The Act of Killing is a groundbreaking documentary that explores the 1965-66 Indonesian genocide. It takes an unconventional approach by having perpetrators reenact their crimes, blurring reality and fiction.
The film challenges traditional documentary methods, delving into the psyche of killers and the societal impact of violence. It raises ethical questions about giving voice to perpetrators and potential re-traumatization while sparking crucial discussions on impunity and reconciliation.
Origins of the film
The Act of Killing is a groundbreaking documentary that delves into the 1965-66 Indonesian genocide and its lasting impact on Indonesian society
The film takes an unconventional approach by having the perpetrators of the genocide reenact their crimes, blurring the lines between reality and fiction
Joshua Oppenheimer's inspiration
Top images from around the web for Joshua Oppenheimer's inspiration
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Joshua Oppenheimer's inspiration
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
The Humanity of Perpetrators: Reflections on Joshua Oppenheimer’s “The Act of Killing” (Part I ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Oppenheimer was inspired to make the film after living in Indonesia for several years and learning about the genocide, which is largely unknown outside of the country
He was struck by how the perpetrators of the genocide were still celebrated as heroes in Indonesian society and wanted to explore this through the lens of documentary filmmaking
Oppenheimer's background in experimental filmmaking and his interest in the relationship between fantasy and reality influenced his approach to the film
Collaboration with anonymous co-director
Oppenheimer collaborated with an anonymous Indonesian co-director who had to remain unnamed due to the sensitive nature of the film's subject matter
The co-director played a crucial role in gaining access to the former death squad members and navigating the complex political landscape of Indonesia
The collaboration between Oppenheimer and the co-director allowed for a unique insider-outsider perspective on the genocide and its aftermath
Unconventional documentary approach
The Act of Killing employs an unconventional approach to documentary filmmaking that challenges traditional notions of objectivity and truth
Rather than relying solely on interviews and archival footage, the film actively engages with its subjects and encourages them to reenact their past actions
This approach allows for a deeper exploration of the perpetrators' psyches and the ways in which they justify and make sense of their crimes
Reenactments by perpetrators
The film's central conceit involves having former death squad members, including the main character Anwar Congo, reenact their crimes in the style of Hollywood movies
These reenactments serve as a way for the perpetrators to confront their past actions and to explore the ways in which they have constructed narratives around their involvement in the genocide
The reenactments also serve as a powerful visual metaphor for the way in which violence and trauma can be normalized and even celebrated within a society
Blurring lines between reality and fiction
The Act of Killing deliberately blurs the lines between reality and fiction, challenging the viewer to question the nature of truth and the role of storytelling in shaping our understanding of history
The perpetrators' reenactments often veer into surreal and fantastical territory, reflecting the ways in which they have distorted and mythologized their own actions
The film's use of staged scenes and dramatic lighting further emphasizes the constructed nature of the reenactments and the ways in which the perpetrators are actively shaping the narrative of their past
Metacinematic elements
The Act of Killing incorporates metacinematic elements, drawing attention to the filmmaking process itself and the ways in which the presence of the camera influences the behavior of its subjects
Oppenheimer and his crew are often visible on screen, interacting with the perpetrators and guiding the direction of the reenactments
This self-reflexive approach highlights the inherently subjective nature of documentary filmmaking and the ways in which the filmmaker's presence can shape the reality being captured on film
Portrayal of 1965-66 Indonesian genocide
The Act of Killing sheds light on the largely forgotten 1965-66 Indonesian genocide, in which an estimated 500,000 to 1 million people were killed by the Indonesian military and paramilitary death squads
The genocide targeted suspected communists, leftists, and ethnic Chinese, and was triggered by a failed coup attempt that was blamed on the Indonesian Communist Party
The film explores the ways in which the genocide has been largely erased from Indonesian history and how the perpetrators have been able to maintain positions of power and influence in the decades since
Historical context and background
The 1965-66 Indonesian genocide took place during the Cold War era, when Indonesia was seen as a key battleground between communist and capitalist forces
The genocide was supported by Western powers, including the United States, who saw it as a way to prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia
The genocide resulted in the destruction of the Indonesian left and paved the way for the rise of the authoritarian Suharto regime, which ruled Indonesia for over three decades
Role of paramilitary death squads
The genocide was carried out by a combination of Indonesian military forces and paramilitary death squads, including the Pemuda Pancasila youth organization
These death squads were responsible for carrying out mass killings, torture, and other atrocities against suspected communists and their sympathizers
Many of the death squad members were recruited from the ranks of gangsters and petty criminals, and were given free rein to carry out violence with impunity
Impact on Indonesian society
The 1965-66 genocide had a profound impact on Indonesian society, shaping the country's political and cultural landscape for decades to come
The genocide resulted in the destruction of the Indonesian left and the suppression of political dissent, allowing the military to consolidate its power and establish a authoritarian regime
The trauma of the genocide has been passed down through generations, with many Indonesians still grappling with the legacy of violence and the silence surrounding the events of 1965-66
Main characters and their stories
The Act of Killing focuses on a group of former death squad members, exploring their experiences during the genocide and the ways in which they have come to terms with their past actions
The film's main characters include Anwar Congo, a former death squad leader who becomes the central focus of the film, and Herman Koto, a fellow death squad member who participates in the reenactments
Through the stories of these men, the film offers a disturbing and complex portrait of the psychology of violence and the ways in which perpetrators can rationalize and justify their actions
Anwar Congo's journey
