🛒principles of microeconomics review
11.2 Regulating Anticompetitive Behavior
Last Updated on June 25, 2024
Monopolies wield significant power in markets, often employing tactics to maintain their dominance. These strategies, like tying and bundling, can limit competition and consumer choice. Understanding these practices is crucial for grasping how monopolies operate.
The legality of monopolistic practices isn't always clear-cut. Some tactics may be legal if they have legitimate business reasons, while others are illegal if they harm competition. Real-world examples, like Microsoft's antitrust case, show how these issues play out in the business world.
Monopolies and Anticompetitive Behavior
Restrictive Practices
Top images from around the web for Restrictive Practices
Reading: Illustrating Monopoly Profits | Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
Principles of Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
Impacts of Monopoly on Efficiency | Boundless Economics View original
Is this image relevant?
Reading: Illustrating Monopoly Profits | Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
Principles of Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Restrictive Practices
Reading: Illustrating Monopoly Profits | Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
Principles of Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
Impacts of Monopoly on Efficiency | Boundless Economics View original
Is this image relevant?
Reading: Illustrating Monopoly Profits | Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
Principles of Microeconomics View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Monopolies engage in restrictive practices to maintain market power and limit competition
- Tying requires customers to purchase a second product to buy the first product (software company requiring hardware purchase to use software)
- Bundling offers multiple products together as a package, often at a lower price than purchasing separately (cable company offering TV, internet, and phone services at a discounted rate)
- Exclusive dealing requires buyers or suppliers to only deal with the monopoly and not competitors (beverage company requiring restaurants to only sell its products)
- These practices make it difficult for new competitors to enter the market and limit consumer choice
Legality
- Tying, bundling, and exclusive dealing can be legal or illegal depending on circumstances
- Legal tying and bundling occur when tied or bundled products are closely related with legitimate business justifications (car manufacturer including tires with new car purchase)
- Illegal tying and bundling are used to maintain or extend a monopoly and limit competition (dominant software company requiring web browser purchase to use operating system)
- Legal exclusive dealing involves short-term arrangements that do not significantly harm competition (small retailer agreeing to exclusively sell a particular brand for a limited time)
- Illegal exclusive dealing involves long-term arrangements that substantially foreclose competition (dominant pharmaceutical company requiring pharmacies to only sell its drugs)
Real-World Examples
- Microsoft antitrust case (1998)
- Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer web browser with Windows operating system
- Allegedly used this strategy to maintain operating system monopoly and extend it to web browser market
- Courts found Microsoft's practices anticompetitive and ordered behavior change
- Apple App Store policies
- Apple requires developers to use its in-app purchase system for digital goods and services, which includes a 30% commission
- Some argue this abuses Apple's market power in iOS app market, limiting competition and innovation
- Others claim it legitimately maintains platform quality and security
- Amazon's treatment of third-party sellers
- Amazon sells its own products alongside those of third-party sellers on its platform
- Some third-party sellers allege Amazon uses their sales data to create competing products and prioritize its own listings
- This could potentially abuse Amazon's e-commerce market power, limiting competition and harming small businesses
Key Terms to Review (25)
Monopoly: A monopoly is a market structure in which a single seller (or a group of sellers acting as one) controls the entire supply of a particular good or service, with no close substitutes available. This allows the monopolist to exercise significant influence over the price and output of the product, often leading to higher prices and lower production compared to a competitive market.
Price Discrimination: Price discrimination is the practice of charging different prices for the same product or service to different customers or groups of customers based on their willingness or ability to pay. It allows a firm to maximize profits by segmenting the market and capturing consumer surplus.
Barriers to Entry: Barriers to entry are obstacles or factors that make it difficult for new firms to enter a particular market or industry. These barriers can give existing firms a competitive advantage and allow them to maintain higher prices and profits in the long run.
Oligopoly: An oligopoly is a market structure characterized by a small number of firms that collectively dominate the market. In an oligopoly, the actions of one firm can significantly impact the others, leading to interdependent decision-making and strategic behavior.
Predatory Pricing: Predatory pricing is a pricing strategy in which a company sets its prices at an extremely low level, often below its own cost of production, in order to drive competitors out of the market and establish a monopoly. This practice is considered anticompetitive and is often regulated by antitrust laws.
Market Power: Market power refers to the ability of a firm or group of firms to influence and control the market by setting prices, restricting output, and limiting competition. It is a measure of a firm's ability to charge prices above the competitive level and earn economic profits in the long run.
