Game Theory

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Satisficing

from class:

Game Theory

Definition

Satisficing is a decision-making strategy that aims for a satisfactory or adequate result, rather than the optimal one. It reflects the idea that individuals often settle for a choice that meets their minimum requirements due to constraints like limited information, time, or cognitive resources. This approach recognizes the challenges in achieving perfect rationality and highlights how people navigate complex decisions by choosing options that are 'good enough' instead of the best possible.

congrats on reading the definition of satisficing. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Satisficing contrasts with the traditional view of decision-making that assumes individuals always strive for optimal choices.
  2. The term was coined by Herbert Simon, who emphasized that real-world decisions are often made with incomplete information.
  3. In situations involving uncertainty, satisficing allows individuals to make timely decisions without exhaustive searching for all possible options.
  4. Cognitive limitations can lead to satisficing, as people may become overwhelmed by too many choices or complex information.
  5. Satisficing can lead to satisfactory outcomes, but it may also result in missed opportunities for better alternatives that were not fully considered.

Review Questions

  • How does satisficing relate to the concept of bounded rationality in decision-making?
    • Satisficing is a direct response to bounded rationality, which highlights the limitations individuals face when making decisions. Since people operate under constraints such as limited information and cognitive resources, they often resort to satisficing as a practical approach. This means they choose an option that meets their needs rather than searching endlessly for the best one, acknowledging their cognitive limitations while still making effective choices.
  • Discuss the impact of satisficing on strategic decision-making and how it might affect outcomes in competitive scenarios.
    • In strategic decision-making, satisficing can significantly impact the choices leaders make under competitive pressure. When faced with time constraints or uncertainty, decision-makers may choose satisfactory solutions rather than optimal ones, potentially leading to subpar results. This tendency could give competitors an advantage if they are able to pursue more thorough analyses and uncover superior strategies, demonstrating how satisficing can shape the dynamics of competition.
  • Evaluate the long-term implications of relying on satisficing in uncertain environments and its effect on learning within games.
    • Relying on satisficing in uncertain environments can have complex long-term implications. While it allows for quicker decision-making, it may hinder deep learning and adaptation within games since players might overlook better strategies or fail to analyze past outcomes thoroughly. As players consistently choose satisfactory options without deeper exploration, they may become stuck in suboptimal patterns of play, missing opportunities for growth and improvement in their strategic thinking over time.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides