Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Transnational social movements are where anthropology of globalization gets real—they show you how people actually respond to global forces rather than passively accepting them. You're being tested on your understanding of how collective action crosses borders, how activists navigate cultural differences, and why some movements succeed in creating global solidarity while others fragment along national or cultural lines. These movements demonstrate core concepts like deterritorialization, global civil society, network theory, and the tension between universalism and cultural relativism.
Don't just memorize which movement fights for what cause. Instead, focus on the mechanisms: How do movements scale up from local to global? What role do NGOs, international institutions, and digital technologies play? How do activists balance universal claims (like "human rights") with respect for local contexts? When you can explain why a movement operates transnationally and how it navigates the contradictions of globalization, you're thinking like an anthropologist.
These movements directly confront the structures of global capitalism, arguing that neoliberal economic policies create winners and losers across borders. They use the very networks created by economic globalization to critique and resist it.
Compare: Anti-globalization movement vs. Fair trade movement—both critique global capitalism, but anti-globalization seeks systemic alternatives while fair trade works within market structures to reform them. If an FRQ asks about different strategies for addressing economic inequality, these two illustrate the reform vs. transformation debate.
These movements appeal to universal human dignity as a basis for transnational solidarity. They raise key anthropological questions about whether "universal" rights can accommodate cultural difference or whether they impose Western frameworks globally.
Compare: Human rights movement vs. Indigenous rights movement—both make universal claims, but Indigenous movements often critique the individualist framework of mainstream human rights, emphasizing collective rights to land, culture, and self-determination instead.
These movements foreground questions of cultural survival, historical justice, and the right to self-determination. They challenge the nation-state system and demand recognition of identities that don't fit neatly within national borders.
Compare: Indigenous rights movement vs. LGBTQ+ rights movement—both seek recognition and protection for marginalized identities, but Indigenous movements emphasize collective territorial rights and cultural continuity, while LGBTQ+ movements more often focus on individual rights and legal recognition. Both face the challenge of translating their claims across diverse cultural contexts.
These movements extend ethical concern beyond humans, challenging anthropocentric frameworks and raising questions about moral boundaries and global responsibility.
Compare: Global environmental movement vs. Fair trade movement—both address sustainability, but environmental movements focus on ecological systems while fair trade emphasizes human livelihoods. Increasingly, these movements converge around concepts like "just transition" that link environmental and social justice.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Critiques of neoliberal globalization | Anti-globalization, Fair trade, Labor rights |
| Universal rights claims | Human rights, Women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights |
| Collective vs. individual rights | Indigenous rights, Human rights |
| Market-based activism | Fair trade, Environmental (consumer campaigns) |
| Structural violence analysis | Peace movement, Labor rights, Environmental justice |
| Cultural translation challenges | LGBTQ+ rights, Women's rights, Animal rights |
| Counter-hegemonic globalization | Anti-globalization, Indigenous rights |
| Global governance engagement | Human rights, Environmental, Labor rights |
Which two movements most directly illustrate the tension between working within global capitalism versus seeking alternatives to it? What anthropological concept describes movements that use global networks to resist globalization?
How do Indigenous rights movements challenge the framework of mainstream human rights discourse? What does this reveal about the limits of universalism?
Compare the strategies used by the fair trade movement and the anti-globalization movement. Why might an anthropologist argue that fair trade represents "neoliberalism with a human face"?
If an FRQ asked you to analyze how a transnational movement navigates cultural difference, which movement would you choose and why? What specific tensions would you discuss?
How does the concept of "structural violence" connect the global peace movement to movements focused on labor rights and environmental justice? Give specific examples of how these movements frame their causes as interconnected.