Fiveable

🗿Intro to Anthropology Unit 7 Review

QR code for Intro to Anthropology practice questions

7.7 Industrialism and Postmodernity

7.7 Industrialism and Postmodernity

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
🗿Intro to Anthropology
Unit & Topic Study Guides

Industrialism and Its Impact

Industrialism didn't just change how things were made. It restructured entire societies, from family life to global power dynamics. Understanding these shifts is central to economic anthropology because they explain how production, value, and labor became organized in ways we still live with today. This section covers the rise of industrial economies, the cultural transformations they triggered, and how industrialism connected to colonialism and global inequality.

Development of Industrialism

Industrialism emerged in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, starting in Great Britain and spreading to France, Germany, and the United States. It replaced small-scale, home-based production with a fundamentally different system built on several interlocking features:

  • Mechanization replaced manual labor with machines like steam engines and power looms, dramatically increasing output.
  • The factory system centralized production in large facilities, pulling work away from cottage industries and artisanal workshops.
  • Division of labor broke production into specialized tasks. Instead of one person making a whole product, each worker repeated a single step, as on an assembly line. This boosted efficiency but also changed the experience of work itself.
  • Urbanization followed directly from factory work. People migrated from rural areas to cities like Manchester and London, which grew rapidly and often chaotically.
  • Capitalism provided the economic framework: private ownership of the means of production, profit as the driving motive, and accumulation of capital as the primary goal.

These features reinforced each other. Factories needed concentrated labor, which drove urbanization, which created new markets for mass-produced goods, which generated more capital for investment.

Cultural Shifts in Industrial Societies

Industrialism reshaped daily life and social relationships, not just production methods.

  • Family structure and gender roles shifted as the nuclear family became more common. Women increasingly entered wage labor, particularly in textile mills, though often under exploitative conditions.
  • Consumerism grew alongside mass production. As goods became cheaper and more abundant, consumption itself became a cultural activity. Department stores and advertising emerged to drive demand.
  • Secularization marked a decline in religious authority over public life, with scientific and rational thought gaining influence in education, governance, and everyday decision-making.
  • Individualism placed new emphasis on personal achievement, autonomy, and individual rights, often at the expense of collective or community-oriented values.
  • Class stratification hardened into distinct social classes based on economic position. A growing middle class emerged, but so did a widening gap between the wealthy (the bourgeoisie, who owned the means of production) and the working class (the proletariat, who sold their labor). Karl Marx's analysis of this divide remains a foundational concept in anthropology and sociology.
Development of industrialism, Inglaterra - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre

Industrialism and Colonialism in Global Economics

Industrialism and colonialism were deeply connected. European industrial powers needed raw materials like cotton and rubber, plus markets to sell their manufactured goods. Colonial expansion provided both.

  • Colonial trade networks grew through the exploitation of colonized peoples' resources and labor. The transatlantic slave trade is one of the most devastating examples.
  • Unequal economic relationships developed between colonizers and colonized. Colonial economies were structured to benefit the colonizing power, following mercantilist logic where colonies exported cheap raw materials and imported expensive finished goods.
  • This pattern of economic dependency persisted long after formal colonial rule ended. Many post-colonial societies still rely heavily on exporting raw materials while importing manufactured products, a dynamic sometimes called neocolonialism.
  • Globalization intensified economic interdependence between nations, but the power dynamics established during the colonial era continue to shape who benefits most from global trade.

Modernity and Its Discontents

Development of industrialism, History of capitalism - Wikipedia

Colonial Legacies in Contemporary Societies

Colonial rule didn't simply end when countries gained independence. Its effects are structural and ongoing.

  • Economic inequalities between former colonizers and colonized persist, reinforced by global institutions like the World Bank and IMF, whose lending conditions have often favored wealthy nations' interests.
  • Political instability in many post-colonial societies traces back to arbitrary borders drawn by colonial powers, which grouped together or divided ethnic and cultural communities without regard for existing social structures. The Rwandan genocide and the India-Pakistan partition are stark examples.
  • Cultural imperialism displaced traditional knowledge systems as colonial powers imposed Western languages, religions, and educational models. Many of these impositions remain embedded in post-colonial institutions.
  • Environmental degradation continues as former colonies face pressure to extract natural resources for global markets, often at great ecological cost. Oil extraction in Nigeria and deforestation in Brazil illustrate this pattern.

Modernity vs. Alternative Modernity Concepts

Modernity, in its conventional sense, is associated with Western Enlightenment values: rationality, progress, individualism, and secularism. This framing assumes a single, linear path of development that all societies should follow toward a Western ideal.

Alternative modernities challenge that assumption. They recognize that societies can modernize in ways shaped by their own cultural, historical, and political contexts, without simply copying the Western model.

  • Japanese modernity blended Western technology with traditional cultural values, particularly during the Meiji Restoration (1868), when Japan rapidly industrialized while maintaining distinct social institutions.
  • Islamic modernity reconciles Islamic principles with modern economic and political structures. Islamic banking, for instance, operates within global financial systems while adhering to religious prohibitions on interest.

Anthropological perspectives on modernity tend to:

  • Emphasize the lived experiences and agency of individuals and communities rather than abstract models of development
  • Explore tensions between global forces and local practices, a dynamic sometimes called glocalization
  • Recognize that modern identities are often plural and hybrid, as seen in diaspora communities that blend cultural traditions from multiple places
  • Examine how postmodernism questions grand narratives of progress and highlights the fragmented, contested nature of cultural meaning

Post-Industrial Transformations

Post-industrial societies have shifted from manufacturing-based economies to service-oriented ones. Instead of factory production driving growth, knowledge, information, and services now dominate.

  • The information age emerged with digital technologies, creating entire industries built around data, software, and communication networks.
  • Neoliberalism became the dominant economic philosophy in many post-industrial societies, promoting free-market policies, privatization of public services, and reduced government intervention. From an anthropological perspective, neoliberalism doesn't just describe economic policy; it reshapes how people understand their own value and responsibility.
  • Work itself has changed. The gig economy, remote work, and short-term contracts have replaced the stable, long-term employment that characterized the industrial era. These shifts raise important questions about labor rights, economic security, and what "work" even means in the 21st century.