scoresvideos
Intro to Linguistics
Table of Contents
Unit 7 Overview: Language Use in Context: Pragmatics
7.1 Speech acts and conversational implicature
7.2 Deixis and reference
7.3 Politeness and face theory

Politeness and face theory explore how we manage our public image in social interactions. These concepts help us understand why we use certain language strategies to maintain harmony, show respect, and avoid offending others.

Cultural norms significantly influence politeness practices across societies. From workplace emails to social media comments, understanding face theory can improve our communication skills and help navigate diverse social situations more effectively.

Understanding Politeness and Face Theory

Positive and negative face

  • Face shapes public self-image every person claims for themselves
    • Positive face drives desire for appreciation and approval from others fostering belonging and acceptance (compliments, recognition)
    • Negative face fuels desire for autonomy and freedom from imposition promoting personal space and independent decision-making (respecting boundaries)
  • Politeness theory framework developed by Brown and Levinson (1978) manages face in social interactions
    • All communicative acts potentially threaten face requiring strategic language use

Linguistic strategies for face

  • Face-saving strategies maintain or enhance face
    • Positive politeness appeals to positive face through compliments, inclusive language ("we" instead of "you"), showing interest in others' needs
    • Negative politeness minimizes imposition on negative face using indirect requests, formal language, titles, apologies for intrusions
  • Face-threatening acts (FTAs) potentially damage face
    • Direct criticism, disagreement, unsolicited requests, orders, or advice
  • Mitigation techniques soften potential face threats
    • Softeners and downtoners ("perhaps," "maybe") reduce impact
    • Off-record strategies use hints or ambiguous statements
    • Repair strategies employ apologies or explanations to restore face

Cultural norms in politeness

  • Cultural variations influence face concerns
    • Individualistic cultures emphasize negative face (personal autonomy)
    • Collectivistic cultures focus more on positive face (group harmony)
  • Communication styles affect politeness strategies
    • High-context cultures favor indirect communication (Japan)
    • Low-context cultures tend towards more direct communication (USA)
  • Power distance impacts politeness norms
    • Hierarchical societies use more formal politeness strategies (Korea)
    • Egalitarian societies place less emphasis on status-based politeness (Scandinavian countries)
  • Culture-specific politeness markers reflect social norms
    • Honorifics in Japanese and Korean show respect and social distance
    • T-V distinction in Romance languages (tu/vous in French) indicates formality or intimacy

Real-world applications of politeness theory

  • Workplace communication employs face-saving strategies
    • Email etiquette uses opening and closing formulas to maintain professionalism
    • Meeting dynamics involve turn-taking and avoiding interruptions to respect others' face
    • Giving feedback requires constructive criticism techniques to preserve positive face
  • Social media interactions necessitate online face management
    • Public vs. private spaces require different levels of politeness
    • Emojis and emoticons serve as digital politeness markers
    • Comment sections demand careful face management during disagreements
  • Cross-cultural business communication adapts politeness strategies
    • International clients require culturally appropriate communication styles
    • Negotiation approaches vary based on cultural norms (direct vs. indirect)
  • Customer service interactions balance face needs and problem-solving
    • Scripts and formulaic politeness maintain professionalism
    • Complaint handling requires preserving both customer and company face

Key Terms to Review (18)

