6.6 Bribery

Bribery, a serious criminal offense, involves exchanging something valuable to influence someone in a position of trust. It requires corrupt intent, a quid pro quo arrangement, a valuable item, and an official act within the recipient's duties. Understanding these elements is crucial for grasping the complexities of this crime.

Bribery differs from extortion, which involves coercion. Public and private sector bribery are treated differently, with public officials facing harsher penalties. Defenses against bribery charges include entrapment, duress, and lack of corrupt intent. Various laws and penalties exist at federal, state, and international levels to combat this pervasive issue.

Elements of bribery

• Bribery is a criminal offense that involves offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving something of value to influence the actions of a person in a position of trust or authority
• The key elements that must be proven to establish bribery include corrupt intent, a quid pro quo arrangement, a thing of value above a certain threshold, and an official act within the scope of the bribe recipient's duties

Corrupt intent requirement

Top images from around the web for Corrupt intent requirement

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Anti-bribery and Corruption Policies in International Sports Governing Bodies View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Corrupt intent requirement

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Anti-bribery and Corruption Policies in International Sports Governing Bodies View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | The Effects of General System Justification on Corruption Perception and Intent ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Corrupt intent refers to the mental state of the bribe offeror or recipient, who must act with the purpose of wrongfully influencing the recipient's actions
• The intent must be specific to the particular official act sought, rather than a general attempt to curry favor
• Corrupt intent can be inferred from circumstantial evidence, such as the timing and manner of the bribe offer or payment
• The bribe offeror and recipient need not have the same corrupt intent, as long as both parties act with the purpose of influencing or being influenced

Quid pro quo arrangement

• A quid pro quo (Latin for "something for something") arrangement is an essential element of bribery, involving an exchange of something of value for a specific official act
• The quid pro quo need not be explicit, but there must be a clear understanding between the parties that the thing of value is being offered or solicited in exchange for the official act
• The official act need not actually be performed for bribery to occur, as long as the quid pro quo arrangement exists
• The quid pro quo can involve a series of payments or favors over time, rather than a single transaction

Thing of value threshold

• The thing of value offered or solicited in a bribe must exceed a certain monetary threshold, which varies by jurisdiction and statute
• The thing of value can be tangible (money, gifts) or intangible (services, favors), as long as it has some subjective value to the recipient
• The value is measured from the perspective of the bribe offeror or recipient, not fair market value
• The thing of value need not be paid or received directly by the public official, but can be directed to third parties such as family members or campaign funds

Official act scope

• The official act sought in a bribery scheme must be within the scope of the recipient's official duties or influence
• Official acts can include legislative votes, executive decisions, judicial rulings, or administrative actions
• The act need not be a final decision, but can include intermediate steps such as making recommendations or exerting influence on other officials
• The scope of official acts is interpreted broadly, but does not include purely ministerial functions or actions unrelated to the recipient's position of authority

Bribery vs extortion

• Bribery and extortion are related but distinct offenses that involve the misuse of authority for personal gain
• The key difference is that bribery involves a voluntary exchange, while extortion involves coercion or threats to induce the payment or action

Coercion distinction

• In bribery, the thing of value is offered or solicited freely, without any coercion or pressure from the recipient
• In extortion, the payment is made under duress, in response to an explicit or implicit threat of harm or negative consequences
• The coercion can be physical, economic, or political in nature, and need not be carried out for extortion to occur
• Some statutes, such as the Hobbs Act, blur the line between bribery and extortion by prohibiting the obtaining of property "under color of official right"

Hobbs Act considerations

• The Hobbs Act is a federal statute that prohibits extortion and robbery affecting interstate commerce, including by public officials
• The Act defines extortion as "the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right"
• The "under color of official right" provision has been interpreted to cover bribery by public officials, even without any coercion or threats
• The Hobbs Act has been used to prosecute a wide range of public corruption cases, including those involving state and local officials

Public vs private bribery

• Bribery laws typically distinguish between public sector and private sector bribery, with the former receiving greater attention and penalties
• Public sector bribery involves the corruption of government officials or employees, while private sector bribery occurs between private parties in a commercial context

Public official definition

• Public sector bribery laws apply to a broad range of government officials and employees, including elected representatives, appointed officials, judges, and law enforcement officers
• The definition of "public official" varies by jurisdiction and statute, but generally includes anyone who exercises governmental authority or performs official functions
• Some laws also cover candidates for public office, as well as family members and close associates of public officials
• Public officials are held to a higher standard of integrity and are subject to more severe penalties for bribery offenses

Private commercial bribery

• Private sector bribery, also known as commercial bribery, involves the corruption of private individuals or entities in a business context
• Examples include bribing a purchasing agent to steer contracts, a bank employee to approve loans, or a sports referee to influence game outcomes
• Private bribery is typically prosecuted under general fraud or theft statutes, rather than specific bribery laws
• Some jurisdictions have enacted specific commercial bribery statutes to address this conduct, particularly in industries with heightened corruption risks (construction, healthcare)

