Limit laws are the computational engine of calculus—they're how you actually evaluate limits without relying on tables or graphs. Every derivative you'll compute later in the course depends on these rules working seamlessly in the background. When you're tested on limits, you're really being tested on whether you can break complex expressions into manageable pieces and recognize when standard rules apply (and when they don't).
These laws demonstrate a fundamental principle: limits respect algebraic operations. That means you can pull limits apart, work with the pieces, and reassemble them—as long as certain conditions are met. The exam loves to test those conditions, especially the restrictions on the quotient rule and composite functions. Don't just memorize formulas; know why each rule works and when it fails.
Building Block Laws
These are the foundation—simple rules that establish how limits behave for the most basic functions. Every other limit law builds on these.
Limit of a Constant
The limit of any constant is itself—no matter what value x approaches, limx→ck=k
Constants don't "move" as x changes, so there's nothing to approach; the function is already at k
Foundation for the constant multiple rule—this explains why you can factor constants out of limits later
Limit of the Identity Function
The limit of x as x→c equals c—written as limx→cx=c
The identity function f(x)=x is continuous everywhere, so the limit equals the function value
Basis for polynomial limits—combined with power and sum rules, this lets you evaluate any polynomial by direct substitution
Compare: Limit of a Constant vs. Limit of x—both are "obvious" results, but they establish different behaviors. Constants ignore the input entirely; the identity function tracks it perfectly. On FRQs, these justify why direct substitution works for continuous functions.
Arithmetic Operation Laws
These rules let you break apart complex limit expressions into simpler pieces. The key insight: limits distribute over basic operations, turning one hard problem into several easy ones.
Sum/Difference Rule
Limits split across addition and subtraction—limx→c[f(x)±g(x)]=limx→cf(x)±limx→cg(x)
Both individual limits must exist for this rule to apply; if either is undefined, you need a different approach
Essential for polynomials—lets you evaluate limx→2(x2+3x−5) term by term
Product Rule
Limits distribute over multiplication—limx→c[f(x)⋅g(x)]=limx→cf(x)⋅limx→cg(x)
Both limits must exist and be finite—watch for indeterminate forms like 0⋅∞
Works for any finite number of factors—extend it to three or more functions as needed
Quotient Rule
Limits distribute over division—limx→cg(x)f(x)=limx→cg(x)limx→cf(x)
Critical restriction: denominator limit cannot be zero—if limx→cg(x)=0, this rule doesn't apply
When both limits are zero, you have the indeterminate form 00, requiring algebraic manipulation or L'Hôpital's Rule
Constant Multiple Rule
Constants factor out of limits—limx→c[k⋅f(x)]=k⋅limx→cf(x)
Direct consequence of the product rule combined with the limit of a constant
Simplifies computation—pull out coefficients first, then focus on the variable expression
Compare: Product Rule vs. Constant Multiple Rule—the constant multiple rule is actually a special case of the product rule where one function is constant. However, recognizing constants lets you simplify faster. If an FRQ asks you to justify pulling out a coefficient, cite the constant multiple rule specifically.
Power and Root Laws
These rules handle exponents and radicals, extending your toolkit to non-linear expressions. The principle: if you can find the limit of the base, you can find the limit of any power or root of it.
Power Rule
Exponents pass through limits—limx→c[f(x)]n=[limx→cf(x)]n for positive integer n
The base limit must exist—if limx→cf(x) is undefined, you can't apply this rule
Extends to polynomials—combined with sum and constant rules, this is why limx→cp(x)=p(c) for any polynomial
Root Rule
Roots pass through limits—limx→cnf(x)=nlimx→cf(x)
Restriction for even roots: the limit of the radicand must be non-negative (you can't take −4 in real numbers)
Odd roots are more flexible—3−8=−2 is valid, so odd root rules apply to negative limits too
Compare: Power Rule vs. Root Rule—both move the limit operation inside, but root rules have domain restrictions. For even roots, always verify the inner limit is non-negative. Exam questions often test this by giving you a function where limx→cf(x)<0 under a square root.
Advanced Limit Techniques
These rules handle situations where basic arithmetic laws aren't enough—nested functions and functions that resist direct evaluation.
Limits of Composite Functions
For continuous outer functions, limx→cf(g(x))=f(limx→cg(x))
Continuity of f at the inner limit is required—if limx→cg(x)=L, then f must be continuous at L
Powerful for nested expressions—evaluate limx→0sin(x2) by first finding limx→0x2=0, then sin(0)=0
Squeeze Theorem
Traps a function between two others—if h(x)≤f(x)≤g(x) and limx→ch(x)=limx→cg(x)=L, then limx→cf(x)=L
Essential for oscillating functions—classic example: limx→0x2sin(x1)=0 because −x2≤x2sin(x1)≤x2
Both bounding limits must equal the same value—if they differ, the squeeze doesn't work
Compare: Composite Function Rule vs. Squeeze Theorem—both handle "difficult" limits, but for different reasons. Use composite functions when you have nested operations and a continuous outer function. Use the Squeeze Theorem when the function oscillates or has no clean algebraic form. FRQs often require you to construct the bounding functions yourself.
Quick Reference Table
Concept
Best Examples
Basic building blocks
Limit of a Constant, Limit of x
Arithmetic operations
Sum/Difference Rule, Product Rule, Quotient Rule
Factoring out constants
Constant Multiple Rule
Handling exponents
Power Rule, Root Rule
Nested functions
Composite Function Rule
Oscillating/bounded functions
Squeeze Theorem
Direct substitution justified by
All rules combined (for continuous functions)
Indeterminate forms (rule fails)
Quotient Rule when denominator →0
Self-Check Questions
Which two limit laws together explain why you can evaluate limx→35x2 by computing 5⋅9=45?
The Quotient Rule requires a specific condition on the denominator. What is it, and what happens when that condition fails with the numerator also approaching zero?
Compare and contrast the Power Rule and Root Rule—what additional restriction applies to even roots that doesn't apply to powers?
You need to evaluate limx→0xsin(x1). Which limit law applies here, and what bounding functions would you use?
If g(x) is continuous at x=2 and limx→2f(x)=5, under what condition can you conclude that limx→2g(f(x))=g(5)?