key term - Non-Rivalry

Definition

Non-rivalry is a key characteristic of public goods, where the consumption of a good or service by one individual does not reduce the availability or quality of that good or service for consumption by others. In other words, one person's use of the good does not diminish the ability of others to use it as well.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Non-rivalry means that one person's consumption of a public good does not reduce the amount available for others to consume.
2. Examples of non-rivalrous public goods include national defense, public parks, and street lighting, where one person's use of the good does not diminish its availability to others.
3. The non-rivalry of public goods leads to the problem of free-riding, where individuals can benefit from the good without contributing to its provision.
4. Non-rivalry implies that the optimal price for a public good is zero, as charging any positive price would exclude some users and lead to underutilization of the good.
5. The non-rivalry of public goods creates challenges for efficient allocation and provision, as the market often fails to provide the socially optimal quantity of these goods.

Review Questions

• Explain how the non-rivalry of public goods leads to the problem of free-riding.
  • The non-rivalry of public goods means that one person's consumption of the good does not reduce its availability for others. This creates an incentive for individuals to free-ride, where they can benefit from the good without contributing to its provision. Since no one can be excluded from using the public good, people may choose not to pay for it, hoping to enjoy the benefits without incurring the cost. This free-riding behavior can result in the under-provision of public goods, as the market fails to provide the socially optimal quantity.
• Describe the implications of non-rivalry for the optimal pricing of public goods.
  • The non-rivalry of public goods means that the marginal cost of an additional user is zero. This implies that the optimal price for a public good should be set at zero, as charging any positive price would exclude some users and lead to underutilization of the good. Pricing a public good above the marginal cost of zero would result in a deadweight loss, as some individuals who value the good more than the cost of providing it would be excluded. Therefore, the non-rivalry of public goods suggests that they should be provided free of charge or at a price that does not exceed the marginal cost of an additional user.
• Analyze how the non-rivalry of public goods creates challenges for their efficient allocation and provision.
  • The non-rivalry of public goods means that one person's consumption does not reduce the availability for others. This characteristic creates challenges for the efficient allocation and provision of these goods. Since the marginal cost of an additional user is zero, the market often fails to provide the socially optimal quantity of public goods, as private firms have no incentive to produce them. The non-rivalry also leads to the problem of free-riding, where individuals can benefit from the good without contributing to its provision. As a result, public goods are often underprovided, and their efficient allocation requires government intervention, such as taxation, subsidies, or direct provision, to ensure that the socially optimal quantity is made available.

Related terms

Public Goods:

Public goods are goods or services that are non-rivalrous and non-excludable, meaning they can be consumed by everyone without reducing the availability for others and no one can be prevented from using them.

Non-Excludability: Non-excludability is another defining feature of public goods, where it is impossible or extremely costly to prevent people from accessing and using the good or service.

Marginal Cost:

Marginal cost refers to the additional cost of producing one more unit of a good or service. For non-rivalrous public goods, the marginal cost of an additional user is zero.