4.3 Kidnapping

Kidnapping, a serious criminal offense, involves unlawfully taking and moving a person against their will. This topic explores the elements of kidnapping, including actus reus and mens rea, and distinguishes it from false imprisonment.

The chapter delves into various aspects of kidnapping, such as kidnapping of minors, aggravated kidnapping, and defenses to kidnapping charges. It also examines sentencing guidelines and high-profile cases that have shaped public perception and legal precedent.

Elements of kidnapping

• Kidnapping is a serious criminal offense that involves the unlawful taking and carrying away of a person against their will
• The elements of kidnapping vary by jurisdiction but generally include the actus reus (guilty act) and mens rea (guilty mind) of the offender
• Kidnapping is distinguished from false imprisonment, which does not require the element of asportation (movement of the victim)

Actus reus of kidnapping

Top images from around the web for Actus reus of kidnapping

• 

  Kylo Ren Kidnapping Rey (sketch) by TheBabyDragons on DeviantArt View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ravana slaughtering Jatayu the vulture, while an abducted Sita looks away in horror ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Araṇya-Kāṇḍa - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Kylo Ren Kidnapping Rey (sketch) by TheBabyDragons on DeviantArt View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ravana slaughtering Jatayu the vulture, while an abducted Sita looks away in horror ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Actus reus of kidnapping

• 

  Kylo Ren Kidnapping Rey (sketch) by TheBabyDragons on DeviantArt View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ravana slaughtering Jatayu the vulture, while an abducted Sita looks away in horror ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Araṇya-Kāṇḍa - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Kylo Ren Kidnapping Rey (sketch) by TheBabyDragons on DeviantArt View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ravana slaughtering Jatayu the vulture, while an abducted Sita looks away in horror ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The actus reus of kidnapping is the physical act of unlawfully taking and carrying away a person against their will
• This element requires actual physical movement or asportation of the victim, even if only for a short distance
• The use of force, threat of force, or deception to accomplish the taking and carrying away also satisfies the actus reus requirement
• The victim must be moved to a different location for the act to constitute kidnapping (moving to a different room within the same building may suffice)

Mens rea of kidnapping

• The mens rea of kidnapping is the mental state of the offender at the time of the unlawful taking and carrying away
• Most jurisdictions require a specific intent to unlawfully confine or move the victim, rather than a general intent
• The offender must have knowledge that the victim does not consent to the taking and carrying away
• Some jurisdictions also require an additional intent to harm, terrorize, or commit another crime against the victim

Kidnapping vs false imprisonment

• False imprisonment is a related but distinct offense that involves the unlawful confinement of a person against their will
• False imprisonment does not require the element of asportation (movement) that is necessary for kidnapping
• Kidnapping is generally considered a more serious offense than false imprisonment due to the additional element of movement
• Some jurisdictions merge the offenses of kidnapping and false imprisonment if the confinement is only incidental to the kidnapping

Kidnapping of minors

• Kidnapping of minors is a particularly egregious form of the offense due to the vulnerability of child victims
• Parental kidnapping and stranger kidnapping are two distinct types of kidnapping involving minors
• Many jurisdictions have specific statutory provisions that provide enhanced penalties for kidnapping of minors

Parental kidnapping

• Parental kidnapping occurs when one parent unlawfully takes and carries away their child in violation of the other parent's custodial rights
• This often occurs in the context of divorce or child custody disputes where one parent seeks to deprive the other of access to the child
• Parental kidnapping can be charged as a criminal offense, but is also often addressed through civil child custody proceedings
• The Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA) is a federal law that provides a framework for resolving interstate custody disputes and preventing parental kidnapping

Stranger kidnapping of minors

• Stranger kidnapping of minors occurs when a child is unlawfully taken and carried away by someone who is not a family member or acquaintance
• This type of kidnapping is often motivated by sexual exploitation, human trafficking, or other nefarious purposes
• Stranger kidnapping of minors is one of the most feared crimes and receives significant attention from law enforcement and media
• The AMBER Alert system is a public notification system used to broadcast information about child abductions in an effort to facilitate their safe recovery

Statutory provisions for minor kidnapping

• Many states have specific laws that provide enhanced penalties for kidnapping of minors, particularly young children
• These statutes often eliminate the need to prove the use of force, threat of force, or lack of consent when the victim is below a certain age (varies by state)
• Some states also have separate offenses for parental kidnapping or custodial interference that provide specific penalties and remedies
• Federal law also provides enhanced penalties for kidnapping of minors, particularly in cases of interstate or international abduction

