Intro to Time Series

Intro to Time Series Unit 7 – Model Selection & Diagnostic Checking

Model selection and diagnostic checking are crucial steps in time series analysis. They involve choosing the best model from candidates based on performance and complexity, while ensuring the selected model meets assumptions and fits the data well. Key techniques include residual analysis, information criteria like AIC and BIC, and cross-validation. These methods help balance model fit and complexity, prevent overfitting, and ensure the chosen model accurately captures the underlying patterns in the time series data.

Got a Unit Test this week?

we crunched the numbers and here's the most likely topics on your next test

Key Concepts

  • Model selection involves choosing the best model from a set of candidate models based on their performance and complexity
  • Diagnostic checking assesses the adequacy of a selected model by examining its assumptions, residuals, and goodness-of-fit
  • Residual analysis investigates the differences between observed and predicted values to identify patterns, outliers, or heteroscedasticity
    • Residuals should be normally distributed, independent, and have constant variance
  • Information criteria, such as Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), balance model fit and complexity
    • Lower values of AIC and BIC indicate better models
  • Cross-validation techniques, like k-fold cross-validation, assess model performance on unseen data and help prevent overfitting
  • Parsimony principle suggests selecting the simplest model that adequately explains the data, avoiding unnecessary complexity

Model Selection Criteria

  • Goodness-of-fit measures, such as R-squared and adjusted R-squared, evaluate how well the model fits the data
    • R-squared represents the proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by the model
    • Adjusted R-squared accounts for the number of predictors and penalizes complex models
  • Mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) quantify the average squared difference between observed and predicted values
  • Mean absolute error (MAE) measures the average absolute difference between observed and predicted values, providing a more interpretable metric
  • Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) balance model fit and complexity, favoring simpler models
    • AIC is defined as AIC=2k2ln(L)AIC = 2k - 2ln(L), where kk is the number of parameters and LL is the likelihood of the model
    • BIC is defined as BIC=ln(n)k2ln(L)BIC = ln(n)k - 2ln(L), where nn is the sample size
  • Mallow's Cp statistic compares the performance of subset models to the full model, helping identify the optimal subset of predictors

Diagnostic Tests

  • Ljung-Box test assesses the presence of autocorrelation in the residuals, indicating if the model has captured all the temporal dependence
  • Durbin-Watson test checks for first-order autocorrelation in the residuals, with values close to 2 suggesting no autocorrelation
  • Breusch-Godfrey test is a more general test for higher-order autocorrelation in the residuals
  • Jarque-Bera test evaluates the normality of residuals by comparing the skewness and kurtosis to those of a normal distribution
  • Engle's ARCH test checks for the presence of autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) effects in the residuals
  • Ramsey's RESET test assesses the functional form of the model, checking for omitted variables or incorrect specification
  • Chow test examines the stability of model parameters across different subsamples or time periods

Residual Analysis

  • Residuals are the differences between observed and predicted values, representing the unexplained part of the data
  • Standardized residuals are residuals divided by their standard deviation, making them comparable across different models
  • Residual plots, such as residuals vs. fitted values or residuals vs. time, help identify patterns, outliers, or heteroscedasticity
    • Residuals should be randomly scattered around zero with no discernible patterns
  • Autocorrelation function (ACF) and partial autocorrelation function (PACF) plots of residuals reveal any remaining temporal dependence
    • ACF measures the correlation between residuals at different lags
    • PACF measures the correlation between residuals at different lags, controlling for the effect of intermediate lags
  • Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot compares the distribution of residuals to a theoretical normal distribution, assessing normality
  • Residual analysis helps detect model misspecification, outliers, and violations of assumptions

Information Criteria

  • Information criteria are used to compare and select models based on their fit and complexity
  • Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) estimates the relative amount of information lost by a model, balancing fit and complexity
    • AIC is defined as AIC=2k2ln(L)AIC = 2k - 2ln(L), where kk is the number of parameters and LL is the likelihood of the model
    • Lower AIC values indicate better models
  • Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) is similar to AIC but places a stronger penalty on model complexity, favoring simpler models
    • BIC is defined as BIC=ln(n)k2ln(L)BIC = ln(n)k - 2ln(L), where nn is the sample size
  • Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQIC) is another variant that balances fit and complexity, with a penalty term between AIC and BIC
  • Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) is used for Bayesian model comparison, considering the posterior distribution of model parameters
  • Information criteria are useful for comparing non-nested models or models with different numbers of parameters

Model Comparison Techniques

  • Likelihood ratio test compares the fit of two nested models, assessing if the more complex model significantly improves the fit
    • The test statistic follows a chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters
  • Wald test evaluates the significance of individual or groups of parameters in a model, testing if they are significantly different from zero
  • Lagrange multiplier test assesses if adding additional parameters to a model would significantly improve its fit
  • Diebold-Mariano test compares the forecast accuracy of two models, determining if one model outperforms the other
  • Encompassing test examines if one model's forecasts contain all the relevant information captured by another model's forecasts
  • Forecast encompassing test assesses if combining forecasts from different models improves overall forecast accuracy
  • Model confidence set (MCS) procedure identifies a set of models that have the best performance, with a given level of confidence

Practical Applications

  • Model selection and diagnostic checking are crucial in various fields, such as economics, finance, and environmental studies
  • In finance, selecting the best model for asset pricing, risk management, or portfolio optimization helps make informed investment decisions
    • Example: Comparing GARCH models with different lag structures to forecast stock market volatility
  • In economics, choosing the appropriate model for forecasting macroeconomic variables, like GDP or inflation, guides policy decisions
    • Example: Selecting between VAR and VECM models to analyze the relationship between interest rates and economic growth
  • In environmental studies, model selection helps identify the key factors influencing climate change or air pollution levels
    • Example: Comparing regression models with different sets of predictors to explain variations in global temperature
  • Diagnostic checking ensures that the selected model is reliable, stable, and provides accurate predictions
  • Model comparison techniques help researchers choose between competing models and assess their relative performance
  • Information criteria are widely used for model selection in various applications, such as time series analysis, panel data analysis, and machine learning

Common Pitfalls and Solutions

  • Overfitting occurs when a model is too complex and fits the noise in the data, leading to poor performance on new data
    • Solution: Use regularization techniques, such as Lasso or Ridge regression, to shrink the coefficients of less important predictors
  • Underfitting happens when a model is too simple and fails to capture the underlying patterns in the data
    • Solution: Consider more complex models or include additional relevant predictors
  • Multicollinearity arises when predictors are highly correlated, making it difficult to interpret their individual effects
    • Solution: Use variable selection techniques, such as stepwise regression or principal component analysis, to reduce dimensionality
  • Autocorrelation in residuals violates the assumption of independence and can lead to biased standard errors and inefficient estimates
    • Solution: Use HAC (heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent) standard errors or consider ARMA models to account for autocorrelation
  • Heteroscedasticity occurs when the variance of residuals is not constant across different levels of the predictors
    • Solution: Use weighted least squares or transform the variables to stabilize the variance
  • Outliers can heavily influence the model estimates and lead to biased results
    • Solution: Use robust regression techniques, such as M-estimators or Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) regression, to minimize the impact of outliers
  • Ignoring model uncertainty can lead to overconfident inferences and poor decisions
    • Solution: Use model averaging techniques, such as Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), to account for model uncertainty and obtain more reliable predictions


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.