Types of Archaeological Evidence

Why This Matters

Understanding the different types of archaeological evidence is fundamental to interpreting the human past. You're being tested not just on what archaeologists find, but on how different evidence types work together to reconstruct ancient lifeways, environments, and social structures. Each category of evidence answers different questions—artifacts reveal technology and trade, ecofacts illuminate diet and climate, and features show how people organized their world.

The key principle here is that no single type of evidence tells the whole story. Exam questions will push you to think about context, formation processes, and interpretive methods. Don't just memorize definitions—know what each evidence type can and cannot tell us, and how archaeologists extract meaning from material remains. When you see an FRQ about site interpretation, your ability to connect multiple evidence types will set your answer apart.

---

Material Culture: What People Made and Used

The objects people created, modified, and left behind form the backbone of archaeological interpretation. Material culture reflects choices—about technology, aesthetics, identity, and daily practice.

Artifacts

• Portable, human-made objects—tools, pottery, jewelry, and weapons that can be removed from their original location
• Typological analysis allows archaeologists to establish chronologies and trace cultural connections across sites and regions
• Manufacturing techniques reveal technological knowledge, trade networks, and social organization (a bronze sword implies metallurgical expertise and resource access)

Rock Art and Petroglyphs

• Images carved or painted on rock surfaces—ranging from abstract symbols to detailed hunting scenes and ritual imagery
• Stylistic sequences help establish relative chronologies even without absolute dating methods
• Cultural expression offers rare glimpses into belief systems, cosmology, and communication practices that don't survive in other material forms

---

Spatial Evidence: How People Organized Their World

Some archaeological evidence can't be picked up and moved to a lab. Features and structures reveal the architecture of daily life—where people cooked, slept, worshipped, and buried their dead.

Features

• Non-portable traces of human activity—hearths, storage pits, postholes, and ditches that are fixed in the landscape
• Contextual relationships between features and artifacts are critical; a potsherd means more when found in a cooking hearth than in a trash pit
• Spatial patterning reveals activity areas, site organization, and how communities structured their living spaces

Structures

• Built environments at larger scales—houses, temples, fortifications, and public buildings
• Architectural choices reflect social hierarchy, religious practices, and cultural identity (monumental architecture often signals centralized authority)
• Construction techniques provide evidence of engineering knowledge, labor organization, and available materials

---

Environmental Evidence: Reconstructing Past Landscapes

Archaeology isn't just about people—it's about people in environments. Ecofacts and soil samples reveal the ecological context of human activity and how communities adapted to or modified their surroundings.

Ecofacts

• Natural remains associated with human activity—animal bones, plant seeds, pollen, and shells that weren't manufactured but were used, consumed, or deposited by people
• Subsistence reconstruction through faunal and botanical analysis reveals what people ate, hunted, farmed, and gathered
• Paleoenvironmental indicators like pollen sequences document climate change, vegetation shifts, and landscape modification over time

Soil Samples

• Matrix analysis examines composition, color, pH, and texture to understand site formation and land use history
• Chemical residues—phosphates from organic decay, ash concentrations, or metal traces—can identify activity areas invisible to the naked eye
• Post-depositional processes like erosion, bioturbation, and flooding affect how evidence is preserved and distributed

---

Biological Evidence: Reading Human Bodies

Human remains offer uniquely direct evidence about past individuals and populations. The body becomes an archive—recording diet, disease, ancestry, and life experience.

Human Remains

• Osteological analysis reveals age, sex, health conditions, injuries, and physical stress markers that document lived experience
• Burial practices reflect cultural beliefs about death, social status, and community identity (grave goods, body positioning, and tomb architecture all carry meaning)
• Biomolecular techniques—DNA analysis, isotopic studies, and radiocarbon dating—provide information about ancestry, migration, diet, and chronology

---

Temporal Evidence: Establishing When Things Happened

Chronology is the backbone of archaeological interpretation. Without knowing when, we can't understand why or how change occurred.

Stratigraphy

• Law of superposition—in undisturbed deposits, lower layers are older than upper layers, providing relative chronological frameworks
• Harris matrices document complex stratigraphic relationships, showing how layers intersect, cut through, or overlie one another
• Site formation processes—both natural (flooding, erosion) and cultural (construction, destruction)—must be understood to interpret stratigraphic sequences accurately

---

Documentary and Remote Evidence: Beyond Excavation

Not all archaeological evidence comes from digging. Written records and remote sensing technologies expand what we can know and where we can look.

Written Records and Inscriptions

• Direct historical evidence—administrative documents, religious texts, royal inscriptions, and personal letters that name people, places, and events
• Textual archaeology combines documentary and material evidence to cross-check interpretations and fill gaps in the written record
• Literacy bias means written sources typically represent elite perspectives; archaeological evidence often reveals lives absent from texts

Geophysical Data

• Non-invasive survey techniques—ground-penetrating radar (GPR), magnetometry, resistivity, and LiDAR detect subsurface features without excavation
• Site prospection identifies buried structures, ditches, and activity areas, guiding where to excavate and what to expect
• Landscape-scale analysis reveals settlement patterns, field systems, and features too large to see from ground level

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two evidence types would you combine to reconstruct the diet of a past population, and what specific information would each provide?

2. A site shows a sequence of floor surfaces with hearths, postholes, and scattered pottery. Which evidence types are represented, and how would you use stratigraphy to interpret the site's history?

3. Compare and contrast artifacts and features—what can each tell us that the other cannot?

4. If you were investigating a prehistoric site with no written records, which evidence types would help you understand the community's belief systems? Explain your reasoning.

5. An FRQ asks you to evaluate the strengths and limitations of non-invasive archaeological methods. Which evidence types would you discuss, and what trade-offs would you identify between remote sensing and excavation?