Aggravated kidnapping

• Aggravated kidnapping is a more serious form of the offense that involves additional aggravating factors beyond the basic elements
• Kidnapping for ransom, kidnapping with intent to harm, and kidnapping with other aggravating factors are common examples of aggravated kidnapping
• Aggravated kidnapping is often punished more severely than simple kidnapping due to the increased harm or risk to the victim

Kidnapping for ransom

• Kidnapping for ransom occurs when the offender demands payment or other consideration for the safe return of the victim
• This type of kidnapping is often perpetrated by organized crime groups or individuals seeking financial gain
• Kidnapping for ransom is a federal offense under the Lindbergh Law, which was enacted in response to the famous kidnapping of Charles Lindbergh's infant son
• Many states also have specific statutes that provide enhanced penalties for kidnapping for ransom

Kidnapping with intent to harm

• Kidnapping with intent to harm occurs when the offender intends to physically injure, sexually assault, or kill the victim during the course of the kidnapping
• This type of kidnapping is often perpetrated by individuals with a personal grudge or vendetta against the victim
• Kidnapping with intent to harm is often punished more severely than simple kidnapping due to the increased risk of physical harm to the victim
• Some states have specific statutes that provide enhanced penalties for kidnapping with intent to harm or terrorize the victim

Kidnapping with other aggravating factors

• Other aggravating factors that can elevate a kidnapping charge include the use of a weapon, the kidnapping of a public official or law enforcement officer, or the kidnapping of multiple victims
• The use of a firearm or other deadly weapon during a kidnapping can result in additional charges and enhanced penalties
• Kidnapping of a public official or law enforcement officer is often punished more severely due to the threat to public safety and the integrity of the justice system
• Kidnapping of multiple victims (mass kidnapping) is a rare but particularly egregious form of the offense that can result in life imprisonment or even capital punishment in some jurisdictions

Defenses to kidnapping charges

• There are several potential defenses that a defendant can raise to contest a kidnapping charge, depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case
• Consent, necessity, and mistake of fact are three common defenses that may be asserted in kidnapping cases
• The availability and success of these defenses depends on the jurisdiction and the specific elements of the kidnapping statute

Consent as a defense

• Consent can be a defense to kidnapping if the alleged victim voluntarily agreed to go with the defendant
• This defense is more likely to succeed if there is evidence of an existing relationship or prior agreement between the parties
• However, consent is not a defense if it was obtained through force, threat of force, or deception, or if the victim was legally incapable of giving consent due to age or mental incapacity
• The prosecution bears the burden of proving lack of consent as an element of the kidnapping offense

Necessity as a defense

• Necessity can be a defense to kidnapping if the defendant reasonably believed that the act was necessary to prevent a greater harm from occurring
• This defense is typically limited to situations where the defendant was faced with an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury and had no reasonable alternative course of action
• The defendant bears the burden of proving necessity by a preponderance of the evidence
• Necessity is a difficult defense to assert in kidnapping cases and is rarely successful

Mistake of fact defenses

• Mistake of fact can be a defense to kidnapping if the defendant had a reasonable but mistaken belief about a fact that negates the required mens rea for the offense
• For example, if the defendant reasonably believed that the alleged victim consented to go with them, this could negate the specific intent to unlawfully confine or move the victim
• The reasonableness of the defendant's mistake is judged by an objective standard based on the circumstances known to the defendant at the time of the offense
• Mistake of fact is a challenging defense to assert in kidnapping cases, particularly if there is evidence of force, threat of force, or deception used by the defendant

Sentencing for kidnapping convictions

• Kidnapping is a serious felony offense that carries significant penalties upon conviction, including lengthy prison sentences and fines
• The specific sentence imposed in a kidnapping case depends on a variety of factors, including the severity of the offense, the offender's criminal history, and the jurisdiction's sentencing guidelines
• Federal and state sentencing guidelines provide a framework for determining an appropriate sentence, but judges often have discretion to deviate from the guidelines based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case

