Skip to main content

Hexaamminecopper(II) ion

Hexaamminecopper(II) ion is the coordination complex [Cu(NH3)6]2+, where a Cu2+ ion is bonded to six ammonia ligands. In Intro to Chemistry, it is a model for ligand bonding, coordination number, and metal complex geometry.

Last updated July 2026•Fiveable Content Team

What is Hexaamminecopper(II) ion?

Hexaamminecopper(II) ion is the coordination complex [Cu(NH3)6]2+, made when a copper(II) ion is surrounded by six ammonia molecules acting as ligands. In Intro to Chemistry, it shows up as a clean example of how transition metals bind to molecules through coordination bonds rather than ordinary one-to-one covalent bonding.

The name tells you a lot. “Hexaammine” means six ammonia ligands, and “copper(II)” means the copper center has a +2 charge. Because ammonia is neutral, the overall charge stays 2+ even though six ligands are attached. That makes this ion useful when you are practicing how to read formulas and connect a complex name to the charges inside it.

The copper in this complex is the central metal, and each NH3 ligand donates a lone pair to the metal. That makes ammonia a sigma donor. The bond is often called coordinate covalent because both electrons in the bonding pair come from the ligand. In class, this is one of the easiest ways to see that a covalent bond can form without each atom contributing one electron.

Copper(II) is a d9 metal ion, which is a big reason this complex gets so much attention. d9 transition metals often distort from a perfect octahedral shape because of electronic effects, so the geometry is not just about counting ligands. You may see this discussed alongside octahedral arrangements or square-planar tendencies, depending on how the topic is being simplified.

A useful way to think about the ion is as a visual model of coordination chemistry. The metal center is the hub, the ligands are the spokes, and the arrangement depends on charge, electron count, and ligand behavior. If you can tell why six ammonia ligands can surround Cu2+, you are already doing the kind of reasoning Intro to Chemistry asks for when it moves from simple formulas to bonding in complex ions.

Why Hexaamminecopper(II) ion matters in Intro to Chemistry

Hexaamminecopper(II) ion is one of the first coordination complexes that makes transition-metal chemistry feel concrete instead of abstract. It gives you a real example of a metal ion, a ligand, and a coordination number all in one formula, so you can practice the exact skills used for naming, structure, and bonding questions.

It also helps you separate three ideas that students often blend together: the identity of the metal ion, the identity of the ligands, and the charge on the whole complex. In [Cu(NH3)6]2+, the ligands are neutral, but the ion is still charged because copper is 2+. That kind of bookkeeping matters any time you are balancing complex ions in reactions or writing formulas from names.

This term also connects to geometry. Once you know copper is bonded to six ligands, you can start thinking about the likely arrangement in space and how d-electron configuration can affect that shape. That is the bridge from basic bonding to transition-metal behavior, which shows up again in coordination compounds, solutions, and qualitative chemistry labs.

In short, this ion is a compact example of how chemistry uses charge, electron pairs, and structure together. If you can explain why it forms and how it is classified, you are using the same reasoning that shows up in later questions about other complexes and metal-ligand systems.

Keep studying Intro to Chemistry Unit 19

Official unit cheatsheet

open one-pager

How Hexaamminecopper(II) ion connects across the course

Coordination Complex

Hexaamminecopper(II) ion is a coordination complex, so it is a direct example of the larger category. The copper ion is the central metal, and the ammonia molecules are ligands attached through coordinate bonds. When you recognize this term as a coordination complex, you can start asking the next questions: what is the metal, what are the ligands, what is the charge, and what geometry fits the structure.

Ligand

Ammonia is the ligand in this ion, which means it donates a lone pair to copper. That makes the term a good reminder that ligands are not just “attached molecules,” they are electron-pair donors. If you know how a ligand behaves, you can predict why complexes form and why different ligands can change a metal ion’s shape or reactivity.

Coordination Number

The coordination number of hexaamminecopper(II) ion is 6 because six ammonia ligands are bonded to the copper center. This number is one of the first things you count when describing a complex. It helps you connect the formula to a likely 3D arrangement, which is especially useful when the course moves into geometry and transition-metal structure.

[Cu(NH3)4]2+

This related copper complex is a nearby comparison because it has the same metal and the same type of ligand, but fewer ammonia molecules. Comparing the two helps you see how the number of ligands changes the coordination environment around copper. It also trains you to read complex-ion formulas carefully instead of assuming every copper-ammonia complex has the same structure.

Is Hexaamminecopper(II) ion on the Intro to Chemistry exam?

A quiz question may ask you to identify the formula from the name, find the coordination number, or explain why ammonia is a ligand in this complex. You might also be asked to compare it with another copper-ammonia ion and decide which one has more ligands or a different charge balance. On problem sets, the usual move is to count ligands, track charges, and name the central metal correctly.

If your class uses lab work, this term can show up when a copper solution changes color after ammonia is added, because the formation of a complex ion often changes the appearance of the mixture. In that setting, you are not just memorizing a name. You are explaining what happened at the particle level when a ligand bound to the metal center.

Hexaamminecopper(II) ion vs [Cu(NH3)4]2+

These two copper-ammonia complexes are easy to mix up because both contain Cu2+ and NH3. The difference is the number of ligands, six versus four, which changes the coordination number and can change the structure you picture. If a question asks for hexaamminecopper(II), look for six ammonia ligands, not four.

Key things to remember about Hexaamminecopper(II) ion

  • Hexaamminecopper(II) ion is the complex [Cu(NH3)6]2+, where a Cu2+ center is bonded to six ammonia ligands.

  • The ammonia molecules are ligands because each one donates a lone pair to the copper ion.

  • The coordination number is 6, so this ion is a standard example of a six-ligand transition-metal complex.

  • Copper(II) is a d9 metal ion, which is why the structure is a useful case for discussing transition-metal geometry.

  • You use this term to practice naming, charge tracking, ligand counting, and basic coordination chemistry.

Frequently asked questions about Hexaamminecopper(II) ion

What is hexaamminecopper(II) ion in Intro to Chemistry?

It is the coordination complex [Cu(NH3)6]2+, made of a copper(II) ion bound to six ammonia ligands. In Intro to Chemistry, it is used as a model for coordination bonding, ligand donation, and coordination number.

Why is ammonia a ligand in hexaamminecopper(II) ion?

Ammonia has a lone pair on nitrogen that it can donate to the copper ion. That electron donation is what makes it a ligand. Because ammonia is neutral, it changes the structure of the complex without changing the charge contribution from the ligand itself.

Is hexaamminecopper(II) ion octahedral?

It is usually discussed as having six ligands around the copper center, which points to an octahedral coordination environment. Copper(II) is d9, so the structure can be distorted rather than perfectly symmetric. In class, the main idea is the six-ligand arrangement.

How is [Cu(NH3)6]2+ different from [Cu(NH3)4]2+?

They are both copper-ammonia coordination complexes, but they have different numbers of ligands. Hexaamminecopper(II) has six ammonia molecules, while [Cu(NH3)4]2+ has four. That difference changes the coordination number and the way you describe the metal’s environment.