Archaeologists use various techniques to determine the age of artifacts and sites. Stratigraphy, seriation, typology, and cross-dating help establish relative chronologies without exact dates. These methods rely on layering, style changes, and comparisons between sites.
Understanding these principles is crucial for piecing together the past. By analyzing how objects and layers relate to each other, archaeologists can reconstruct sequences of events and cultural changes over time, even without precise dates.
Principles and Techniques of Relative Dating
Principles of stratigraphy in archaeology
- Stratigraphy studies layered deposits (strata) to establish relative chronology
- Law of Superposition: in undisturbed sequences, older layers deposited first and overlain by younger layers
- Allows establishing relative age of artifacts and features within a site (pottery, tools)
- Stratigraphic relationships determine sequence of events and changes over time
- Intrusive features (pits, burials) cutting through older layers are younger than disturbed layers
- Fill of intrusive features younger than feature itself and surrounding strata
- Harris Matrix diagrams stratigraphic relationships and relative chronology of a site
- Visualizes and analyzes complex stratigraphic sequences (Pompeii, Çatalhöyük)
Seriation for chronological sequencing
- Seriation arranges artifacts in chronological sequence based on changes in attributes over time
- Assumes artifact styles and characteristics change gradually and continuously in particular direction (pottery decoration, tool shape)
- Frequency seriation arranges artifact types based on relative frequencies or proportions in different assemblages
- Relies on idea that certain artifact types become more or less common over time
- Contextual seriation considers stratigraphic and spatial context of artifacts within a site
- Refines chronological sequences and identifies contemporaneous assemblages
- Seriation particularly useful for dating artifacts and sites lacking absolute dating methods (prehistoric sites, early civilizations)
Typology in relative dating
- Typology classifies artifacts into distinct types based on physical attributes
- Assumes artifacts of same type are contemporaneous and reflect specific time period or cultural tradition (projectile points, ceramics)
- Typological sequences establish relative chronologies and trace cultural changes over time
- Requires understanding of regional and temporal variations in artifact styles
- Limitations of typology in relative dating:
- Typological sequences may not always reflect true chronological order
- Some artifact types can persist for long periods or be reused
- Regional variations and cultural differences complicate use of typology across different sites and areas
- Typology alone cannot provide absolute dates, requires additional dating methods for more precise chronologies
Cross-dating for site correlation
- Cross-dating compares and correlates archaeological finds from different sites using multiple dating methods and evidence
- Establishes synchronicity and contemporaneity of artifacts and features across a region (trade goods, architectural styles)
- Stratigraphic cross-dating correlates strata and features between sites based on relative position and associated artifacts
- Requires careful comparison of stratigraphic sequences and diagnostic artifacts
- Typological cross-dating compares artifact types and styles across sites to establish relative chronologies
- Assumes similar artifact types are contemporaneous and reflect cultural connections or influences
- Other cross-dating methods include absolute dating techniques (radiocarbon dating) and historical sources (written records, coins) to anchor relative chronologies
- Provides independent age estimates to correlate and refine relative dating sequences across sites (Mayan sites, Roman provinces)