Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Enzyme inhibition sits at the heart of medicinal chemistry—it's the mechanism behind everything from aspirin to HIV protease inhibitors. When you're tested on this material, you're not just being asked to recall definitions. You're being evaluated on whether you understand how inhibitors interact with enzymes at the molecular level and why those interactions produce specific kinetic signatures. The Lineweaver-Burk plot patterns, changes in and , and the distinction between reversible and irreversible mechanisms are all fair game.
Think of enzyme inhibition as a toolkit for drug design. Each inhibition type offers different advantages: some are easily outcompeted, others provide permanent inactivation, and still others exploit the enzyme's own catalytic machinery. Don't just memorize that competitive inhibitors increase apparent —understand why that happens and when you'd want that property in a therapeutic agent. Master the underlying principles, and you'll be able to tackle any FRQ or design problem thrown your way.
These inhibitors interact directly with the enzyme's active site through non-covalent interactions. The key principle here is competition—the inhibitor and substrate are vying for the same binding pocket, and their relative concentrations determine who wins.
Compare: Competitive inhibition vs. transition state analog inhibition—both target the active site, but transition state analogs bind far more tightly because they exploit the enzyme's catalytic mechanism. If an FRQ asks about designing a high-affinity inhibitor, transition state analogs are your go-to example.
These inhibitors bind somewhere other than the active site, causing conformational changes that reduce catalytic efficiency. The enzyme's shape changes, altering its ability to bind substrate or convert it to product.
Compare: Non-competitive vs. mixed inhibition—both involve allosteric binding, but non-competitive inhibitors show equal affinity for E and ES ( unchanged), while mixed inhibitors show preferential binding ( changes). Know this distinction for interpreting kinetic data.
These mechanisms specifically target the ES complex rather than the free enzyme. The inhibitor essentially traps the enzyme in an unproductive state after substrate has already bound.
Compare: Uncompetitive vs. substrate inhibition—both involve the ES complex, but uncompetitive inhibition requires a separate inhibitor molecule while substrate inhibition uses excess substrate itself. Substrate inhibition is a self-limiting mechanism; uncompetitive requires an external agent.
These inhibitors form permanent covalent bonds with the enzyme, eliminating catalytic activity entirely. Recovery requires synthesis of new enzyme molecules, making these inhibitors particularly useful for long-duration therapeutic effects.
Compare: Irreversible vs. suicide inhibition—both form covalent bonds, but suicide inhibitors require enzymatic activation while standard irreversible inhibitors are intrinsically reactive. Suicide inhibitors offer superior selectivity because they're only "armed" by their target enzyme.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Active site competition | Competitive inhibition, Transition state analog inhibition |
| Allosteric mechanisms | Non-competitive inhibition, Allosteric inhibition, Mixed inhibition |
| ES complex targeting | Uncompetitive inhibition, Substrate inhibition |
| Covalent inactivation | Irreversible inhibition, Suicide inhibition |
| increases, unchanged | Competitive inhibition |
| unchanged, decreases | Non-competitive inhibition |
| Both and decrease | Uncompetitive inhibition, Mixed inhibition |
| Regulatory feedback | Product inhibition, Allosteric inhibition, Substrate inhibition |
You're analyzing a Lineweaver-Burk plot and observe parallel lines when inhibitor is added. Which inhibition type produces this pattern, and what happens to and ?
Compare competitive inhibition and transition state analog inhibition. Both target the active site—why do transition state analogs typically produce much more potent drugs?
A pharmaceutical company wants to design a highly selective inhibitor that only affects one specific enzyme. Would you recommend an irreversible inhibitor or a suicide inhibitor? Justify your choice based on mechanism.
An enzyme shows decreased but unchanged in the presence of an inhibitor. The inhibitor binds equally well whether or not substrate is present. Identify the inhibition type and explain the molecular basis for the kinetic changes.
How do product inhibition and allosteric inhibition work together to regulate metabolic pathways? Provide an example of how this combination prevents overproduction of a biosynthetic end product.