What is APUSH unit 2?
What is APUSH Unit 2? Unit 2 covers colonial North America from the founding of Jamestown in 1607 to 1754, the year the French and Indian War began. It asks you to explain why different European empires built different kinds of colonies, how British regional colonies diverged from one another, and how trade, slavery, religion, and politics shaped a society that would eventually push back against British rule.
Unit 2 is about how and why colonial societies developed differently across North America, and how those differences in economy, labor, religion, and politics set the stage for later conflict with Britain.
Why did European colonies look so different?
Spain extracted wealth through the encomienda system and religious conversion. France and the Dutch built trade alliances and intermarried with Native nations to sustain the fur trade. England sent large numbers of settlers who farmed land taken from Native peoples, producing regional colonies with distinct economies and social structures.
How did the British colonies divide regionally?
New England centered on Puritan towns, family farms, and mixed commerce. The Middle Colonies attracted diverse European migrants and exported cereal crops. The Chesapeake and Southern colonies built plantation economies on tobacco and rice, first using indentured servants and then increasingly relying on enslaved Africans.
What forces pushed colonists toward independence?
Salutary neglect allowed colonial assemblies like the Virginia House of Burgesses to develop real governing experience. The First Great Awakening challenged religious and social authority. Enlightenment ideas about liberty and corruption gave colonists a framework to criticize British imperial control, especially over trade and frontier policy.
The big idea: Diversity produces tensionThe defining pattern of Unit 2 is that colonial diversity, regional, religious, ethnic, and economic, created societies that were increasingly difficult for Britain to govern as a single coherent empire. By 1754, colonists had developed local political habits, transatlantic print culture, and ideological grievances that made imperial tightening feel like a threat rather than a benefit.
Unit 2 review notes
2.1
Contextualizing Period 2
Topic 2.1 asks you to set up the big picture before diving into specifics. The period 1607 to 1754 is defined by competing European empires, the growth of the Atlantic economy, and the transformation of Native American societies through trade and disease. Keep these three threads in mind as you move through the unit.
- Imperial competition: Spain, France, the Dutch, and England all pursued different economic and political goals in North America, leading to overlapping claims and frequent conflict.
- Atlantic economy: An interconnected system linking Europe, Africa, and the Americas through the exchange of goods, enslaved people, and raw materials.
- Salutary neglect: Britain's informal policy of loosely enforcing trade laws allowed colonial assemblies to develop governing experience and a taste for self-rule.
- Demographic disruption: European diseases caused catastrophic population loss among Native nations, reshaping political alliances and land availability across the continent.
Can you explain two ways that European imperial rivalry shaped the conditions colonists faced between 1607 and 1754?
2.2
European Colonization Models
Each European power colonized with different goals, methods, and relationships with Native peoples. The AP exam frequently asks you to compare these models, so know the specific mechanisms each empire used.
- Spanish encomienda system: Granted colonists the right to extract labor and tribute from Native peoples, combining economic exploitation with forced Christianization.
- French and Dutch trade alliances: Both empires relied on relatively few European settlers and built economic relationships through fur trade partnerships and intermarriage with Native nations.
- English settler colonialism: England attracted large numbers of male and female migrants seeking land, social mobility, and religious freedom, leading to agricultural settlements that displaced Native peoples.
- Joint-stock companies: Business structures like the Virginia Company pooled investor capital to fund risky colonial ventures, linking private profit to imperial expansion.
What was the key difference between how France and England organized their relationships with Native peoples, and why did that difference matter economically?
| Empire | Primary goal | Labor system | Native relationship |
|---|
| Spain | Resource extraction and conversion | Encomienda, enslaved Africans | Subjugation and incorporation |
| France | Fur trade | Few settlers, trade partnerships | Alliance and intermarriage |
| Dutch | Fur and commercial trade | Few settlers, trade partnerships | Alliance and intermarriage |
| England | Agriculture and settlement | Indentured servants, then enslaved Africans | Displacement and conflict |
2.3
The Regions of British Colonies
The four British colonial regions developed distinct economies, labor systems, and social structures based on geography, climate, and the crops or commerce each region could sustain. Knowing these regional differences is essential for comparison questions.
- Chesapeake colonies: Virginia and Maryland built tobacco plantation economies, first using white male indentured servants and then shifting to enslaved Africans as the primary labor force.
- New England colonies: Puritan settlers organized around small towns and family farms, developing a mixed economy of agriculture and commerce including fishing, shipbuilding, and trade.
- Middle colonies: New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware exported cereal crops and attracted diverse European migrants, producing greater ethnic, cultural, and religious pluralism than other regions.
- Southern Atlantic and West Indies colonies: Long growing seasons supported plantation economies producing rice, indigo, and sugar, with enslaved Africans often constituting the majority of the population.