Defenses to bribery charges

• Defendants charged with bribery may raise various defenses to contest the elements of the offense or to justify their conduct
• Common defenses include entrapment, duress or coercion, and lack of corrupt intent

Entrapment considerations

• Entrapment is a defense that applies when a government agent induces a defendant to commit a crime that he or she was not predisposed to commit
• In the bribery context, entrapment may arise when an undercover agent offers a bribe to a public official who was not otherwise inclined to accept it
• The key issue is whether the defendant was predisposed to commit the offense, or whether the government's conduct created the criminal intent
• Entrapment is an affirmative defense that the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence

Duress or coercion

• Duress or coercion is a defense that applies when a defendant commits a crime under threat of imminent harm or force
• In the bribery context, duress may arise when a public official is threatened with violence or economic harm unless he or she accepts a bribe
• The threat must be sufficient to overcome the will of a reasonable person in the defendant's situation
• Duress is typically a complete defense that negates the mens rea element of the offense

Lack of corrupt intent

• Lack of corrupt intent is a defense that challenges the mental state element of bribery
• A defendant may argue that he or she did not act with the specific intent to influence or be influenced by the thing of value exchanged
• This defense may arise in cases involving campaign contributions, gifts, or other exchanges that have a plausible legitimate purpose
• The burden is on the prosecution to prove corrupt intent beyond a reasonable doubt

Statutory provisions

• Bribery is prohibited by a patchwork of federal, state, and international laws that vary in scope and application
• The most significant bribery statutes in the U.S. include the federal bribery statute (18 U.S.C. § 201), the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and various state bribery laws

Federal bribery statutes

• The federal bribery statute (18 U.S.C. § 201) prohibits the bribery of federal public officials, witnesses, and jurors
• The statute applies to anyone who "directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value" to a covered recipient with intent to influence an official act
• The statute also prohibits federal officials from soliciting or accepting bribes, and covers former officials and candidates for federal office
• Violations are punishable by up to 15 years in prison and fines of up to three times the monetary equivalent of the bribe

State bribery laws

• Each state has its own bribery laws that prohibit the corruption of state and local officials, with penalties and coverage varying by jurisdiction
• Some states have separate statutes for different categories of officials (legislators, judges, law enforcement), while others have a single comprehensive bribery law
• State bribery laws may also cover commercial bribery and other corrupt practices beyond the public sector
• Penalties range from misdemeanors to felonies, with prison terms up to 10 years or more and fines up to $100,000 or more

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

• The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is a federal law that prohibits U.S. companies and individuals from bribing foreign government officials to obtain or retain business
• The FCPA applies to any U.S. business, citizen, or resident, as well as foreign companies that issue securities in the U.S. or engage in corrupt acts while in U.S. territory
• The FCPA prohibits the payment or offer of "anything of value" to a foreign official, political party, or candidate to influence any official act or decision
• Violations are punishable by up to 5 years in prison for individuals and fines up to $2 million for companies, as well as civil penalties and debarment from government contracts

Penalties for bribery

• Bribery is a serious offense that carries significant criminal and civil penalties, as well as collateral consequences for offenders
• The specific penalties for bribery depend on the jurisdiction, the statute violated, and the circumstances of the offense

Fines and imprisonment

• Most bribery statutes provide for both fines and imprisonment as potential penalties, with the severity depending on the amount of the bribe and the offender's role
• Federal bribery offenses typically carry maximum prison terms of 15 years for individuals, while state penalties range from a few years to over a decade
• Fines for individuals can range from a few thousand dollars to over $250,000, while organizational fines can reach millions of dollars
• In addition to criminal fines, offenders may be subject to civil penalties, restitution, and forfeiture of the bribe proceeds or property involved

Sentencing guidelines factors

• In federal cases, judges consider the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines in determining the appropriate sentence within the statutory range
• The Guidelines provide a complex formula that considers various factors, such as the amount of the bribe, the defendant's role, the level of public trust involved, and any obstruction of justice
• Judges may depart from the Guidelines based on aggravating or mitigating circumstances, such as the defendant's cooperation with authorities or lack of criminal history
• Some states have similar sentencing guidelines or mandatory minimum sentences for bribery offenses

Collateral consequences

• In addition to fines and imprisonment, bribery convictions can carry significant collateral consequences for offenders
• Public officials convicted of bribery are typically removed from office and may be barred from future government employment or elected positions
• Professionals such as lawyers or accountants may face disciplinary action or loss of licenses
• Companies convicted of bribery may be debarred from government contracts or face other business restrictions
• Reputational damage and civil liability are also common consequences of bribery scandals

Bribery investigations

• Bribery is often difficult to detect and prove, as it typically occurs in secret and may involve complex financial transactions or relationships
• Law enforcement agencies use various investigative techniques to uncover and prosecute bribery schemes

Undercover operations

• Undercover operations involve the use of agents or informants who pose as participants in a bribery scheme to gather evidence and build a case
• Undercover agents may offer or solicit bribes, record conversations, or participate in meetings to document the corrupt conduct
• Undercover operations require careful planning and oversight to avoid entrapment or other legal challenges
• Sting operations, where agents create a fictitious bribery scenario to test a target's willingness to participate, are a common undercover tactic

