Fiveable
Fiveable
Criminal Law

👨‍⚖️criminal law review

5.6 Forgery

Last Updated on August 20, 2024

Forgery involves creating or altering documents to deceive others. It requires intent to defraud, false writing or alteration, and legal significance of the document. Prosecutors must prove these elements to secure a conviction.

Related crimes include identity theft, fraud, and uttering forged instruments. Penalties vary but can include fines, restitution, and imprisonment. Defenses like lack of intent or authorization may be used to challenge forgery charges.

Elements of forgery

  • Forgery is a criminal offense that involves creating, altering, or using false documents with the intent to deceive or defraud others
  • To prove forgery, prosecutors must establish that the accused had the intent to defraud or deceive, created or altered a false document, and that the document had legal significance

Intent to defraud or deceive

Top images from around the web for Intent to defraud or deceive
Top images from around the web for Intent to defraud or deceive
  • The accused must have acted with the specific purpose of misleading others or causing them to rely on the forged document to their detriment
  • Intent can be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the creation or use of the false document
  • The prosecution does not need to prove that anyone was actually deceived or suffered a loss, only that the intent was present

False writing or alteration

  • Forgery can involve creating an entirely false document from scratch or altering an existing genuine document to change its meaning
  • The false writing or alteration must be material, meaning it affects the legal rights or obligations represented in the document
  • Examples of false writing include signing someone else's name, adding false information to a document, or creating a counterfeit document
  • The forged document must have some legal significance or be capable of affecting legal rights or obligations
  • Examples include contracts, checks, deeds, wills, licenses, certificates, or identification documents
  • The document does not need to be legally binding or enforceable, only that it appears to have legal significance to a reasonable person

Types of forged documents

  • Forgery can involve a wide range of documents, depending on the intent and purpose of the perpetrator
  • Some common types of forged documents include financial instruments, legal contracts, identity documents, and artistic or historical objects

Financial instruments

  • Forged financial instruments include checks, money orders, credit card slips, or bank statements
  • Perpetrators may alter the amount, payee, or signature on a check or create entirely fake checks using stolen account information
  • Forged financial instruments are often used to obtain money or goods fraudulently
  • Forged legal contracts may include agreements for the sale of property, employment contracts, or service agreements
  • Perpetrators may alter the terms of an existing contract or create a false contract to deceive others or gain an unfair advantage
  • Forged contracts can result in significant financial losses or legal disputes for the victims

Identity documents

  • Forged identity documents include driver's licenses, passports, social security cards, or birth certificates
  • Perpetrators may create false identity documents to assume another person's identity, evade law enforcement, or gain access to restricted areas or services
  • Forged identity documents can facilitate other crimes such as identity theft, fraud, or illegal immigration

Artistic or historical objects

  • Forged artistic or historical objects include paintings, sculptures, artifacts, or rare documents
  • Perpetrators may create convincing replicas of famous works of art or historical artifacts and pass them off as genuine to unsuspecting buyers
  • Forged artistic or historical objects can undermine the integrity of the art market and cultural heritage

Forgery vs counterfeiting

  • Forgery and counterfeiting are closely related crimes that involve creating or altering false documents or objects with the intent to deceive
  • While both crimes involve deception, there are some key differences in the methods used and the legal distinctions between them

Similarities in deception

  • Both forgery and counterfeiting involve creating or altering items to make them appear genuine and deceive others
  • The goal of both crimes is often to obtain money, goods, or services fraudulently or to evade legal obligations
  • Both forgery and counterfeiting can undermine public trust in the integrity of documents and financial systems

Differences in creation method

  • Forgery typically involves altering an existing genuine document or creating a false document from scratch using authentic materials
  • Counterfeiting involves creating an entirely false replica of an object, often using different materials or production methods than the genuine item
  • Counterfeiting is more commonly associated with currency, while forgery can involve a wider range of documents and objects
  • In some jurisdictions, forgery and counterfeiting are treated as separate offenses with different elements and penalties
  • Counterfeiting currency or government securities is often a federal offense, while forgery may be prosecuted at the state level
  • The legal distinction between forgery and counterfeiting may depend on the specific document or object involved and the jurisdiction's laws