Federal sentencing guidelines

• The Federal Sentencing Guidelines provide a detailed framework for determining sentences in federal kidnapping cases
• The guidelines use a system of offense levels and criminal history categories to calculate a recommended sentencing range based on the specific characteristics of the offense and the offender
• Kidnapping is a base offense level 32 under the guidelines, which can be increased or decreased based on aggravating or mitigating factors such as the use of a weapon, the degree of injury to the victim, or the offender's acceptance of responsibility
• Federal judges are required to consider the guidelines in imposing a sentence, but are not bound by them and can depart upward or downward based on the specific facts and circumstances of the case

State sentencing variations

• Each state has its own sentencing laws and guidelines for kidnapping convictions, which can vary widely in terms of the severity of the penalties imposed
• Some states have mandatory minimum sentences for kidnapping offenses, while others allow judges more discretion in determining an appropriate sentence
• Many states have different degrees of kidnapping offenses based on aggravating factors such as the age of the victim, the use of a weapon, or the intent to harm or sexually assault the victim
• State sentencing guidelines may also consider the offender's criminal history, the impact on the victim, and other mitigating or aggravating factors in determining an appropriate sentence

Factors affecting sentencing severity

• The severity of a kidnapping sentence can be influenced by a variety of aggravating and mitigating factors, which may be considered by the judge in determining an appropriate sentence
• Aggravating factors that can increase the severity of a sentence include the use of a weapon, the degree of harm or injury to the victim, the vulnerability of the victim (such as a child or elderly person), and the offender's criminal history
• Mitigating factors that can decrease the severity of a sentence include the offender's lack of criminal history, the offender's acceptance of responsibility and remorse, and the victim's consent or lack of injury
• The presence of multiple aggravating factors can result in a sentence at the high end of the sentencing range or even an upward departure from the guidelines, while the presence of significant mitigating factors can result in a sentence at the low end of the range or a downward departure

High-profile kidnapping cases

• Kidnapping cases often receive significant media attention due to the shocking and sensational nature of the crime
• Some kidnapping cases have become famous historical events that continue to capture the public imagination decades later
• High-profile kidnapping cases can also result in landmark court decisions that shape the development of kidnapping laws and legal precedent

Famous historical kidnappings

• The Lindbergh baby kidnapping in 1932 was one of the most famous kidnapping cases in American history, involving the abduction and murder of the infant son of famous aviator Charles Lindbergh
• The kidnapping of Patty Hearst in 1974 by the Symbionese Liberation Army, a radical left-wing terrorist group, also captured national attention and raised questions about Stockholm syndrome and the culpability of kidnapping victims who allegedly join their captors
• The kidnapping and murder of Adam Walsh in 1981 led to the creation of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and increased public awareness of child abduction and exploitation
• The kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart in 2002 by a religious fanatic and his wife also received extensive media coverage and raised questions about the psychological effects of long-term captivity on victims

Landmark kidnapping court decisions

• The Supreme Court's decision in Chatwin v. United States (1946) held that the Federal Kidnapping Act (Lindbergh Law) required evidence of physical restraint or confinement, not just psychological coercion, to support a conviction
• The Court's decision in Frisbie v. Collins (1952) established the "Ker-Frisbie doctrine," which holds that a defendant cannot challenge the jurisdiction of a court based on the manner in which they were brought within the court's jurisdiction, even if they were kidnapped or unlawfully seized
• The California Supreme Court's decision in People v. Mayberry (1975) held that a reasonable mistake of fact regarding the victim's consent could negate the specific intent required for kidnapping, establishing mistake of fact as a potential defense
• The Supreme Court's decision in Payne v. Tennessee (1991) held that victim impact evidence could be admitted in the sentencing phase of capital cases, including kidnapping cases resulting in murder, to inform the jury's decision on whether to impose the death penalty

Impact of media on kidnapping trials

• High-profile kidnapping cases often receive extensive media coverage, which can have both positive and negative effects on the criminal justice process
• Media attention can increase public awareness of the crime and aid in the apprehension of suspects, as in the case of the Lindbergh baby kidnapping where the ransom notes were widely publicized
• However, media coverage can also prejudice potential jurors and make it difficult for defendants to receive a fair trial, as in the case of the O.J. Simpson trial where the media circus surrounding the case was unprecedented
• The media can also shape public perceptions of kidnapping victims and perpetrators, sometimes creating sympathetic narratives or villainizing individuals based on limited information
• Defense attorneys in high-profile kidnapping cases often seek to change venue or sequester jurors to mitigate the impact of media coverage on the fairness of the trial