Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Defense mechanisms are central to understanding Freud's psychodynamic theory—one of the foundational perspectives you'll encounter throughout AP Psychology. These unconscious strategies reveal how the ego mediates between the demands of the id (primitive urges), the superego (moral standards), and external reality. When you're tested on personality theory in Unit 4, you're being asked to demonstrate how anxiety, unconscious motivation, and ego protection shape human behavior without our awareness.
Don't just memorize a list of eight mechanisms. Instead, focus on understanding what threat each mechanism addresses and how it transforms the original impulse. The AP exam frequently asks you to identify which defense mechanism is operating in a scenario, compare mechanisms that seem similar, or explain why Freud considered some defenses more adaptive than others. If you can categorize these mechanisms by how they work—blocking, redirecting, or transforming—you'll nail both multiple-choice identifications and FRQ explanations.
These defenses work by keeping threatening material entirely out of conscious awareness—the ego simply refuses to acknowledge what exists.
Compare: Repression vs. Denial—both block awareness, but repression pushes internal thoughts underground while denial refuses to accept external reality. On FRQs, look for whether the threat is coming from inside (repressed memory) or outside (denied diagnosis).
These defenses don't block the impulse—they redirect it toward a different person or object, changing the target while preserving the emotional energy.
Compare: Displacement vs. Projection—both involve redirecting something outward, but displacement redirects emotions to a different target while projection redirects traits by seeing them in others. A displaced person knows they're angry; a projecting person doesn't recognize the feeling as their own.
These defenses take the original unacceptable impulse and convert it into something different—either its opposite, a more primitive form, or an intellectual abstraction.
Compare: Reaction formation vs. Rationalization—reaction formation transforms the behavior itself into its opposite, while rationalization explains away the behavior after it happens. Both protect self-concept, but through different mechanisms.
Freud considered sublimation the most mature defense because it doesn't just protect the ego—it creates something valuable.
Compare: Sublimation vs. Displacement—both redirect energy outward, but displacement simply shifts to a safer target (often destructively) while sublimation transforms energy into something productive. If an FRQ asks about adaptive coping, sublimation is your go-to example.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Blocking awareness | Repression, Denial |
| Redirecting to different target | Displacement, Projection |
| Transforming into opposite | Reaction Formation |
| Returning to earlier stage | Regression |
| Cognitive justification | Rationalization |
| Productive transformation | Sublimation |
| Assessed by projective tests | Projection (theoretical basis for Rorschach, TAT) |
| Most adaptive/mature | Sublimation |
Both repression and denial block awareness of threatening material. What distinguishes whether a scenario illustrates repression versus denial?
A student who feels insecure about their intelligence constantly accuses classmates of being "show-offs" and "trying to make others look dumb." Which defense mechanism is operating, and why does this protect the student's ego?
Compare displacement and sublimation: How does each handle aggressive impulses differently, and why did Freud consider one healthier than the other?
An FRQ presents a person who experienced childhood trauma and now cannot recall those years, yet becomes extremely anxious when visiting their hometown. Identify the defense mechanism and explain how psychoanalytic therapy might address it.
Which two defense mechanisms involve expressing something opposite to or different from the original impulse? How would you distinguish between them in a multiple-choice scenario?