Power Dynamics: Power dynamics refer to the ways in which power is negotiated and expressed in social interactions. This concept is crucial when discussing how individuals and groups maintain their social standing and influence others through various forms of communication, especially within contexts that involve politeness and face management. Understanding power dynamics allows us to see how social hierarchies affect communication strategies and the preservation of self-image in interpersonal exchanges.
Linguistic relativity: Linguistic relativity is the idea that the structure and vocabulary of a language influence how its speakers perceive and think about the world. This concept suggests that different languages may lead to different ways of understanding reality, affecting communication, social interactions, and cultural expressions.
Cross-cultural communication: Cross-cultural communication refers to the process of exchanging, negotiating, and mediating meanings across different cultural contexts. It involves understanding how cultural backgrounds influence communication styles, behaviors, and interpretations, which can impact interpersonal interactions. This concept emphasizes the importance of recognizing cultural differences to facilitate effective dialogue and avoid misunderstandings.
Indirectness: Indirectness refers to a communication style that conveys meaning or intent in a subtle or implied manner, rather than stating it directly. This approach often helps to maintain social harmony and respect by allowing the speaker to navigate sensitive topics without causing offense, making it a key component of politeness strategies in interpersonal communication.
Contextualization: Contextualization refers to the process of placing information, language, or behavior within a specific social, cultural, or situational context to give it meaning. This practice helps individuals understand the subtleties of communication, especially when it involves politeness and face dynamics, allowing for appropriate responses based on the social environment and the relationships between speakers.
Request: A request is a speech act in which one person seeks something from another, typically asking for help, permission, or information. Requests are shaped by social norms and contexts, as they can reveal the dynamics of politeness and power between the individuals involved. The way a request is framed can influence how it is perceived and responded to, making it crucial to understand its role in communication.
Apology: An apology is a communicative act where an individual expresses regret or remorse for an offense or mistake, often aimed at repairing social harmony. This act plays a crucial role in maintaining politeness and managing 'face' in interpersonal interactions, as it acknowledges a disruption and seeks to restore relationships between individuals.
Cultural Relativism: Cultural relativism is the principle of understanding and evaluating cultures based on their own values and beliefs, rather than through the lens of one's own culture. This concept emphasizes the importance of context in interpreting cultural practices and social norms, suggesting that one should avoid ethnocentrism—the belief that one's own culture is superior to others.
Penelope Brown: Penelope Brown is a prominent linguist known for her work on politeness theory and the concept of 'face' in communication. Her research, particularly in collaboration with Stephen Levinson, has significantly contributed to understanding how individuals manage social relationships through language, emphasizing the importance of politeness strategies in different cultures and contexts.
Stephen Levinson: Stephen Levinson is a prominent linguist known for his significant contributions to the study of pragmatics, particularly in the areas of politeness and face theory. His work emphasizes how language functions in social contexts, focusing on the ways individuals manage their social identities through interaction. Levinson's theories explore how cultural norms shape communication strategies, impacting the dynamics of politeness and the concept of 'face' in conversations.
Positive Politeness: Positive politeness refers to strategies used in communication that aim to enhance the listener's self-esteem and convey friendliness. This approach is centered around affirming the positive aspects of the listener's identity, creating a sense of camaraderie, and reducing social distance between speakers. By recognizing shared values and interests, positive politeness helps foster a cooperative atmosphere in interactions.
Negative politeness: Negative politeness refers to a communicative strategy aimed at minimizing imposition on the listener while still conveying respect and consideration. It often involves the use of indirect language, hedging, and apologetic expressions to avoid threatening the listener's personal autonomy or 'face'. This strategy is particularly significant in social interactions where maintaining a harmonious relationship is important.
Face-saving: Face-saving refers to the strategies and actions individuals employ to maintain their social dignity and self-esteem in communication. This concept is closely linked to how people navigate social interactions, especially when they face criticism, embarrassment, or a loss of status. By employing face-saving techniques, individuals strive to protect their own face or that of others, promoting harmony and reducing conflict in conversations.
Erving Goffman: Erving Goffman was a Canadian sociologist and playwright, known for his work on the concept of 'face' in social interactions, which refers to the image of self that a person presents in social contexts. His theories emphasize how individuals manage their social identities and interactions, often focusing on the delicate balance of maintaining 'face' while navigating various social situations.
Face-threatening act: A face-threatening act is an utterance or action that challenges the self-esteem or social identity of an individual within a conversation. This concept is crucial for understanding how people communicate and navigate social interactions, particularly when it comes to maintaining politeness and avoiding conflict. It plays a significant role in speech acts, where the intention behind a statement can either reinforce or undermine someone's face, as well as in face theory, which emphasizes the importance of preserving the 'face' or social persona of individuals during communication.
Hierarchical relationships: Hierarchical relationships refer to the structured organization of elements within a system, where components are ranked or ordered in levels of importance or authority. This concept is crucial in understanding how different parts of language interact and influence each other, especially in the formation of phrases and the negotiation of social interactions. These relationships help clarify roles and responsibilities in both linguistic structures and social contexts, emphasizing how layers of meaning can affect communication dynamics.
Implicature: Implicature refers to what is suggested in an utterance, even though it is not explicitly stated. It plays a crucial role in communication by conveying additional meaning through context, tone, and shared knowledge between speakers and listeners. Understanding implicature helps unpack the subtleties of conversations, including how speakers navigate politeness, the implications of sentence meanings, and how language can be processed computationally.
Speech Acts: Speech acts are communicative actions that individuals perform while speaking, where the utterance itself carries meaning and intention beyond just conveying information. These acts can include requests, promises, apologies, and assertions, showcasing how language is used not only to share information but also to perform functions that affect the relationship between speakers and listeners. Understanding speech acts allows for deeper insights into linguistic analysis and interactions involving politeness and social dynamics.