🦢constitutional law i review

key term - John Marshall

Definition

John Marshall was the fourth Chief Justice of the United States, serving from 1801 to 1835, and is best known for establishing the principle of judicial review and strengthening the power of the Supreme Court. His leadership helped shape the American legal system and defined the role of the judiciary in relation to the other branches of government. Through landmark cases, he set precedents that affirmed federal authority and promoted a broad interpretation of constitutional powers.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. John Marshall served as Chief Justice for over 30 years, making him one of the longest-serving justices in U.S. history.
  2. In Marbury v. Madison (1803), Marshall established judicial review, allowing the Supreme Court to invalidate laws that conflict with the Constitution.
  3. His decision in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) reinforced federal supremacy over state laws and affirmed implied powers for Congress.
  4. Marshall's opinions often favored a strong national government, which led to significant developments in federalism and constitutional interpretation.
  5. He influenced many subsequent cases, ensuring that the Supreme Court became a co-equal branch of government alongside Congress and the presidency.

Review Questions

  • How did John Marshall's decisions in landmark cases contribute to the establishment of judicial review?
    • John Marshall's decisions were crucial in establishing judicial review, particularly through his ruling in Marbury v. Madison. In this case, he asserted that it was the duty of the judiciary to interpret the law and ensure that no act of Congress could supersede the Constitution. This landmark decision not only affirmed the Supreme Court's authority to strike down unconstitutional laws but also solidified its role as a co-equal branch of government alongside Congress and the presidency.
  • In what ways did John Marshall's interpretation of federalism impact state vs. federal authority?
    • John Marshall's interpretation of federalism significantly tilted power toward the federal government. His rulings often emphasized that federal laws had supremacy over state laws, as seen in cases like McCulloch v. Maryland. By affirming implied powers and rejecting state interference with federal institutions, Marshall reinforced a strong national government and set precedents that limited states' abilities to challenge federal authority.
  • Evaluate how John Marshall’s legacy influences contemporary understanding of constitutional law and judicial authority.
    • John Marshall’s legacy continues to shape contemporary constitutional law by establishing principles that define judicial authority and federalism today. His emphasis on judicial review laid the groundwork for how courts operate within the framework of checks and balances among branches of government. As debates over states’ rights versus federal power persist, Marshall's interpretations still resonate, guiding current justices as they navigate complex legal challenges while upholding constitutional principles.