The collateral source rule in tort law prevents defendants from reducing their liability based on compensation the plaintiff received from other sources. This ensures wrongdoers are held fully accountable for their actions, even if it results in the plaintiff receiving double recovery.
Common collateral sources include health insurance, workers' compensation, and disability benefits. While some jurisdictions have exceptions, the rule generally applies unless the plaintiff didn't pay for the benefit or if subrogation or reimbursement is involved.
Collateral Source Rule
Collateral source rule definition
Top images from around the web for Collateral source rule definition
Tort Law - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original
Is this image relevant?
Agency – Fundamentals of Business Law View original
Is this image relevant?
Tort Law - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 6 image View original
Is this image relevant?
Tort Law - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original
Is this image relevant?
Agency – Fundamentals of Business Law View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Collateral source rule definition
Tort Law - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original
Is this image relevant?
Agency – Fundamentals of Business Law View original
Is this image relevant?
Tort Law - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal 6 image View original
Is this image relevant?
Tort Law - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original
Is this image relevant?
Agency – Fundamentals of Business Law View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
- Legal principle in tort law states compensation or benefits received by injured party from third party (collateral source) should not be deducted from damages owed by tortfeasor
- Applies in tort cases when plaintiff receives compensation for injuries from sources other than defendant, such as insurance or government benefits
- Defendant still liable for full amount of damages
- Cannot use fact that plaintiff has received compensation from other sources to reduce own liability
Rationale and impact on damages
- Ensures tortfeasor held fully responsible for harm caused, regardless of any benefits plaintiff may receive from other sources
- Prevents wrongdoer from benefiting from plaintiff's foresight or good fortune in having other sources of compensation
- Plaintiff can recover full amount of damages from defendant, even if already compensated by other sources
- Can result in plaintiff receiving double recovery, as may receive compensation from both defendant and collateral source
- Considered acceptable to ensure defendant held fully accountable for actions
Common collateral benefit sources
- Health insurance
- Plaintiffs may have medical expenses covered by own health insurance or through spouse's or parent's insurance plan
- Workers' compensation
- If injury occurred in course of employment, plaintiff may be eligible for workers' compensation benefits
- Disability insurance
- Plaintiffs may have disability insurance that provides income replacement if unable to work due to injuries
- Life insurance
- In wrongful death cases, deceased's life insurance benefits may be considered collateral source
- Government benefits
- Plaintiffs may receive benefits from government programs (Social Security Disability, Medicaid) which can cover medical expenses or provide income support
Exceptions to collateral source rule
- Some jurisdictions have enacted statutes that allow for introduction of evidence regarding collateral source payments in certain circumstances
- Exceptions may apply to specific types of cases (medical malpractice, product liability)
- Rule may not apply if plaintiff has not paid for benefit or if benefit is subject to subrogation or reimbursement
- Subrogation allows collateral source provider to seek reimbursement from plaintiff's recovery for benefits paid
- Reimbursement agreements may require plaintiff to repay collateral source from any settlement or judgment received
- In some cases, courts may allow evidence of collateral source payments to be admitted for limited purposes
- To prove malingering or to impeach plaintiff's credibility
- Generally not admissible to reduce defendant's liability for damages
Key Terms to Review (14)
California's Approach: California's Approach refers to the state's unique interpretation and application of the Collateral Source Rule, which allows plaintiffs to recover damages without deducting amounts received from independent sources like insurance or government benefits. This means that even if a plaintiff has received compensation from another source for their injuries, that amount will not reduce the damages they can claim in court, fostering a more favorable outcome for injured parties.
Collateral Source Rule: The collateral source rule is a legal doctrine that prevents a defendant from reducing their liability for damages by introducing evidence that the injured party has received compensation from other sources, such as insurance or social security. This rule is based on the principle that a wrongdoer should not benefit from the injured party's insurance coverage or other support systems. Essentially, it ensures that plaintiffs are compensated fully for their losses without any deductions for amounts they may have received from collateral sources.
Double recovery: Double recovery occurs when a plaintiff receives compensation more than once for the same injury or loss, typically through various sources like insurance or settlements. This concept is important because it can lead to unjust enrichment, where the injured party benefits disproportionately from their losses. The legal system generally aims to prevent double recovery to maintain fairness and integrity in compensation practices.
Economic damages: Economic damages refer to the monetary compensation awarded in a legal case to cover financial losses incurred by a plaintiff due to another's negligence or wrongful conduct. These damages include tangible costs like medical bills, lost wages, and property damage, providing a way for victims to recover their out-of-pocket expenses. The calculation of economic damages often focuses on objective financial metrics rather than subjective factors like pain and suffering.