Proving forgery in court

  • To convict someone of forgery, prosecutors must present evidence that establishes the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt
  • Proving forgery often involves forensic document examination, handwriting analysis, ink and paper analysis, and digital forgery detection

Forensic document examination

  • Forensic document examiners use scientific techniques to analyze questioned documents and determine their authenticity
  • They examine the physical characteristics of the document, such as the paper, ink, and printing methods used
  • Document examiners may also compare the questioned document to known genuine samples to identify inconsistencies or signs of alteration

Handwriting analysis

  • Handwriting analysis involves comparing the handwriting on a questioned document to known samples of the suspect's handwriting
  • Analysts examine the characteristics of the handwriting, such as the slant, pressure, spacing, and letter formation
  • Handwriting analysis can help determine if a signature or handwritten entry is genuine or forged

Ink and paper analysis

  • Ink and paper analysis involves examining the chemical composition and physical properties of the materials used in a questioned document
  • Analysts may use techniques such as chromatography, spectroscopy, or microscopy to identify the types of ink and paper used
  • Inconsistencies in the ink or paper can indicate that a document has been altered or created at a different time than claimed

Digital forgery detection

  • Digital forgery detection involves analyzing electronic documents or digital images for signs of manipulation or alteration
  • Analysts may use software tools to examine the metadata, pixel patterns, or compression artifacts in a digital file
  • Digital forgery detection can help identify fake emails, altered photographs, or forged electronic signatures

Defenses to forgery charges

  • Defendants accused of forgery may raise various defenses to challenge the prosecution's case and avoid conviction
  • Common defenses to forgery charges include lack of intent, consent or authorization, mistake of fact, and entrapment

Lack of intent

  • The defendant may argue that they did not have the requisite intent to defraud or deceive when creating or using the alleged forged document
  • They may claim that they believed the document was genuine or that they did not intend to cause harm or gain an unfair advantage
  • If the prosecution cannot prove intent beyond a reasonable doubt, the forgery charge may be dismissed
  • The defendant may argue that they had the consent or authorization of the person whose signature or identity was allegedly forged
  • They may present evidence that they were acting as an authorized agent or had permission to sign documents on behalf of another person
  • If the defendant can show that they had valid consent or authorization, they may not be guilty of forgery

Mistake of fact

  • The defendant may argue that they acted under a mistaken belief about the facts surrounding the alleged forged document
  • They may claim that they believed the document was genuine or that they were unaware of the legal significance of their actions
  • If the defendant's mistake of fact was reasonable and negates the intent to defraud, they may have a valid defense

Entrapment

  • The defendant may argue that they were induced or persuaded by law enforcement to commit the forgery offense
  • They may claim that the police or other agents used coercion, threats, or undue pressure to get them to create or use a forged document
  • If the defendant can show that they were entrapped and would not have committed the offense otherwise, they may be acquitted

Penalties for forgery

  • The penalties for forgery vary depending on the jurisdiction, the type of document involved, and the circumstances of the offense
  • Common penalties for forgery include fines, restitution, and imprisonment, with aggravating factors leading to more severe sentences and mitigating circumstances potentially reducing the penalties

Fines and restitution

  • Convicted forgers may be required to pay fines as part of their sentence, with the amount varying based on the severity of the offense and the defendant's criminal history
  • In cases where the forgery caused financial losses to victims, the court may order the defendant to pay restitution to compensate for the damages

Imprisonment

  • Forgery can be punishable by imprisonment, with the length of the sentence depending on the jurisdiction and the specific offense
  • Some jurisdictions classify forgery as a misdemeanor, with sentences ranging from a few months to a year in jail
  • More serious forgery offenses, such as those involving large amounts of money or government documents, may be classified as felonies with longer prison sentences

Aggravating factors

  • Certain factors can increase the severity of the penalties for forgery, such as the defendant's criminal history, the amount of loss caused, or the use of sophisticated means
  • Forgery committed in furtherance of other crimes, such as identity theft or fraud, may result in additional charges and enhanced penalties
  • Forgery of government documents or currency may be subject to federal prosecution and harsher sentences