Why did the Chesapeake shift from indentured servants to enslaved Africans as its primary labor source in the late 17th century?
| Region | Key export | Primary labor | Social character |
|---|
| New England | Fish, timber, trade goods | Family labor, few enslaved | Puritan towns, town meetings |
| Middle Colonies | Wheat, grain | Mixed free and some enslaved | Diverse, tolerant, commercial |
| Chesapeake | Tobacco | Indentured servants, then enslaved | Planter elite, hierarchical |
| Southern Atlantic and West Indies | Rice, indigo, sugar | Majority enslaved | Plantation-dominated, high mortality |
2.4
Transatlantic Trade
The Atlantic economy connected Europe, Africa, and the Americas in a system that moved commodities, enslaved people, and manufactured goods. British mercantilist policy, enforced through the Navigation Acts, tried to channel colonial trade to benefit the mother country.
- Triangular trade: A multi-directional exchange in which manufactured goods went to Africa, enslaved Africans were transported to the Americas via the Middle Passage, and colonial commodities flowed back to Europe.
- Navigation Acts: English laws requiring colonial goods to be shipped on English vessels and routed through English ports, subordinating colonial trade to mercantilist goals.
- Mercantilism: The economic theory that colonies existed to enrich the mother country by providing raw materials and consuming manufactured goods, justifying tight imperial trade regulation.
- Impact on Native economies: European trade goods flowed into Native communities, stimulating cultural and economic change while also spreading epidemic diseases that caused severe population loss.
How did the Navigation Acts reflect mercantilist theory, and why did colonial merchants sometimes resist them?
2.5
Interactions Between American Indians and Europeans
Native American nations were not passive recipients of European contact. They formed strategic alliances, resisted encroachment, and adapted diplomatically. The AP exam expects you to show how these interactions changed over time and varied by region.
- Metacom's War (King Philip's War): A 1675 to 1676 conflict in New England between British colonists and a coalition of Native nations led by Metacom, triggered by land encroachment and political pressure on Native sovereignty.
- Pueblo Revolt: A 1680 uprising of Pueblo peoples against Spanish rule in present-day New Mexico that drove the Spanish out temporarily and forced Spain to accommodate some aspects of Pueblo culture after reconquest.
- Covenant Chain: A diplomatic alliance between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and British colonists that showed how Native nations used formal political relationships to maintain power and negotiate with Europeans.
- Alliance and conflict: French, Dutch, British, and Spanish colonies all armed and allied with Native groups, who in turn used these relationships to pursue their own interests against rival Native nations and European powers.
Compare the outcomes of Metacom's War and the Pueblo Revolt. What did each reveal about the limits of European colonial power?
2.6
Slavery in the British Colonies
Slavery developed unevenly across British North America but became legally entrenched everywhere. The shift from indentured servitude to chattel slavery was driven by economic demand, declining servant supply, and deliberate legal construction of racial hierarchy.
- Chattel slavery: A legal system treating enslaved people as permanent, inheritable property, codified in colonial slave codes that prohibited interracial relationships and defined the children of enslaved mothers as enslaved in perpetuity.
- Bacon's Rebellion (1676): An armed uprising in Virginia involving both poor white settlers and enslaved people that alarmed planters and accelerated the shift toward racial slavery as a more controllable labor system.
- Middle Passage: The brutal transatlantic voyage that transported enslaved Africans to the Americas under inhumane conditions, with high mortality rates.
- Resistance to slavery: Enslaved Africans used both overt resistance such as the 1739 Stono Rebellion and covert means including work slowdowns, cultural retention, and maintaining family and religious practices to resist dehumanization.
Why did all British colonies participate in the Atlantic slave trade even though the plantation system was concentrated in the South and West Indies?
2.7
Colonial Society and Culture
By the mid-18th century, colonial culture was shaped by Anglicization, religious revival, Enlightenment ideas, and growing tensions between colonial self-interest and British imperial authority. These forces together produced a colonial identity distinct from Britain.
- First Great Awakening: A wave of Protestant revivalism in the 1730s and 1740s led by preachers like Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield that challenged established religious authority, promoted emotional personal faith, and fostered intercolonial connections.
- Anglicization: The gradual adoption of English political models, legal traditions, and cultural practices by colonial societies, which paradoxically gave colonists the vocabulary to criticize British overreach.
- Enlightenment ideas: European philosophical emphasis on reason, natural rights, and skepticism of corrupt authority, absorbed by colonial thinkers like Benjamin Franklin and later used to justify resistance to imperial control.
- Colonial self-government: Institutions like the Virginia House of Burgesses and New England town meetings gave colonists practical experience with representative governance and a strong expectation of local control.