Wiretapping and surveillance

• Wiretapping involves the interception of electronic communications, such as phone calls or emails, to gather evidence of bribery
• Law enforcement must obtain a court order based on probable cause to conduct wiretapping, which is governed by strict legal requirements
• Other forms of surveillance, such as physical observation or GPS tracking, may also be used to monitor suspects and gather evidence
• Wiretapping and surveillance can provide valuable evidence of the quid pro quo arrangement and corrupt intent in bribery cases

Immunity and plea bargains

• Prosecutors may offer immunity or plea bargains to lower-level participants in a bribery scheme in exchange for their cooperation and testimony against higher-level targets
• Immunity can be formal (granted by a judge) or informal (promised by a prosecutor), and may be full (protecting against all charges) or limited (protecting only against the use of the witness's statements)
• Plea bargains typically involve the defendant pleading guilty to a lesser charge or receiving a reduced sentence in exchange for cooperation
• Cooperating witnesses can provide valuable insider information and corroboration in bribery cases, but their credibility may be challenged based on their own involvement in the scheme

Political corruption cases

• Bribery is a common form of political corruption that undermines public trust and the integrity of government institutions
• High-profile cases of political bribery often involve elected officials, lobbyists, or campaign donors, and may intersect with other corruption offenses

Campaign finance violations

• Campaign finance laws regulate the raising and spending of money in political campaigns, including limits on contributions and requirements for disclosure
• Bribery in the campaign finance context may involve the exchange of campaign contributions for official acts, or the use of campaign funds for personal enrichment
• Recent Supreme Court decisions, such as Citizens United v. FEC, have loosened restrictions on corporate and union campaign spending, raising concerns about the influence of money in politics
• Prosecutions for campaign finance violations often hinge on whether a contribution was made with corrupt intent to influence official action

Honest services fraud

• Honest services fraud is a federal offense that prohibits schemes to deprive the public of the intangible right to the honest services of a public official or employee
• The statute has been used to prosecute various forms of public corruption, including bribery, kickbacks, and self-dealing
• In Skilling v. United States, the Supreme Court narrowed the scope of honest services fraud to cases involving bribery or kickbacks, rather than undisclosed conflicts of interest
• Honest services fraud cases often involve complex financial transactions and relationships, and may be charged in addition to or instead of bribery offenses

High-profile scandals

• Political corruption scandals involving bribery have rocked governments at all levels, from local officials to national leaders
• Examples include the Abscam sting operation in the 1970s, which led to the conviction of six U.S. representatives and one senator for bribery and conspiracy
• The Jack Abramoff scandal in the 2000s involved a lobbyist who bribed members of Congress with gifts, meals, and campaign contributions in exchange for favors for his clients
• The FIFA corruption case in 2015 involved the indictment of several top officials of the international soccer organization for racketeering, wire fraud, and money laundering related to bribery in the bidding process for World Cup hosting rights

International anti-bribery efforts

• Bribery is a global problem that distorts markets, undermines development, and fuels corruption and instability
• International organizations and treaties have sought to combat bribery through harmonized standards, cooperation, and enforcement

OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

• The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Anti-Bribery Convention is an international treaty that requires signatory countries to criminalize the bribery of foreign public officials
• The Convention, which entered into force in 1999, has been adopted by 44 countries, including all OECD member states and several non-member countries
• The Convention requires parties to establish liability for individuals and companies that bribe foreign officials, and to cooperate in investigations and prosecutions
• The OECD conducts regular peer reviews of member countries' implementation and enforcement of the Convention, and publishes reports on best practices and challenges

Extraterritorial jurisdiction issues

• The globalization of business and finance has created challenges for the enforcement of anti-bribery laws, as corrupt acts may occur across multiple jurisdictions
• Many countries, including the U.S., have asserted extraterritorial jurisdiction over bribery offenses committed by their nationals or companies, even if the conduct occurred entirely abroad
• The FCPA, for example, applies to any U.S. company or individual that bribes a foreign official, regardless of where the bribe takes place
• Extraterritorial enforcement can raise legal and diplomatic issues, such as conflicts with local laws or sovereignty concerns, and requires international cooperation and coordination

Compliance program importance

• To prevent and detect bribery, companies operating internationally must implement robust compliance programs that include clear policies, training, internal controls, and reporting mechanisms
• Effective compliance programs can help companies avoid or mitigate liability for bribery offenses, and may be considered as a factor in sentencing or settlement negotiations
• Key elements of an anti-bribery compliance program include:
  • A clear policy prohibiting bribery and corruption
  • Risk assessments to identify high-risk areas and transactions
  • Due diligence on third-party agents and partners
  • Regular training and communication for employees and stakeholders
  • Internal reporting and investigation procedures
  • Periodic audits and reviews to assess program effectiveness
• International organizations such as the OECD and Transparency International provide guidance and resources for companies seeking to implement or improve their anti-bribery compliance programs