The 20th century produced both movements that challenged existing power structures and regimes that intensified repression. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela each used nonviolent resistance to pursue political change, demonstrating that organized civil disobedience could challenge powerful states. At the same time, militarized states under leaders like Augusto Pinochet in Chile, Francisco Franco in Spain, and Idi Amin in Uganda responded to opposition with repression, and some movements, including the Shining Path in Peru, used violence against civilians to pursue political aims.
- Nonviolent resistance: Gandhi's satyagraha in India, King's civil rights campaigns in the U.S., and Mandela's ANC activism in South Africa all used peaceful protest and civil disobedience to challenge unjust power structures.
- Augusto Pinochet: Chilean military dictator who overthrew the elected government in 1973 with U.S. backing and used state violence to suppress opposition, illustrating how Cold War dynamics enabled authoritarian repression.
- African National Congress: South African organization led by Nelson Mandela that fought apartheid, shifting from nonviolent protest to armed resistance before returning to negotiation.
- Military-industrial complex: The buildup of weapons industries and military spending by major powers intensified global conflicts rather than resolving them.
What distinguished movements that used nonviolence from those that used violence, and what outcomes did each tend to produce?