Language Acquisition Theories

Why This Matters

Language acquisition sits at the intersection of cognitive psychology's biggest debates: nature versus nurture, domain-specific versus domain-general learning, and individual cognition versus social construction of knowledge. When you're tested on these theories, you're really being asked to evaluate competing explanations for one of humanity's most remarkable cognitive achievements—how children master the complex system of language with seemingly little effort, often by age five.

Understanding these theories means grasping what each proposes as the primary mechanism, what evidence supports or challenges it, and how theorists respond to one another's claims. Don't just memorize names and dates—know what concept each theory illustrates about the mind's architecture and development. The exam will ask you to compare mechanisms, apply theories to scenarios, and evaluate their explanatory power.

---

Nativist Approaches: The Innate Blueprint

These theories argue that humans come pre-wired for language. The core claim is that language acquisition is too rapid and uniform across cultures to be explained by learning alone—there must be biological specialization.

Chomsky's Universal Grammar Theory

• Language Acquisition Device (LAD)—Chomsky proposed that children are born with an innate mental module specifically designed for acquiring language
• Universal Grammar refers to the underlying grammatical principles shared across all human languages, explaining why children can learn any language they're exposed to
• Poverty of the stimulus argument challenges behaviorism by noting that children produce grammatical sentences they've never heard, suggesting innate knowledge guides acquisition

---

Behaviorist and Learning-Based Approaches: Language as Learned Behavior

These theories emphasize environmental input and learning mechanisms. The core claim is that language, like any other behavior, is shaped through experience, reinforcement, and pattern detection.

Skinner's Behaviorist Theory

• Operant conditioning explains language acquisition through reinforcement—caregivers reward correct utterances and correct errors, shaping verbal behavior over time
• Imitation and shaping are central mechanisms; children learn by copying adult speech and receiving feedback that gradually refines their production
• "Verbal Behavior" (1957) was Skinner's influential book, though Chomsky's famous review argued it couldn't explain generativity—children's ability to produce novel sentences

Statistical Learning Theory

• Pattern detection allows even 8-month-old infants to segment continuous speech into words by tracking transitional probabilities between syllables
• Implicit learning occurs without conscious awareness; infants extract regularities from language input through mere exposure
• Saffran's experiments demonstrated that infants can learn artificial language patterns after just two minutes of exposure, supporting domain-general learning mechanisms

Connectionist Models of Language Acquisition

• Neural network architecture proposes that language emerges from strengthening connections between processing units based on input patterns
• Gradual learning through repeated exposure allows the system to extract rules without explicit rule representation—the "rules" emerge from weighted connections
• Past-tense learning has been modeled connectionist-style, showing how networks can produce both regular and irregular verb forms, including characteristic childhood errors

---

Cognitive-Developmental Approaches: Language Follows Thought

These theories tie language development to broader cognitive growth. The core claim is that linguistic abilities depend on underlying cognitive capacities that develop through interaction with the world.

Piaget's Cognitive Development Theory

• Cognitive prerequisites must be in place before language can emerge; children need object permanence and symbolic representation before meaningful word use
• Egocentric speech in young children reflects their cognitive limitations—they cannot yet take others' perspectives, which affects communication
• Language reflects thought rather than shaping it; linguistic development follows and depends on prior cognitive achievements in each developmental stage

---

Sociocultural and Interactionist Approaches: Language Through Social Connection

These theories emphasize that language acquisition is fundamentally a social process. The core claim is that interaction with more competent speakers provides the scaffolding necessary for language development.

Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory

• Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) describes the gap between what children can do alone and what they can achieve with guidance—language learning occurs optimally within this zone
• Language as a cognitive tool means that once acquired, language transforms thinking itself; inner speech becomes the medium for self-regulation and problem-solving
• Social origins of cognition reverse Piaget's direction: for Vygotsky, social interaction precedes and shapes individual cognitive development, including language

Bruner's Language Acquisition Support System (LASS)

• LASS complements LAD—Bruner accepted innate capacity but argued children also need a support system of caregivers who structure language input
• Scaffolding and routines like peek-a-boo and book reading create predictable formats where children can practice language with adult support
• Joint attention is critical; caregivers who follow children's gaze and label objects of shared focus facilitate faster vocabulary acquisition

Interactionist Theory

• Biological-social integration proposes that neither nature nor nurture alone explains acquisition—innate capacities require appropriate environmental input to unfold
• Child-directed speech (motherese) provides simplified, exaggerated input that may help children parse linguistic structure
• Bidirectional influence means children actively shape their language environment; their responses affect how caregivers speak to them, creating a dynamic learning system

---

Usage-Based and Input-Driven Approaches: Learning from Linguistic Experience

These theories focus on how the specific language input children receive shapes acquisition. The core claim is that frequency, context, and communicative function drive what and how children learn.

Tomasello's Usage-Based Theory

• Intention-reading is foundational; children learn language by understanding what speakers intend to communicate, not just by hearing sounds
• Item-based learning means children initially learn specific phrases and constructions, only gradually abstracting general patterns—challenging Chomsky's innate grammar
• Frequency effects matter enormously; children learn high-frequency words and constructions earlier, suggesting experience-driven rather than rule-driven acquisition

Krashen's Monitor Model

• Acquisition versus learning distinction separates unconscious, natural language pickup (acquisition) from conscious study of rules (learning)
• Input hypothesis (i+1) states that acquisition occurs when learners receive input slightly beyond their current level—comprehensible input is essential
• Affective filter describes how anxiety, motivation, and self-confidence influence whether input becomes intake; low anxiety facilitates acquisition

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two theories most directly oppose each other on whether language acquisition requires innate grammatical knowledge, and what evidence does each cite?

2. Compare Piaget's and Vygotsky's views on the relationship between language and thought—how do their proposed directions of influence differ?

3. If an infant can segment words from continuous speech after brief exposure, which theories does this evidence most strongly support, and why?

4. A caregiver points to a dog and says "Look at the doggy!" while making eye contact with their toddler. Which theories would emphasize this interaction as critical for acquisition, and what mechanisms do they propose?

5. How would Chomsky respond to Skinner's claim that children learn language through reinforcement? What key phenomenon does Chomsky argue behaviorism cannot explain?