๐Ÿค”intro to philosophy review

Wilhelm Dilthey

Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team โ€ข Last updated September 2025

Definition

Wilhelm Dilthey was a prominent German philosopher, psychologist, and hermeneutic theorist who made significant contributions to the development of Continental philosophy. His work challenged the Enlightenment's emphasis on universal, objective knowledge by advocating for a more contextual and interpretive approach to understanding human experience and the social world.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Dilthey argued that the human sciences (Geisteswissenschaften), such as history, psychology, and sociology, require a different methodological approach than the natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften).
  2. He emphasized the importance of understanding the historical and cultural context in which human experiences and actions occur, rather than seeking universal, ahistorical laws.
  3. Dilthey's concept of Verstehen, or empathetic understanding, was central to his critique of the Enlightenment's emphasis on objective, causal explanations of human behavior.
  4. He believed that the human sciences should focus on the interpretation and reconstruction of the meaning and significance of human life, rather than the prediction and control of natural phenomena.
  5. Dilthey's ideas influenced the development of phenomenology, hermeneutics, and other interpretive approaches in Continental philosophy, which challenged the dominance of positivist and empiricist methodologies.

Review Questions

  • Explain how Dilthey's concept of Verstehen challenged the Enlightenment's approach to understanding the human world.
    • Dilthey's concept of Verstehen, or empathetic understanding, challenged the Enlightenment's emphasis on objective, causal explanations of human behavior. He argued that the human sciences (Geisteswissenschaften) require a different methodological approach than the natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften), focusing on the interpretation and reconstruction of the meaning and significance of human life, rather than the prediction and control of natural phenomena. Dilthey believed that understanding the historical and cultural context in which human experiences and actions occur is crucial for comprehending the subjective, interpretive nature of the human world.
  • Describe how Dilthey's ideas influenced the development of Continental philosophy and its challenge to Enlightenment theories.
    • Dilthey's work had a significant impact on the development of Continental philosophy, particularly in the areas of phenomenology, hermeneutics, and life-philosophy (Lebensphilosophie). His emphasis on the importance of lived experience, intuition, and the uniqueness of individual human existence challenged the Enlightenment's focus on universal, objective knowledge. Dilthey's concept of Verstehen, or empathetic understanding, and his belief that the human sciences require a different methodological approach than the natural sciences, laid the groundwork for interpretive and contextual approaches to understanding the human world. These ideas influenced later thinkers in the Continental tradition, who continued to question the dominance of positivist and empiricist methodologies in favor of more hermeneutical and phenomenological perspectives.
  • Analyze how Dilthey's critique of the Enlightenment's approach to the human sciences contributed to the development of Continental philosophy's challenge to universal, objective theories of knowledge.
    • Dilthey's critique of the Enlightenment's approach to the human sciences was a pivotal contribution to the development of Continental philosophy's challenge to universal, objective theories of knowledge. By arguing that the human sciences (Geisteswissenschaften) require a different methodological approach than the natural sciences (Naturwissenschaften), Dilthey undermined the Enlightenment's assumption that a single, universal method could be applied to all domains of inquiry. His emphasis on the importance of historical and cultural context, as well as the interpretive and subjective nature of human experience, laid the groundwork for later Continental thinkers to question the Enlightenment's emphasis on objective, causal explanations. Dilthey's concept of Verstehen, or empathetic understanding, in particular, highlighted the limitations of positivist and empiricist approaches in comprehending the meaning and significance of human life. This critique of the Enlightenment's universal theories of knowledge was a crucial step in the development of Continental philosophy's more contextual, interpretive, and phenomenological approaches to understanding the human world.