key term - Misconduct by jurors

Definition

Misconduct by jurors refers to inappropriate behavior or actions taken by jurors during a trial that can potentially influence the fairness and integrity of the legal process. This can include actions such as discussing the case outside the jury room, conducting independent investigations, or being exposed to prejudicial information not presented in court. Such misconduct can lead to questions about the validity of the jury's decision and may result in motions for a new trial.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. Juror misconduct can involve actions like discussing the case with non-jurors, using social media to communicate about the case, or bringing outside information into deliberations.
2. If misconduct is proven, it may be grounds for a judge to declare a mistrial or grant a motion for a new trial.
3. Judges take allegations of juror misconduct seriously and will often conduct an investigation to determine the validity of such claims.
4. Common examples of misconduct include jurors conducting independent research or failing to disclose personal biases during voir dire.
5. The legal system generally emphasizes the importance of jury impartiality, so any hint of misconduct can undermine public confidence in the judicial process.

Review Questions

• What are some common examples of juror misconduct that could impact a trial's outcome?
  • Common examples of juror misconduct include discussing the case with non-jurors, conducting independent research on case-related topics, or using social media platforms to share opinions about the trial. These actions can introduce external influences that compromise the integrity of the jury's decision-making process. If discovered, such misconduct can lead to serious repercussions, including motions for a new trial and potential mistrials.
• Discuss how courts typically address allegations of juror misconduct and what steps are taken to ensure a fair trial.
  • When allegations of juror misconduct arise, courts typically initiate an investigation to assess the claims' validity. This may involve interviewing jurors, reviewing trial records, and evaluating any evidence related to the alleged misconduct. Depending on the findings, judges have the discretion to dismiss individual jurors, declare a mistrial, or grant a motion for a new trial if it is determined that the misconduct impacted the jury's impartiality. Ensuring fairness in trials is essential to maintaining public confidence in the justice system.
• Evaluate how juror misconduct can affect public perceptions of the legal system and its processes.
  • Juror misconduct can significantly impact public perceptions of the legal system by raising concerns about fairness and justice. When jurors engage in improper behavior that undermines their impartiality, it creates skepticism about trial outcomes and can lead to doubts about whether justice was served. High-profile cases involving alleged juror misconduct often garner media attention, further influencing public opinion. If people believe that trials are compromised by juror misconduct, it can erode trust in legal institutions and deter individuals from participating in jury service.

Related terms

Jury Tampering: The illegal act of attempting to influence a juror's decision through bribery, coercion, or other improper means.

Voir Dire: The process of jury selection where potential jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and biases to ensure a fair and impartial jury.

Mistrial: A trial that is invalid due to an error in the proceedings, often caused by issues such as juror misconduct or other factors that compromise the fairness of the trial.