The AP English Language and Composition Synthesis Essay is a complex task that tests your ability to develop an evidence-based argument drawing from multiple sources. You'll have 15 minutes to read and 40 minutes to write. This essay type mirrors real-world analytical writing, where you must evaluate various perspectives and create a coherent argument.
Structure of a Synthesis Essay Question
Every synthesis prompt includes:
- An introduction to the topic
- 6-7 sources of various types (articles, graphs, images, etc.)
- A specific task that asks you to develop a position
- Instructions for using the sources
Note: You can find the example essay prompt and sources used in this guide here.
Understanding Source Types and Their Strategic Use
Statistical Data
- Look for trends and patterns
- Consider what's NOT shown in the data
- Connect numbers to larger implications
Text-Based Sources
- Identify the author's credentials
- Note publication date and context
- Mark key quotations that could support multiple positions
Visual Sources
- Analyze both obvious and subtle details
- Consider how visuals complement or contradict text sources
- Look for patterns across multiple years/data points
Key Components of Success (Based on Scoring Rubric)
Thesis (1 point)
Your thesis must:
- Present a defensible position that responds directly to the prompt
- Go beyond simply restating the issue
- Make a specific claim that can be defended
- Address the complexity of the issue
Strong thesis formula: Although [acknowledge counterargument], [your position] because [reason 1], [reason 2], and [reason 3].
❌ Example of a weak thesis (no points):
"Television has changed how presidential elections work."
✅ Example of a strong thesis (1 point):
"While television has made presidential candidates more accessible to voters through debates and increased coverage, it has simultaneously shifted the focus from policy substance to image management, fundamentally altering how candidates must present themselves to the American public."
To earn full credit, you must:
- Use specific evidence from at least three sources
- Explain how each piece of evidence supports your argument
- Create clear lines of reasoning that connect your evidence to your claims
- Consistently explain the significance of your evidence
- Show relationships between sources (corroboration, contradiction, qualification)
Evidence Integration Formula:
- Introduce the evidence (context)
- Present the evidence (quote or paraphrase)
- Explain the evidence (analysis)
- Connect to thesis (significance)
Sophistication (1 point)
Demonstrate sophisticated thinking through:
- Nuanced argument development
- Recognition of multiple perspectives
- Analysis of subtle differences between sources
- Connection to broader contexts or implications
- Effective rhetorical choices
- Examination of underlying assumptions
Advanced Integration Techniques
Source Conversation Method
Create dialogue between sources:
- Source A argues X
- Source B supports this by showing Y
- However, Source C qualifies this by noting Z
Counterargument Integration
- Acknowledge opposing views
- Use sources to support AND refute
- Explain why your position is more convincing
Common Pitfalls and Solutions
Content Pitfalls
- Simply summarizing sources ➡️ Analyze and synthesize instead
- Using only two sources ➡️ Plan source integration before writing
- Making claims without evidence ➡️ Use evidence sandwich method
- Writing a thesis that only restates ➡️ Use thesis formula provided
Organization Pitfalls
- Random source usage ➡️ Group sources by subtopic
- Lack of transitions ➡️ Use source relationships to connect ideas
- Weak conclusions ➡️ Return to broader implications
What's Next
The next study guide will focus on thesis development, including:
- Advanced thesis formulation techniques
- Methods for identifying arguable claims
- Strategies for addressing complexity