- Transatlantic print culture: The spread of newspapers, pamphlets, and books across the Atlantic created shared political and intellectual conversations that connected colonists to each other and to European ideas.
How did the First Great Awakening and Enlightenment ideas both challenge traditional authority in colonial society, even though they came from very different sources?
2.8
Comparison in Period 2
Topic 2.8 is the synthesis and comparison topic for the unit. The AP exam expects you to compare colonial regions and European empires across multiple dimensions. Use this section to pull together the patterns you have studied.
- Regional comparison skill: Comparing New England, Middle, Chesapeake, and Southern colonies across labor systems, economies, religious character, and political culture is a core AP task for this period.
- Imperial model comparison: Spanish, French, Dutch, and English colonization differed in settler numbers, labor systems, Native relationships, and economic goals, producing fundamentally different colonial societies.
- Continuity and change: Across 1607 to 1754, labor systems shifted from indentured servitude to chattel slavery, Native power declined through war and disease, and colonial political culture grew more assertive.
Choose two British colonial regions and explain how geography and labor systems produced different social structures in each.
| Dimension | New England | Chesapeake | Middle Colonies | Southern Atlantic |
|---|
| Economy | Mixed agriculture and commerce | Tobacco plantation | Grain export | Rice, indigo, sugar plantation |
| Labor | Family and wage labor | Indentured then enslaved | Mixed free and enslaved | Majority enslaved |
| Religion | Puritan Congregationalism | Anglican | Diverse and tolerant | Anglican with diversity |
| Self-governance | Town meetings | House of Burgesses | Proprietary assemblies | Planter-dominated assemblies |
Practice APUSH unit 2 questions
Try AP-style multiple-choice questions and written prompts after you review the notes.
QuestionIn 1740 a Maryland Catholic planter petitioned the governor, invoking Maryland's founding commitment to religious tolerance. What does this reveal about his intended audience and purpose?
He invoked Maryland's founding to urge the governor to uphold tolerance.
He treated historical precedent as persuasive, not an automatic legal guarantee.
No legal rule required referencing founding documents in petitions.
Catholic landownership was established; he appealed over specific threats to property.
QuestionHow did differing French and British settlement patterns reveal the nature of European colonial competition in North America?
French interior trade focus versus British territorial expansion shaped Indigenous alliances.
British coastal choices stemmed from agricultural and trade goals, not naval superiority.
French interior settlement reflected fur-trade strategy, not fear of British naval power.
Environment influenced settlement viability, but imperial strategy mainly determined locations.
"When the (large ship) departed, …those of us that had money, spare clothes, credit to give bills of payment, gold rings, fur, or any such commodities, were ever welcome to [purchase supplies. The rest of us patiently obeyed our] vile commanders and [bought] our provisions at fifteen times the value,…yet did not repine but fasted, lest we should incur the censure of [being] factious and seditious persons…. Our ordinary [food] was but meal and water so that this…little relieved our wants, whereby with the extremity of the bitter cold frost…more than half of us died.
The worst [among us were the gold seekers who] with their golden promises made all men their slaves in hope of recompenses. There was no talk…but dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, load gold…. Smith, perceiving [we lived] from hand to mouth, caused the pinnace [small ship] to be provided with things fitting to get provision for the year following. [Two councillors] Wingfield and Kendall,…strengthened themselves with the sailors and other confederates [and planned to go] aboard the pinnace to alter her course and to go for England. Smith had the plot discovered to him. Much trouble he had to prevent it, till with…musket shot he forced them to stay or sink in the river; which action cost the life of Captain Kendall. These brawls are so disgustful, as some will say, they were better forgotten."
Captain John Smith, History of Virginia, 1624.
A.Describe ONE challenge facing the Jamestown colonists as depicted in the excerpt from Captain John Smith's History of Virginia.
B.Explain ONE reason why the pursuit of gold by Jamestown colonists, as described in the excerpt, contributed to the colony's early struggles.
C.Explain ONE way in which the economic motivations described in the excerpt were similar to those of other European colonizers in the Americas during the period 1491–1607.
Evaluate the extent to which the American emphasis on individualism conflicted with efforts to build community and pursue social reform in the period from 1776 to 1900.
In your response you should do the following:
Respond to the prompt with a historically defensible thesis or claim that establishes a line of reasoning.
Describe a broader historical context relevant to the prompt.
Support an argument using at least four of the provided documents.
Use at least one additional piece of specific historical evidence beyond the documents.
For at least two documents, explain how or why the document's point of view, purpose, historical situation, or audience is relevant.
Demonstrate a complex understanding through sophisticated argumentation and/or effective use of evidence.
- Respond to parts A, B, and C.