Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Enzyme inhibition isn't just a biochemistry concept to memorizeโit's the foundation for understanding how drugs work, how metabolic pathways are regulated, and how cells fine-tune their chemistry in real time. When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to demonstrate that you understand kinetic parameters, binding mechanisms, and regulatory logic. The differences between inhibition types show up constantly in exam questions, particularly when you need to interpret Lineweaver-Burk plots or predict how changing substrate concentration affects reaction velocity.
Here's the key insight: each inhibition type tells a story about where the inhibitor binds, when it binds (to free enzyme, ES complex, or both), and what happens to and as a result. Don't just memorize that competitive inhibition increases โunderstand why it does (the inhibitor is blocking the active site, so you need more substrate to outcompete it). Master the mechanism, and the kinetic changes follow logically.
These inhibitors compete directly with substrate for access to the enzyme's active site. Because binding is reversible and mutually exclusive with substrate, increasing substrate concentration can overcome the inhibition.
These inhibitors bind to sites other than the active site, causing conformational changes or blocking catalysis without directly competing for substrate binding. The key distinction is whether the inhibitor prefers free enzyme, ES complex, or both equally.
Compare: Competitive vs. Non-Competitive Inhibitionโboth are reversible, but competitive inhibitors can be overcome with excess substrate while non-competitive cannot. On a Lineweaver-Burk plot, competitive inhibition changes the x-intercept () while non-competitive changes the y-intercept (). If an FRQ gives you kinetic data, check which parameter changed to identify the inhibition type.
Compare: Uncompetitive vs. Mixed Inhibitionโboth affect and , but uncompetitive only binds ES (both parameters decrease proportionally, giving parallel lines on Lineweaver-Burk), while mixed binds both E and ES with different affinities (lines intersect off-axis).
Unlike reversible inhibitors that establish equilibrium, irreversible inhibitors permanently disable enzymes. Covalent bond formation means the enzyme molecule is lost from the active pool entirely.
Compare: Irreversible vs. Non-Competitive Inhibitionโboth decrease without affecting substrate binding, but irreversible inhibition is permanent and time-dependent. Aspirin (irreversibly acetylates COX) vs. a reversible non-competitive inhibitor: one dose of aspirin affects platelets for their entire lifespan because platelets can't make new enzyme.
These inhibition patterns serve important physiological roles in controlling metabolic flux. Cells use these mechanisms to respond to changing conditions and maintain homeostasis.
Compare: Allosteric Inhibition vs. Substrate Inhibitionโboth represent regulatory mechanisms, but allosteric inhibition involves a separate molecule binding at a regulatory site, while substrate inhibition involves the substrate itself at high concentrations. Allosteric regulation is typically the cell's intentional control mechanism; substrate inhibition is often an intrinsic kinetic property.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Active site binding | Competitive inhibition |
| Allosteric site binding | Non-competitive, mixed, allosteric inhibition |
| ES complex only | Uncompetitive inhibition |
| unchanged | Competitive inhibition |
| unchanged | Non-competitive inhibition |
| Both parameters decrease | Uncompetitive inhibition |
| Covalent modification | Irreversible inhibition |
| Sigmoidal kinetics | Allosteric inhibition |
| High [S] causes inhibition | Substrate inhibition |
You're analyzing a Lineweaver-Burk plot and notice that adding an inhibitor increases the slope but doesn't change the y-intercept. What type of inhibition is this, and what happened to and ?
Which two inhibition types both decrease while leaving unchanged? What distinguishes them mechanistically?
A pharmaceutical company wants to design a drug that can be overcome by the body's natural substrate if concentrations rise. Which inhibition type should they target, and why?
Compare uncompetitive and mixed inhibition: both affect , but in what direction does change for each, and what does this tell you about where the inhibitor binds?
An enzyme shows normal Michaelis-Menten kinetics at low substrate concentrations but decreased velocity at very high substrate concentrations. What type of inhibition is occurring, and how would you distinguish this from allosteric inhibition on a kinetic plot?