study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Ostracism

from class:

Early World Civilizations

Definition

Ostracism was a political practice used in ancient Athens where citizens could vote to exile an individual for a period of ten years. This process served as a method to protect the democratic system by removing those deemed a threat to the state, such as potential tyrants or individuals who had amassed excessive power. By allowing citizens to have a direct say in governance, ostracism reinforced the principles of democracy and civic participation in Athenian society.

congrats on reading the definition of Ostracism. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Ostracism was introduced in Athens around 487 BCE as a way to prevent any individual from gaining too much power and potentially establishing a tyranny.
  2. The process involved writing the name of the person to be ostracized on a piece of pottery known as an 'ostracon,' which led to the term 'ostracism.'
  3. A minimum of 6,000 votes was required for an ostracism to be enacted, showing that it was a significant decision requiring broad consensus.
  4. While ostracism could remove influential figures from Athens, it did not confiscate their property or deny them their rights; they could return after the ten years.
  5. Prominent figures such as Themistocles and Aristides were subjects of ostracism, reflecting the political tensions and rivalries of the time.

Review Questions

  • How did ostracism contribute to the protection of democracy in ancient Athens?
    • Ostracism served as a safeguard for Athenian democracy by allowing citizens to remove individuals who posed a threat to the political stability of the city-state. By enabling the populace to vote on exile, it ensured that power remained distributed among many rather than concentrated in one person, reducing the risk of tyranny. This practice promoted civic engagement as citizens actively participated in maintaining their democratic values.
  • Discuss the implications of ostracism for individuals who were subjected to this practice in terms of their political influence and public perception.
    • Being subjected to ostracism could significantly impact an individual's political influence and how they were viewed by society. While it did not strip away their wealth or rights, being exiled for ten years meant losing their ability to participate in governance and public life, which could tarnish their reputation. Additionally, ostracized individuals might be seen as threats to democracy or unpopular figures, shaping how history remembers them.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of ostracism as a tool for maintaining democratic ideals in ancient Athens compared to other forms of governance.
    • Ostracism was effective in maintaining Athenian democratic ideals by empowering citizens to take direct action against potential tyrants or overly powerful individuals. Unlike autocratic forms of governance where decisions are made unilaterally, ostracism required collective participation and consensus among citizens. However, its effectiveness varied depending on political climate and public sentiment; it could also be misused for personal vendettas or political rivalry. This dual nature highlights both its strengths and weaknesses as a democratic tool.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides