9.5 Appeal

Appeals in criminal law provide crucial safeguards against wrongful convictions and legal errors. They allow defendants to challenge court decisions, ensuring fair trials and protecting constitutional rights. This process is essential for maintaining justice and integrity in the legal system.

Appellate courts review cases for various grounds, including errors of law, abuse of discretion, and insufficient evidence. The outcomes can range from affirming judgments to reversing decisions or remanding cases for further proceedings. Appeals play a vital role in shaping case law and upholding constitutional protections.

Types of appeals

• Appeals are legal proceedings that allow a party to challenge a lower court's decision in a higher court
• The purpose of appeals is to correct errors, ensure fair trials, and protect constitutional rights

Direct vs collateral appeals

Top images from around the web for Direct vs collateral appeals

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 4: How Public Law Structures Politics – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An Orientation to ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Liberties: How are basic freedoms secured? – United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 4: How Public Law Structures Politics – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An Orientation to ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Direct vs collateral appeals

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 4: How Public Law Structures Politics – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An Orientation to ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Civil Liberties: How are basic freedoms secured? – United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Dual Court System – American Government (2e) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 4: How Public Law Structures Politics – Politics, Power, and Purpose: An Orientation to ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Direct appeals are challenges to a conviction or sentence that are filed directly with the appellate court after the trial court's judgment
• Direct appeals must be based on issues that were raised and preserved in the trial court record
• Collateral appeals are separate civil proceedings that challenge the validity of a conviction or sentence based on constitutional violations or other grounds not part of the trial record
• Collateral appeals include habeas corpus petitions and motions for post-conviction relief filed after the direct appeal process is complete

Interlocutory vs final judgment appeals

• Interlocutory appeals are filed during an ongoing trial to challenge a specific ruling or order before the final judgment is entered
• Interlocutory appeals are generally limited to exceptional circumstances where the ruling would cause irreparable harm or cannot be effectively reviewed after the trial
• Final judgment appeals are filed after the trial court has entered a final judgment disposing of all issues in the case
• Most appeals are final judgment appeals challenging the conviction, sentence, or both

Grounds for appeal

• Grounds for appeal are the specific legal reasons or arguments raised by the appellant to challenge the lower court's decision
• The grounds for appeal must be based on preserved errors in the trial court record or constitutional violations

Errors of law

• Errors of law occur when the trial court misinterprets or misapplies a statute, precedent, or constitutional provision
• Examples of errors of law include improper jury instructions, admitting inadmissible evidence, or failing to dismiss charges based on insufficient evidence
• Errors of law are reviewed de novo, meaning the appellate court considers the issue independently without deference to the trial court's decision

Abuse of discretion

• Abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court makes a ruling that is arbitrary, unreasonable, or not supported by the facts or law
• Examples of abuse of discretion include imposing an excessive sentence, denying a continuance, or limiting cross-examination
• Abuse of discretion is reviewed for reasonableness, meaning the appellate court will defer to the trial court's decision unless it is clearly erroneous or prejudicial

Insufficient evidence

• Insufficient evidence means the prosecution failed to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt based on the evidence presented at trial
• Challenges based on insufficient evidence argue that no reasonable jury could have found the defendant guilty based on the evidence
• Insufficient evidence is reviewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, meaning the appellate court will uphold the conviction if any rational jury could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

Newly discovered evidence

• Newly discovered evidence is evidence that was not known or available at the time of trial and could not have been discovered with due diligence
• To warrant a new trial, newly discovered evidence must be material, not merely cumulative, and likely to change the outcome of the trial
• Newly discovered evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion, meaning the appellate court will defer to the trial court's decision unless it is clearly erroneous or prejudicial

Ineffective assistance of counsel

• Ineffective assistance of counsel means the defendant's attorney failed to provide competent representation and this deficient performance prejudiced the defense
• Examples of ineffective assistance include failing to investigate, not objecting to inadmissible evidence, or not presenting mitigating evidence at sentencing
• Ineffective assistance is reviewed under a two-part test: (1) whether the attorney's performance was deficient based on an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) whether this deficient performance prejudiced the defense and affected the outcome of the trial

Appellate procedure

• Appellate procedure refers to the rules and process for filing and deciding appeals in criminal cases
• The appellate procedure is governed by state and federal statutes, court rules, and constitutional provisions

Notice of appeal

• The notice of appeal is a written document filed by the appellant to initiate the appeal process
• The notice of appeal must be filed within a specific time period after the judgment, usually 30 to 60 days
• The notice of appeal must specify the party filing the appeal, the judgment being appealed, and the court to which the appeal is being taken

Record on appeal

• The record on appeal is the official trial court record that the appellate court reviews to decide the appeal
• The record on appeal includes the trial transcripts, pleadings, motions, exhibits, and other documents filed in the trial court
• The appellant is responsible for designating the parts of the record to be included on appeal and ensuring the record is complete and accurate

Briefs and arguments

• Appellate briefs are written arguments submitted by the parties to explain their positions and persuade the court to rule in their favor
• The appellant's brief is filed first, followed by the appellee's brief and the appellant's reply brief
• Oral arguments may be scheduled where the parties appear before the appellate court to answer questions and present their arguments in person

