🥸intro to psychology review

key term - Research Design

Definition

Research design refers to the overall strategy or blueprint that guides the planning, implementation, and analysis of a research study. It outlines the methods and procedures used to collect, analyze, and interpret data in order to answer the research question(s) or test hypotheses.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Research design is a crucial component of the scientific method, as it ensures the validity and reliability of the research findings.
  2. The choice of research design depends on the research question, the nature of the variables, and the level of control the researcher has over the study environment.
  3. Experimental designs allow for the establishment of causal relationships by manipulating the independent variable(s) and controlling for confounding factors.
  4. Correlational designs explore the strength and direction of relationships between variables, but cannot establish causality.
  5. Observational designs provide a detailed, in-depth understanding of phenomena in their natural setting, but lack the ability to manipulate variables.

Review Questions

  • Explain how the choice of research design is influenced by the research question and the variables involved.
    • The research question and the nature of the variables under investigation are key factors that guide the selection of an appropriate research design. For example, if the goal is to determine the causal effect of an intervention on an outcome, an experimental design would be suitable. On the other hand, if the aim is to explore the relationship between two naturally occurring variables, a correlational design would be more appropriate. The level of control the researcher has over the study environment and the ability to manipulate variables are also important considerations in choosing the research design.
  • Discuss the strengths and limitations of experimental, correlational, and observational research designs.
    • Experimental designs are considered the gold standard for establishing causal relationships, as they allow researchers to manipulate the independent variable(s) and control for confounding factors. However, they may lack external validity and can be more resource-intensive. Correlational designs are useful for exploring relationships between variables, but cannot determine causality. Observational designs provide rich, in-depth understanding of phenomena in their natural setting, but lack the ability to manipulate variables and establish causal links. The choice of research design should be guided by the research question, the nature of the variables, and the level of control the researcher has over the study environment.
  • Evaluate how the research design can influence the validity and reliability of research findings.
    • The research design has a significant impact on the validity and reliability of the research findings. Experimental designs, with their ability to manipulate variables and control for confounding factors, generally have higher internal validity, allowing researchers to make stronger causal inferences. Correlational designs, on the other hand, may be more susceptible to threats to internal validity, such as the influence of third variables. Observational designs can provide high ecological validity by studying phenomena in their natural setting, but may face challenges in ensuring consistent and reliable data collection. Careful consideration of the research design, including the sampling method, measurement techniques, and data analysis procedures, is crucial for enhancing the overall quality and trustworthiness of the research findings.