex issue requires careful deliberation and input from various stakeholders, including medical professionals, ethicists, policymakers, and the general public.