Standard of review

• The standard of review is the legal standard the appellate court applies to review the trial court's decision on each issue raised on appeal
• The standard of review determines how much deference the appellate court gives to the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law
• Common standards of review include de novo (independent review), clear error (factual findings), abuse of discretion (discretionary rulings), and plain error (unpreserved errors)

Appellate court decisions

• After reviewing the briefs, record, and arguments, the appellate court issues a written decision explaining its ruling and reasoning on each issue
• The appellate court may affirm (uphold), reverse (overturn), or modify (change) the trial court's judgment, or remand (send back) the case for further proceedings
• The appellate court's decision is binding on the parties and establishes precedent for future cases unless overturned by a higher court

Possible outcomes

• The possible outcomes of an appeal depend on the specific issues raised and the appellate court's ruling on each issue
• The appellate court may dispose of the appeal in various ways that affect the finality and enforceability of the judgment

Affirming the judgment

• Affirming the judgment means the appellate court upholds the trial court's decision and agrees with its findings and conclusions
• When a judgment is affirmed, it becomes final and enforceable, and the appellant has no further recourse unless they seek review by a higher court

Reversing the judgment

• Reversing the judgment means the appellate court overturns the trial court's decision and finds in favor of the appellant on one or more issues
• When a judgment is reversed, it is vacated and no longer has legal effect, and the case may be remanded for further proceedings consistent with the appellate court's ruling

Remanding for further proceedings

• Remanding for further proceedings means the appellate court sends the case back to the trial court with instructions to take specific actions or consider additional issues
• The trial court must follow the appellate court's instructions on remand, which may include holding a new trial, resentencing, or conducting further hearings

Modifying the judgment

• Modifying the judgment means the appellate court changes or corrects part of the trial court's decision without entirely reversing or affirming it
• The appellate court may modify the judgment to correct errors, reduce a sentence, or change the conviction to a lesser-included offense

Post-conviction relief

• Post-conviction relief refers to legal remedies available to challenge a conviction or sentence after the direct appeal process is complete
• Post-conviction remedies are typically based on constitutional violations, newly discovered evidence, or other grounds not raised on direct appeal

Habeas corpus petitions

• Habeas corpus petitions are civil proceedings that challenge the legality of a person's detention or imprisonment based on constitutional violations
• State prisoners may file federal habeas petitions after exhausting state court remedies, while federal prisoners may file motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
• Habeas relief may be granted if the petitioner's conviction or sentence violates the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States

Motions for new trial

• Motions for new trial are requests to vacate the judgment and grant a new trial based on specific grounds such as newly discovered evidence, juror misconduct, or prejudicial errors
• Motions for new trial must be filed within a specific time period after the verdict or finding of guilt, usually 14 to 30 days
• The trial court has discretion to grant or deny a motion for new trial based on the strength of the evidence and the likelihood of a different outcome

Sentence modifications

• Sentence modifications are requests to reduce or change a sentence based on legal errors, changes in the law, or other mitigating factors
• Sentence modifications may be sought through motions for resentencing, petitions for sentence reduction, or appeals of the sentence
• The court has discretion to modify a sentence within the limits of the law and based on the specific circumstances of the case

Clemency and pardons

• Clemency and pardons are executive actions that reduce or eliminate the punishment for a crime after the conviction is final
• Clemency may include commuting a sentence to a lesser term, granting parole or early release, or reducing a sentence to time served
• Pardons are acts of forgiveness that restore some or all of the rights and privileges lost due to the conviction
• The power to grant clemency and pardons is vested in the executive branch, such as the governor or president, and is not subject to judicial review

Impact of appeals

• Appeals have significant impacts on the criminal justice system, both for individual cases and for the development of the law
• The appellate process serves important functions in ensuring fair trials, correcting errors, and protecting constitutional rights

Finality of judgments

• Appeals affect the finality of judgments by allowing challenges to convictions and sentences after the trial is complete
• The finality of judgments is important for the efficiency and integrity of the criminal justice system, as it allows cases to be resolved and punishments to be carried out
• The balance between finality and fairness is reflected in the time limits and procedural requirements for filing appeals and post-conviction remedies

Development of case law

• Appellate decisions establish precedent and shape the interpretation and application of criminal laws and constitutional provisions
• Published appellate opinions are binding on lower courts and guide future cases involving similar issues or facts
• The development of case law through appeals allows the law to evolve and adapt to changing social and legal norms

Ensuring fair trials

• Appeals provide a mechanism for correcting errors and ensuring that defendants receive fair trials in accordance with constitutional guarantees
• Appellate review helps to prevent wrongful convictions, overly harsh sentences, and other miscarriages of justice
• The right to appeal is an essential component of due process and the adversarial system of justice

Protecting constitutional rights

• Appeals play a crucial role in protecting the constitutional rights of criminal defendants, such as the right to counsel, the right to a jury trial, and the protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
• Appellate courts have the power to strike down unconstitutional laws, suppress illegally obtained evidence, and reverse convictions based on constitutional violations
• The appellate process helps to enforce the supremacy of the Constitution and maintain the rule of law in the criminal justice system