Mitigating circumstances

  • Mitigating circumstances, such as the defendant's lack of criminal history, cooperation with authorities, or evidence of rehabilitation, may lead to more lenient sentences
  • In some cases, defendants may be eligible for alternative sentencing options, such as probation, community service, or drug treatment programs
  • Plea bargains and cooperation with prosecutors can also result in reduced charges or more favorable sentencing recommendations
  • Forgery is often committed in conjunction with or as a means to facilitate other criminal activities
  • Related crimes to forgery include identity theft, fraud and false pretenses, uttering a forged instrument, and possession of forgery devices

Identity theft

  • Identity theft involves using another person's identifying information, such as their name, social security number, or credit card details, without their permission
  • Forged identity documents, such as driver's licenses or passports, are often used to commit identity theft and open fraudulent accounts or obtain benefits in the victim's name
  • Identity theft can have long-lasting consequences for victims, including damage to their credit, financial losses, and difficulty regaining control of their personal information

Fraud and false pretenses

  • Fraud involves intentionally misrepresenting facts to deceive others and obtain money, property, or services
  • False pretenses is a specific type of fraud that involves making false statements or representations to obtain the consent of another person to part with their property
  • Forged documents, such as contracts, invoices, or receipts, may be used to commit fraud or false pretenses by creating the appearance of a legitimate transaction

Uttering a forged instrument

  • Uttering a forged instrument involves presenting or using a forged document as if it were genuine, with the intent to defraud or deceive
  • This crime is distinct from the actual creation of the forged document and focuses on the act of passing it off as authentic
  • Examples of uttering a forged instrument include presenting a forged check at a bank or using a forged prescription to obtain controlled substances

Possession of forgery devices

  • Possession of forgery devices involves having tools, materials, or equipment designed or adapted for use in creating forged documents
  • These devices may include specialized printers, paper, ink, stamps, or software used to create convincing forgeries
  • Possession of forgery devices is often a separate criminal offense, even if no actual forgeries have been created or used, as it suggests an intent to commit forgery in the future

Key Terms to Review (18)