Fault: Fault refers to the legal concept of responsibility or blameworthiness for a wrongful act or omission that causes harm to another party. It plays a crucial role in determining liability, especially in tort law, where establishing fault can dictate whether a defendant is held accountable for damages. Understanding fault is essential when evaluating claims related to harm, as it encompasses various standards of behavior and levels of intent that can affect the outcome of legal disputes.
Gordon v. State Farm: Gordon v. State Farm is a significant legal case that addressed the collateral source rule, which allows a plaintiff to recover damages for their injuries without deducting benefits received from other sources, like insurance. In this case, the court examined how the collateral source rule applies when determining damages in tort claims and the extent to which an insurer's payments impact a plaintiff's recovery. This ruling has implications for how courts view compensation from third-party sources and how it relates to a plaintiff's right to full recovery.
Hoffman v. Board of Education: Hoffman v. Board of Education is a notable case that examined the implications of the collateral source rule in tort law. This case involved a claim for damages related to a personal injury sustained by the plaintiff, where the court had to consider how benefits received from a collateral source should affect the plaintiff's recovery in the context of their claim against the Board of Education. The ruling clarified how collateral sources impact the assessment of damages and reinforced the principle that a defendant cannot benefit from payments made to the plaintiff by third parties, thus maintaining the integrity of the plaintiff’s recovery.
Insurance payouts: Insurance payouts are financial compensations provided by an insurance company to policyholders or third parties after a covered loss, injury, or damage occurs. These payments play a crucial role in alleviating the financial burden on individuals affected by accidents or unexpected events, ensuring that they can recover without incurring severe debt. The relationship between insurance payouts and the collateral source rule is significant, as it impacts how damages are calculated in tort cases, particularly concerning the admissibility of such payments during trials.
Liability: Liability refers to the legal responsibility one party has to another for causing harm or injury, which can result in financial compensation or other remedies. It is a fundamental principle in tort law, where the focus is on whether an individual or entity should be held accountable for their actions, particularly when those actions lead to damages or injuries suffered by others. Understanding liability is essential for determining the extent of responsibility and the consequences of negligent or intentional conduct.
Negligence: Negligence is the failure to exercise the level of care that a reasonably prudent person would in similar circumstances, leading to harm or injury to another person. This concept is central to tort law, as it establishes liability for individuals whose careless actions or omissions result in damage or injury to others, connecting to various legal principles and doctrines.
New York's Approach: New York's Approach refers to the unique application of the collateral source rule in tort law within the state of New York. This rule dictates that a plaintiff's compensation for damages should not be reduced by any benefits they receive from other sources, such as insurance or government programs, ensuring that the injured party is fully compensated without penalization for seeking additional support.
Non-economic damages: Non-economic damages are financial compensations awarded to a plaintiff for intangible losses that cannot be easily quantified, such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of companionship. These damages are crucial in personal injury cases as they address the personal and psychological impacts of injuries rather than just the financial costs associated with them.
Subrogation: Subrogation is a legal principle that allows an insurance company or other entity to step into the shoes of the insured party after they have compensated them for a loss, enabling the insurer to pursue recovery from third parties responsible for the damages. This concept plays a crucial role in ensuring that those who are at fault for causing a loss are held accountable, while also allowing the insured to receive the benefits they need without undue delay. Essentially, subrogation helps prevent unjust enrichment by ensuring that the party who caused the harm ultimately bears the financial responsibility.
Third-Party Benefits: Third-party benefits refer to advantages or compensation received by individuals or entities who are not directly involved in a legal agreement or injury claim but may still gain from the outcomes of that claim. This concept is crucial in understanding how collateral sources impact the liability and damages awarded to a plaintiff in tort cases, especially when it comes to insurance coverage or medical benefits that are provided by parties other than the tortfeasor.
California's Approach
See definitionCalifornia's Approach refers to the state's unique interpretation and application of the Collateral Source Rule, which allows plaintiffs to recover damages without deducting amounts received from independent sources like insurance or government benefits. This means that even if a plaintiff has received compensation from another source for their injuries, that amount will not reduce the damages they can claim in court, fostering a more favorable outcome for injured parties.
Term 1 of 14
California's Approach
See definitionCalifornia's Approach refers to the state's unique interpretation and application of the Collateral Source Rule, which allows plaintiffs to recover damages without deducting amounts received from independent sources like insurance or government benefits. This means that even if a plaintiff has received compensation from another source for their injuries, that amount will not reduce the damages they can claim in court, fostering a more favorable outcome for injured parties.
Term 1 of 14
