Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Mendelian inheritance is the foundation of everything you'll encounter in genetics—from predicting offspring ratios to understanding why certain diseases run in families. When you're working through crosses on an exam, you're really being tested on whether you understand how alleles segregate, how genes on different chromosomes behave independently, and how different dominance relationships change the phenotypic outcomes. These principles don't just apply to pea plants; they're the framework for analyzing inheritance in any organism.
Here's the key insight: the specific ratios you calculate (3:1, 9:3:3:1, 1:2:1) aren't random numbers to memorize—they're predictable outcomes of meiosis. Every cross you solve is really asking you to apply the Law of Segregation or Independent Assortment. Don't just memorize the ratios; know which mechanism produces each one and which type of dominance you're dealing with. That's what separates a student who can handle any genetics problem from one who freezes when the numbers look unfamiliar.
These two laws explain why genetic crosses produce predictable ratios. Understanding the cellular basis—alleles separating during meiosis I and chromosomes assorting independently—is essential for solving any inheritance problem.
Compare: Monohybrid vs. Dihybrid crosses—both demonstrate segregation, but only dihybrid crosses test independent assortment. If an FRQ asks you to prove genes are on different chromosomes, a dihybrid cross producing 9:3:3:1 is your evidence.
The type of dominance determines what phenotype the heterozygote displays. This is purely about protein function and expression—not about which allele gets inherited more often. Recognizing dominance type is critical because it changes the expected ratios.
Compare: Incomplete dominance vs. Codominance—both produce 1:2:1 ratios, but incomplete dominance creates a blend (pink flowers) while codominance shows both traits distinctly (AB blood type). Exams love testing whether you know this difference.
Real inheritance often involves more than two alleles or genes located on sex chromosomes. These patterns build on Mendel's laws but add complexity you need to recognize.
Compare: Sex-linked vs. Autosomal inheritance—both can be dominant or recessive, but sex-linked traits show unequal expression between sexes. If an FRQ shows a trait appearing mostly in males, immediately consider X-linked recessive.
These aren't just techniques—they're the methods you'll use on every genetics question. Master the logic behind each tool.
Compare: Punnett squares vs. Test crosses—Punnett squares predict outcomes when you know both genotypes; test crosses reveal an unknown genotype. Use test crosses when the problem says "determine the genotype of..."
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Law of Segregation | Monohybrid cross, 3:1 ratio, test cross |
| Law of Independent Assortment | Dihybrid cross, 9:3:3:1 ratio |
| Complete Dominance | Pea plant height, 3:1 phenotypic ratio |
| Incomplete Dominance | Snapdragon flower color, 1:2:1 ratio |
| Codominance | ABO blood type (AB phenotype), 1:2:1 ratio |
| Multiple Alleles | ABO blood group (, , ) |
| X-Linked Recessive | Color blindness, hemophilia |
| Autosomal Inheritance | Pedigree analysis, equal sex expression |
Both incomplete dominance and codominance produce a 1:2:1 phenotypic ratio in F2. How would you distinguish between them if given only phenotype descriptions?
A dihybrid cross yields a 9:3:3:1 ratio. Which of Mendel's laws does this demonstrate, and what must be true about the chromosomal location of the two genes?
Why are males more likely than females to express X-linked recessive traits? Explain using the concept of hemizygosity.
You cross a purple-flowered plant with a white-flowered plant and all F1 offspring are purple. In the F2, you observe 3:1 purple to white. What type of dominance is this, and what would the F2 ratio be if it were incomplete dominance instead?
Compare and contrast a test cross and a standard Punnett square: when would you use each, and what question does each one answer?