Burden of Proof: The burden of proof refers to the obligation of a party in a legal proceeding to prove their claims or allegations to a certain standard. It is a crucial principle in legal contexts, determining who has the responsibility to establish the truth of an assertion, often impacting the outcomes of cases and defenses. This concept is particularly significant in understanding how various legal defenses, accusations, and proceedings unfold, as it influences the strategies employed by both prosecution and defense.
Counterfeiting: Counterfeiting is the illegal act of creating a fake imitation of a currency, document, or product with the intent to deceive and defraud others. This practice undermines the value of genuine items and can have serious legal consequences. Counterfeiting is often associated with forgery, as both involve the creation of false documents or items, but counterfeiting specifically refers to monetary or commercial fraud.
People v. Sweeney: People v. Sweeney is a significant legal case that addressed the issue of forgery in relation to the intent and capability to deceive through false documentation. The case exemplifies the nuances of proving intent and the implications of using forged documents in legal contexts, highlighting how the law interprets actions and intentions behind creating and using fraudulent documents.
United States v. Burch: United States v. Burch is a significant legal case that addressed issues of forgery and the associated penalties under federal law. In this case, the court evaluated the circumstances under which an act constitutes forgery, focusing on the intent of the accused and the authenticity of the documents involved. The ruling clarified how intent and fraudulent action must align for a conviction to be upheld in forgery-related offenses.
Fraud: Fraud is a deliberate deception intended to secure an unfair or unlawful gain, often involving misrepresentation or concealment of facts. It encompasses a wide range of illegal activities that deceive individuals or entities for personal or financial benefits. This can include forging documents, creating false identities, and manipulating information to trick others into providing resources or money.
Monetary restitution: Monetary restitution refers to the court-ordered compensation that a convicted offender must pay to the victim for losses resulting from a crime. This concept ensures that victims receive financial compensation, aiming to restore them to their pre-crime state as much as possible. It is an essential part of criminal justice that emphasizes accountability and the principle of making victims whole after suffering harm due to criminal acts.
Felony charge: A felony charge is a formal accusation that a person has committed a serious crime, which typically results in harsher penalties than misdemeanors. Felonies can include violent crimes, property crimes, and white-collar crimes, leading to significant prison time or substantial fines. Understanding felony charges is essential because they have long-term consequences for individuals, including the potential loss of civil rights.
Prosecutorial Discretion: Prosecutorial discretion refers to the authority of prosecutors to decide whether to bring charges against an individual, what charges to file, and how to handle a case once it is in the judicial system. This discretion allows prosecutors to prioritize certain cases, consider the interests of justice, and manage limited resources. The exercise of prosecutorial discretion plays a significant role in shaping the outcomes of criminal cases, including those involving offenses like forgery.
Lack of Intent: Lack of intent refers to the absence of a deliberate purpose or goal behind an action, which is crucial in determining criminal liability. In criminal law, many offenses require a certain level of intent to establish guilt, and without it, a person may not be held accountable for their actions. Understanding this concept is essential because it differentiates between actions taken with a conscious design to cause harm and those that occur without malicious objectives, significantly affecting how cases are prosecuted and the outcomes involved.
Uniform Commercial Code: The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is a comprehensive set of laws governing commercial transactions in the United States. Its primary aim is to standardize and simplify the legal framework for sales, leases, and secured transactions, thereby facilitating commerce. By providing consistent rules across jurisdictions, the UCC helps reduce legal ambiguities that can arise in business dealings, making it essential for understanding issues like forgery and embezzlement in commercial contexts.
California Penal Code Section 470: California Penal Code Section 470 defines the crime of forgery, which involves the false making, altering, or using of a document with the intent to defraud. This statute emphasizes the unlawful creation or modification of various legal documents, such as checks or contracts, and highlights the serious nature of such actions in terms of potential harm to individuals and institutions.
Materiality: Materiality refers to the significance or relevance of information, specifically regarding its potential impact on decision-making. In the context of legal matters, particularly with forgery, materiality focuses on whether a misrepresentation or alteration of a document could influence the decisions or actions of a reasonable person. Understanding materiality helps determine the seriousness of the forgery and its consequences in legal scenarios.
False writing: False writing refers to the act of creating a document or representation that is knowingly forged or altered to deceive others, often with the intent to defraud. This term connects closely to the concept of forgery, as it encompasses various forms of dishonesty involving written materials, including signatures, legal documents, and financial instruments. Understanding false writing is crucial for grasping how individuals can manipulate documents to commit fraud or mislead others for personal gain.
Intent to defraud: Intent to defraud refers to the deliberate intention of an individual to deceive another person for the purpose of financial gain or to cause a loss to another. This intent is a crucial element in various fraudulent activities, as it demonstrates that the individual acted with purpose and knowledge that their actions were wrong. Understanding this concept is essential when examining crimes like forgery and embezzlement, where deception plays a central role in the illegal act.
Forgery of Documents: Forgery of documents refers to the illegal act of altering, creating, or signing a document with the intent to deceive or defraud someone. This crime can involve various types of documents, including contracts, identification papers, and financial instruments, and it aims to mislead individuals or institutions into believing that the document is authentic.
Signatory Authority: Signatory authority refers to the power or right of an individual or organization to legally bind themselves or others by signing documents or contracts. This authority is critical in various legal contexts, especially when it comes to transactions and agreements, as it determines who can enter into commitments on behalf of another party. In the realm of forgery, understanding signatory authority is essential, as the unauthorized signing of documents can lead to serious legal consequences and implications for those involved.
Check Forgery: Check forgery is the act of falsifying or altering a check with the intent to deceive and defraud another party. This crime typically involves creating a fake check, altering the amount or the payee's name on an existing check, or signing someone else's name without permission. Check forgery not only constitutes a criminal offense but also has severe legal repercussions and can lead to significant financial losses for individuals and businesses.
Mistake of Fact: Mistake of fact refers to a misunderstanding or incorrect belief regarding a factual situation that negates the intention to commit a crime. It can significantly influence mens rea, as it may demonstrate that an individual did not have the necessary mental state required for liability. This concept helps to assess the defendant's state of mind and whether they truly intended to engage in criminal behavior or if their actions were based on a genuine misconception.
Glossary