Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Texas Constitution isn't a static document—it's been amended over 500 times since 1876, making it one of the most frequently modified state constitutions in the nation. This matters for your exam because these amendments reveal how Texans have responded to social movements, economic pressures, and shifting values over nearly 150 years. You're being tested on your ability to connect specific amendments to broader themes: the tension between state and federal power, the expansion of civil rights, and Texas's unique approach to local governance.
Don't just memorize dates and amendment names. Instead, focus on why each change happened and what principle it demonstrates. When you see an amendment about property taxes, think about Texas's anti-tax political culture. When you encounter voting rights changes, connect them to national movements. The amendments below are grouped by the concepts they illustrate—master these categories, and you'll be ready for any question the exam throws at you.
The most significant constitutional changes often involve who gets to participate in democracy. These amendments reflect national movements while showing Texas's specific timeline for embracing—or resisting—expanded rights.
Compare: Women's Suffrage (1919) vs. Same-Sex Marriage Ban (2005)—both amendments addressed who could access legal institutions, but they moved in opposite directions. One expanded rights; the other restricted them. If an FRQ asks about constitutional change and social attitudes, these two show how amendments can both lead and lag public opinion.
Texas has a strong tradition of local control—the idea that decisions should be made at the lowest possible level of government. These amendments reflect that philosophy while also revealing its limits.
Compare: Home Rule (1912) vs. recent state preemption laws—Home Rule expanded local authority, but modern Texas has increasingly overridden city decisions on issues like fracking bans and plastic bag ordinances. This tension between local control and state power is highly testable.
The Texas Bill of Rights (Article I) establishes fundamental liberties, but amendments have both expanded and restricted these rights over time. Understanding the post-Civil War context is essential here.
Compare: Right to Bear Arms (1875) vs. Equal Rights Amendment (1972)—both establish individual rights, but the gun rights provision emerged from post-war instability while the ERA responded to the women's liberation movement. One protects against government overreach; the other protects against discrimination.
Texas has no state income tax, making property taxes and alternative revenue sources constitutionally significant. These amendments show how Texas funds public services while maintaining its low-tax identity.
Compare: Property Tax Relief (2007) vs. Texas Lottery (1991)—both address public finance, but through opposite approaches. One reduces revenue collection; the other creates a new revenue stream. Both reflect Texas's search for alternatives to broad-based taxation.
Some amendments reflect attempts to regulate personal behavior based on prevailing moral attitudes. These often prove controversial and sometimes get reversed.
As Texas has grown, constitutional amendments have increasingly addressed long-term resource planning—particularly water, which is essential to the state's agricultural and urban economies.
Compare: Prohibition (1919) vs. Water Infrastructure (2013)—both involve state regulation of liquids, but that's where the similarity ends. Prohibition reflected moral concerns and ultimately failed; water funding reflects practical planning and has broad bipartisan support. One shows the limits of using constitutions for social control; the other shows their value for long-term resource management.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Expanding voting rights | Women's Suffrage (1919) |
| Restricting rights (later overturned) | Same-Sex Marriage Ban (2005) |
| Local control | Home Rule for Cities (1912) |
| Individual liberties | Right to Bear Arms (1875), Equal Rights Amendment (1972) |
| Alternative revenue sources | Texas Lottery (1991) |
| Tax relief | Property Tax Relief (2007) |
| Moral/social regulation | Prohibition (1919), Repeal (1935) |
| Infrastructure planning | Water Infrastructure Funding (2013) |
Which two amendments both addressed expanding participation in legal institutions, but in opposite directions—one expanding access and one restricting it?
How does the Home Rule Amendment (1912) reflect Texas's political culture of local control, and what modern trend has complicated this principle?
Compare the Right to Bear Arms (1875) and the Equal Rights Amendment (1972): What historical contexts produced each, and what type of protection does each provide?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how Texas funds public services without an income tax, which two amendments would provide the best evidence for your answer?
Why did Texas's Prohibition amendment (1919) and its repeal (1935) occur on a different timeline than federal Prohibition, and what does this reveal about Texas's political culture?