Batson v. Kentucky

Definition

Batson v. Kentucky is a landmark Supreme Court decision that established a legal framework to address racial discrimination in the jury selection process. The case established that the discriminatory use of peremptory challenges to exclude potential jurors based on their race violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The Batson v. Kentucky decision established a three-step process for addressing claims of racial discrimination in jury selection.
2. Under Batson, a defendant must first make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner.
3. If the defendant establishes a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to provide a race-neutral explanation for the challenged peremptory strikes.
4. The trial court must then determine whether the defendant has proven purposeful racial discrimination in the use of the peremptory challenges.
5. The Batson framework has been extended to apply to gender-based discrimination in jury selection as well.

Review Questions

• Explain the legal framework established by the Batson v. Kentucky decision and how it addresses racial discrimination in jury selection.
  • The Batson v. Kentucky decision established a three-step process to address claims of racial discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges during jury selection. First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor has exercised peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner. If the defendant establishes this, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to provide a race-neutral explanation for the challenged peremptory strikes. Finally, the trial court must determine whether the defendant has proven purposeful racial discrimination in the use of the peremptory challenges. This framework aims to prevent the discriminatory exclusion of potential jurors based on their race, which would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
• Analyze how the Batson decision has been applied and expanded over time to address other forms of discrimination in jury selection.
  • The Batson framework has been extended beyond its original application to racial discrimination in jury selection. The Supreme Court has held that the Batson principles also apply to gender-based discrimination in the use of peremptory challenges. Additionally, some state courts have expanded Batson to prohibit discrimination based on other characteristics, such as religion or sexual orientation. The Batson decision has thus served as a significant precedent in protecting the right to a fair and impartial jury by preventing the discriminatory exclusion of potential jurors based on their membership in protected groups.
• Evaluate the ongoing significance and impact of the Batson v. Kentucky decision on the criminal justice system and the protection of constitutional rights.
  • The Batson v. Kentucky decision remains highly significant in the criminal justice system, as it continues to play a crucial role in safeguarding the fundamental right to a fair trial and the equal protection of the laws. By establishing a framework to address racial discrimination in jury selection, Batson has helped to mitigate the historical and systemic exclusion of minority groups from juries, which can have far-reaching consequences on the fairness and legitimacy of the criminal justice process. The Batson decision has also been expanded to address other forms of discrimination, further reinforcing the principle of equal protection and the importance of diverse and impartial juries. As such, Batson v. Kentucky stands as a landmark Supreme Court decision that has had a lasting impact on the protection of constitutional rights and the pursuit of greater equity within the criminal justice system.

Related terms

Peremptory Challenge: A peremptory challenge is a limited number of challenges a lawyer can use to dismiss a potential juror without having to provide a reason for the dismissal.

Equal Protection Clause:

The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Discriminatory Intent: Discriminatory intent refers to the purpose of treating someone differently based on their race, gender, or other protected characteristics.