Performance Task 2 (PT 2)

Definition

Performance Task 2 (PT 2) is a structured assessment that requires students to investigate a specific issue, develop an argument, and present their findings through written and oral communication. This task emphasizes critical thinking, research skills, and the ability to synthesize information from various sources, fostering deeper understanding and engagement with real-world problems.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. PT 2 requires students to engage in a thorough research process, including gathering data from credible sources and evaluating the relevance of the information.
2. Students must develop a clear thesis statement that articulates their argument and supports it with well-organized evidence throughout their presentation.
3. Collaboration and peer feedback are essential components, as they help students refine their arguments and enhance the quality of their work.
4. The final product for PT 2 includes both a written report and an oral presentation, showcasing students' ability to communicate their ideas effectively.
5. Assessment criteria for PT 2 focus on content understanding, argument development, use of evidence, and overall presentation skills.

Review Questions

• How does Performance Task 2 challenge students to enhance their research and argumentation skills?
  • Performance Task 2 pushes students to strengthen their research abilities by requiring them to formulate a focused research question and gather relevant data from credible sources. As they craft their arguments, they must critically analyze this information and synthesize it into a coherent thesis. This process not only develops their argumentation skills but also fosters deeper engagement with real-world issues, preparing them for complex problem-solving.
• What role does peer feedback play in the execution of Performance Task 2, and how does it impact the final outcome?
  • Peer feedback is crucial in Performance Task 2 as it allows students to receive constructive criticism on their arguments and presentation style before the final submission. This collaborative approach helps them identify areas for improvement, clarify their points, and strengthen their overall argument. By incorporating feedback from classmates, students can refine their work, leading to a more polished final product that effectively communicates their ideas.
• Evaluate the importance of citations in Performance Task 2 and how they contribute to academic integrity and credibility.
  • Citations are essential in Performance Task 2 because they uphold academic integrity by giving proper credit to original authors and sources used during research. This practice enhances the credibility of students' arguments by demonstrating that they have engaged with existing literature and built upon established knowledge. By accurately citing their sources, students not only avoid plagiarism but also provide readers with pathways to verify information, thus fostering transparency and trust in their work.

Related terms

Research Question:

A clear, focused question that guides the investigation process in order to address a specific issue or topic.

Argumentation: The process of formulating and presenting a reasoned case to support a particular position or viewpoint based on evidence.

Citations: References to sources used in the research, providing credit to original authors and allowing readers to locate the materials.