key term - Terry v. Ohio

Definition

Terry v. Ohio is a landmark Supreme Court case decided in 1968 that established the legal standard for 'stop and frisk' procedures by law enforcement. This ruling allows police officers to stop and briefly detain individuals they reasonably suspect are involved in criminal activity and to perform a limited search for weapons, balancing the need for public safety with the protection of individual rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. The case arose when a police officer observed two men acting suspiciously and believed they were planning a robbery, which led him to stop and search them.
2. The Supreme Court ruled that police could conduct a pat-down search based on reasonable suspicion, which is less stringent than probable cause required for an arrest.
3. The decision in Terry v. Ohio is significant because it set a precedent for police interactions with suspects, allowing them to ensure their safety during encounters.
4. This ruling has been the basis for many legal challenges regarding the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk practices in various jurisdictions across the United States.
5. Critics argue that the ruling can lead to racial profiling and violations of civil liberties, raising concerns about its impact on communities of color.

Review Questions

• How did Terry v. Ohio change the legal landscape regarding police stops and searches?
  • Terry v. Ohio fundamentally changed how law enforcement interacts with individuals by establishing that officers can stop and frisk someone based on reasonable suspicion rather than requiring probable cause for an arrest. This ruling allowed police to act swiftly in potentially dangerous situations while also outlining the scope of searches that can be conducted, thus balancing public safety needs with individual rights against unreasonable searches.
• Discuss the implications of the Terry v. Ohio decision on the Fourth Amendment rights of individuals.
  • The implications of Terry v. Ohio on Fourth Amendment rights are significant, as it introduced the concept of reasonable suspicion as a standard for temporary detainment and search. While it enables police to address public safety concerns more effectively, it raises questions about how this standard is applied in practice. The decision has sparked ongoing debates about civil liberties, particularly regarding how stop-and-frisk policies can disproportionately affect minority communities.
• Evaluate the ongoing debate surrounding Terry v. Ohio in relation to contemporary issues of policing and civil rights.
  • The ongoing debate surrounding Terry v. Ohio focuses on its impact on modern policing practices, especially concerning issues like racial profiling and community trust in law enforcement. Critics argue that the ruling has led to an increase in unjustified stops and has contributed to systemic discrimination within policing. Proponents assert that it provides necessary tools for police to ensure public safety. The challenge lies in balancing effective law enforcement while safeguarding civil rights, highlighting a critical tension in American society today.

Related terms

Stop and Frisk: A police practice where officers stop a person based on reasonable suspicion and may perform a limited pat-down for weapons.

Reasonable Suspicion: A legal standard used in criminal procedure that requires specific and articulable facts suggesting that a person may be involved in criminal activity.

Fourth Amendment:

An amendment to the U.S. Constitution that protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.