scoresvideos

🇺🇸ap us history review

key term - Sectional Tensions Over Slavery

Citation:

Definition

Sectional tensions over slavery refer to the growing conflicts and divisions between the Northern and Southern states in the United States during the 19th century, primarily centered around the institution of slavery and its expansion into new territories. These tensions intensified as debates over states' rights, economic interests, and moral considerations about slavery emerged, ultimately contributing to significant political strife and the eventual outbreak of the Civil War.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was an early attempt to manage sectional tensions by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, while establishing a line across the Louisiana Territory that limited slavery's expansion.
  2. The abolitionist movement gained momentum in the North, with activists like Frederick Douglass and Harriet Beecher Stowe challenging the morality of slavery and influencing public opinion against it.
  3. The Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court in 1857 ruled that African Americans could not be considered citizens and that Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in the territories, inflaming sectional tensions further.
  4. The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, who was viewed as anti-slavery, prompted several Southern states to secede from the Union, showcasing the depth of sectional divisions.
  5. The publication of Uncle Tom's Cabin in 1852 played a pivotal role in shaping Northern perceptions about slavery, galvanizing anti-slavery sentiment and contributing to the divide between North and South.

Review Questions

  • How did early legislative compromises attempt to address sectional tensions over slavery, and what were their limitations?
    • Early legislative compromises like the Missouri Compromise aimed to maintain a balance between slave and free states by admitting them in pairs. However, these compromises often proved temporary solutions that failed to resolve underlying issues. For instance, while the Missouri Compromise established a boundary for slavery's expansion, it did not address the growing abolitionist sentiment in the North or effectively prevent further conflict, which would later erupt with events like the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
  • Analyze how key events like Bleeding Kansas impacted sectional tensions over slavery during the 1850s.
    • Bleeding Kansas emerged from the Kansas-Nebraska Act's concept of popular sovereignty, where settlers decided whether to allow slavery in their territory. This led to violent clashes between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions. The chaos highlighted how deeply divided the nation had become over slavery, reinforcing fears on both sides about the future of their social orders and intensifying calls for action—ultimately setting a violent precedent for future conflicts leading up to the Civil War.
  • Evaluate how sectional tensions over slavery contributed to the broader political landscape leading up to the Civil War.
    • Sectional tensions over slavery significantly shaped American politics in the lead-up to the Civil War by creating polarized political parties and influencing national policies. The rise of the Republican Party as an anti-slavery force demonstrated a clear divide between North and South. Key events such as the Dred Scott decision and John Brown's raid increased mistrust between regions. Ultimately, these tensions culminated in Lincoln's election in 1860, which prompted Southern states to secede, marking a definitive breakdown in national unity and leading directly to war.

"Sectional Tensions Over Slavery" also found in: