Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Definition
A landmark Supreme Court case that ruled evidence obtained illegally cannot be used in state courts, establishing what is known as 'exclusionary rule.'
Analogy
Imagine you're playing a game where you find hidden objects but you cheat by peeking at answers beforehand. Your friends find out and decide your findings don't count because you didn't play fair - this is similar to how evidence obtained illegally isn't allowed in court due to Mapp v. Ohio.
Related terms
Exclusionary Rule: A law that prohibits use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials.
Fourth Amendment: The part of U.S. Constitution protecting citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by government officials.
Search Warrant: A legal document authorizing police or other officials to enter and search premises.
"Mapp v. Ohio (1961)" appears in:
Are you a college student?
Study guides for the entire semester
200k practice questions
Glossary of 50k key terms - memorize important vocab
Resources
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.