Market Concentration: Market concentration refers to the degree to which a small number of firms or companies dominate a particular industry or market. It measures the level of competition within a market and can have significant implications for consumer welfare, firm behavior, and regulatory policies.
Collusion: Collusion is an agreement between two or more parties, often competitors, to work together to influence or manipulate a market for their own benefit. It typically involves coordinating actions, such as setting prices or dividing up market share, in order to restrict competition and increase profits.
Vertical Merger: A vertical merger is a type of corporate integration where a company acquires or merges with a business that is part of its supply chain, either upstream (suppliers) or downstream (distributors or retailers). This allows the merged entity to have greater control over the production and distribution process.
Tying: Tying refers to the practice of a company with market power requiring customers to purchase one product or service (the tying product) as a condition of obtaining another product or service (the tied product). This is considered an anticompetitive behavior that can limit consumer choice and stifle competition in the market.
Horizontal Merger: A horizontal merger is a type of corporate merger where two companies that operate in the same industry and provide the same or similar products or services combine to form a single, larger entity. This type of merger occurs between competitors and is aimed at increasing market share, reducing competition, and achieving economies of scale.
Monopolization: Monopolization is the process by which a single firm gains control over a market, eliminating competition and establishing itself as the sole provider of a particular good or service. This allows the monopolist to set prices and output levels without the constraints of a competitive market.
Cartel: A cartel is an organization formed by several firms or countries that jointly control the production, distribution, and pricing of a product or service in order to maximize profits and reduce competition. Cartels are a form of anticompetitive behavior that can have significant impacts on markets and consumers.
Clayton Act: The Clayton Act is a federal law enacted in 1914 that aims to prevent anticompetitive business practices and corporate mergers that substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. It serves as a key piece of legislation for regulating corporate mergers and anticompetitive behavior in the United States.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index: The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is a measure of market concentration that assesses the degree of competition in an industry. It is calculated by squaring the market share of each firm in the market and then summing the resulting numbers. The HHI provides insight into the level of market competition and is used in the context of corporate mergers and regulating anticompetitive behavior.
Antitrust: Antitrust refers to the laws and regulations that promote or maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive business practices. It aims to ensure a fair and competitive marketplace for businesses and consumers.
Conglomerate Merger: A conglomerate merger is a type of corporate merger where two or more companies from different industries or unrelated business lines combine to form a new, diversified entity. This strategy allows the merged company to expand into new markets and potentially benefit from economies of scale and scope.
Bundling: Bundling refers to the practice of offering multiple products or services together as a single package, often at a discounted price compared to purchasing the items individually. This strategy is commonly used by businesses to increase sales, customer loyalty, and market share.
Sherman Antitrust Act: The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark piece of United States antitrust legislation that was enacted in 1890. It aims to promote competition and prohibit monopolistic business practices that restrain trade or commerce.
Rule of Reason: The rule of reason is a legal doctrine used to evaluate whether a business practice or agreement violates antitrust laws. It involves a case-by-case analysis to determine if the anticompetitive effects of a practice outweigh its procompetitive benefits.
Price Fixing: Price fixing is an anticompetitive practice where competitors in the same market agree to set prices for their products or services at a certain level, rather than allowing prices to be determined by free market forces of supply and demand. This practice reduces competition and often leads to higher prices for consumers.
Federal Trade Commission Act: The Federal Trade Commission Act is a U.S. federal law that established the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and empowered it to regulate anticompetitive business practices and corporate mergers. It serves as a key piece of legislation in the context of corporate mergers and regulating anticompetitive behavior.
Consumer Welfare: Consumer welfare refers to the overall well-being and satisfaction experienced by consumers in an economic market. It is a measure of the benefits that consumers derive from the consumption of goods and services, taking into account factors such as price, quality, and choice.
Merger Guidelines: Merger guidelines are a set of policies and regulations established by antitrust authorities to evaluate the competitive effects of proposed mergers and acquisitions between companies. These guidelines provide a framework for assessing whether a merger is likely to substantially lessen competition or create a monopoly in a given market.
Per Se Rule: The per se rule is a legal doctrine in antitrust law that categorizes certain business practices as inherently anticompetitive and unlawful, without the need to prove actual harm to competition. This rule establishes a bright-line test for determining the legality of specific types of conduct.