Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Crystal systems form the foundation of how we classify and understand solid matter at the atomic level. When you're studying crystallography, you're really learning a universal language for describing symmetry, atomic arrangement, and material properties. These seven systems aren't arbitrary categories—they represent the only possible ways atoms can arrange themselves in three-dimensional space while maintaining long-range order. Every mineral, metal, and crystalline compound you'll encounter fits into one of these systems.
You're being tested on your ability to connect lattice parameters (axis lengths and angles) to symmetry operations and ultimately to material properties. Don't just memorize that cubic crystals have three equal axes at 90°—understand why that high symmetry produces isotropic behavior, and why triclinic crystals with no right angles exhibit the most complex anisotropic properties. The relationship between symmetry and physical behavior is the conceptual thread running through every exam question on this topic.
These systems feature the greatest number of symmetry operations, resulting in physical properties that are often uniform in multiple directions. The more symmetry elements a crystal possesses, the more constrained its physical behavior becomes.
Compare: Cubic vs. Hexagonal—both are high-symmetry systems, but cubic crystals are isotropic while hexagonal crystals show directional dependence along vs. perpendicular to the unique axis. If asked to explain why diamond and graphite (both pure carbon) have vastly different properties, symmetry differences are your starting point.
These systems maintain right angles between all axes but introduce inequality in axis lengths. As axis lengths diverge, symmetry decreases and anisotropic behavior emerges.
Compare: Tetragonal vs. Orthorhombic—both maintain 90° angles, but tetragonal retains one equality constraint () that orthorhombic loses. When analyzing phase diagrams, watch for tetragonal-to-orthorhombic transitions driven by symmetry-breaking distortions.
The trigonal system occupies a unique position in crystallographic classification, sharing geometric relationships with the hexagonal system while maintaining distinct symmetry operations.
Compare: Trigonal vs. Hexagonal—both can be indexed on hexagonal axes, but trigonal crystals lack the sixfold rotation that defines true hexagonal symmetry. Exam questions often test whether you can identify the symmetry operations rather than just the axis geometry.
As angular constraints relax, symmetry decreases dramatically. These systems require more sophisticated mathematical treatment because fewer symmetry operations simplify the analysis.
Compare: Monoclinic vs. Triclinic—monoclinic retains two 90° angles as a "lifeline" of symmetry, while triclinic abandons all angular constraints. FRQs may ask you to predict which system a mineral belongs to based on its physical properties—remember that lower symmetry correlates with more complex optical and mechanical behavior.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Isotropic properties (high symmetry) | Cubic: NaCl, diamond |
| Sixfold rotational symmetry | Hexagonal: quartz, graphite |
| Phase transition studies | Tetragonal: zircon, rutile |
| Anisotropic thermal/mechanical behavior | Orthorhombic: olivine, sulfur |
| Threefold symmetry / birefringence | Trigonal: calcite, tourmaline |
| Metamorphic/deformation minerals | Monoclinic: gypsum, pyroxenes |
| Minimum symmetry / complex analysis | Triclinic: feldspar, turquoise |
| Axis equality: | Cubic only |
Which two crystal systems both maintain 90° angles between all axes but differ in axis length constraints? What physical property would you expect to differ between them?
A mineral exhibits strong birefringence and threefold rotational symmetry. Which crystal system does it most likely belong to, and what distinguishes this system from the hexagonal system?
Compare and contrast the cubic and triclinic systems in terms of symmetry operations, axis parameters, and expected isotropy/anisotropy of physical properties.
Why might a material undergo a phase transition from cubic to tetragonal structure when cooled? What changes in symmetry, and what remains constant?
You're given an unknown crystal with three unequal axis lengths. What additional information would you need to determine whether it belongs to the orthorhombic, monoclinic, or triclinic system?