Anwar Congo is the central character of the film, a former death squad leader who claims to have personally killed over 1,000 people during the genocide
Congo is initially boastful and unapologetic about his past actions, even demonstrating his preferred method of killing (strangulation with a wire) with a sense of pride
As the film progresses, however, Congo begins to show signs of remorse and guilt, as the reenactments force him to confront the reality of his crimes in a new way
Congo's journey serves as a powerful example of the ways in which the act of storytelling and reenactment can force perpetrators to confront the truth of their actions and the impact they have had on others
Herman Koto's participation
Herman Koto is another former death squad member who participates in the reenactments alongside Anwar Congo
Koto is a more flamboyant and theatrical character, often dressing in drag and reveling in the attention of the camera
Despite his seemingly lighthearted demeanor, Koto's participation in the reenactments reveals a deeper sense of unease and discomfort with his past actions
Koto's story serves as a counterpoint to Congo's, showing the different ways in which perpetrators can cope with and make sense of their guilt and trauma
Other former death squad members
The film also features interviews with other former death squad members, who offer their own perspectives on the genocide and their involvement in it
These men range from the unrepentant to the deeply troubled, each grappling with their past in their own way
Through their stories, the film offers a complex and nuanced portrait of the psychology of violence and the ways in which ordinary people can be drawn into committing atrocities
Cinematic techniques and style
The Act of Killing employs a range of cinematic techniques and stylistic choices that contribute to its powerful and unsettling impact on the viewer
From surreal and dreamlike sequences to the use of vivid color and lighting, the film creates a visual language that reflects the psychological and emotional landscape of its subjects
The film's style also serves to underscore the ways in which violence and trauma can be normalized and even aestheticized within a society
Surreal and dreamlike sequences
Throughout the film, Oppenheimer incorporates surreal and dreamlike sequences that blur the lines between reality and fantasy
These sequences often take the form of elaborate musical numbers or fantastical reenactments, such as a scene in which Anwar Congo and Herman Koto dress up as cowboys and act out a Western-style shootout
These surreal moments serve to underscore the ways in which the perpetrators have mythologized and romanticized their own actions, creating a sense of cognitive dissonance for the viewer
Use of color and lighting
The Act of Killing makes striking use of color and lighting to create a sense of mood and atmosphere throughout the film
Vivid, saturated colors are often used to create a sense of surreal beauty, even in the midst of disturbing and violent content
The film also employs stark, high-contrast lighting to create a sense of drama and intensity, particularly during the more emotionally charged moments
The use of color and lighting serves to create a sense of unease and disorientation for the viewer, reflecting the psychological state of the film's subjects
Juxtaposition of beauty and horror
One of the most striking aspects of The Act of Killing's visual style is the way in which it juxtaposes beauty and horror, often within the same frame
The film features stunning shots of the Indonesian landscape, with lush jungles and picturesque villages serving as the backdrop for the reenactments of atrocities
This juxtaposition serves to underscore the ways in which violence and trauma can be normalized and even aestheticized within a society, creating a sense of cognitive dissonance for the viewer
The film's use of beauty and horror also reflects the complex and contradictory nature of its subjects, who are capable of both great cruelty and moments of vulnerability and humanity
Ethical considerations and controversies
The Act of Killing raises a number of ethical questions and controversies, particularly around the film's approach to its subject matter and the potential impact on both its subjects and its audience
From the decision to focus on the perpetrators rather than the victims of the genocide to the potential for re-traumatization and the criticisms of the film's unconventional approach, The Act of Killing has sparked intense debate and discussion among filmmakers, scholars, and audiences alike
Giving voice to perpetrators vs victims
One of the most controversial aspects of The Act of Killing is its decision to focus primarily on the perpetrators of the 1965-66 genocide rather than the victims and survivors
Some critics have argued that this approach risks humanizing and even glorifying the perpetrators, while marginalizing the experiences and perspectives of those who suffered at their hands
Others have defended the film's approach, arguing that by forcing the perpetrators to confront the reality of their actions, the film ultimately serves to condemn their crimes and expose the lies and myths they have constructed around themselves
Potential for re-traumatization
Another ethical concern raised by The Act of Killing is the potential for the film to re-traumatize both its subjects and its audience, particularly those with personal connections to the events of the genocide
The film's graphic depictions of violence and its focus on the perpetrators' boastful recounting of their crimes have the potential to trigger painful memories and emotions for those who have experienced trauma related to the genocide
Some have argued that the film's approach is unnecessarily sensationalistic and exploitative, prioritizing shock value over sensitivity and respect for its subjects
Criticisms of the film's approach
The Act of Killing has also faced criticisms for its unconventional and sometimes controversial approach to documentary filmmaking
Some have argued that the film's use of reenactments and staged scenes blurs the line between reality and fiction in a way that is misleading and unethical
Others have criticized the film for its lack of historical context and its failure to provide a more comprehensive account of the events of the genocide and its aftermath
Despite these criticisms, many have defended the film's approach as a powerful and necessary means of confronting the reality of the genocide and exposing the ways in which its perpetrators have been able to escape accountability for their crimes
Impact and reception of the film
Since its release in 2012, The Act of Killing has had a significant impact both within Indonesia and around the world, sparking important conversations about the legacy of the 1965-66 genocide and the ongoing impunity of its perpetrators
The film has been widely acclaimed by critics and audiences alike, earning numerous awards and accolades, including an Academy Award nomination for Best Documentary Feature
Beyond its critical success, the film has also had a profound impact on public discourse and political activism around the genocide and its aftermath
Critical acclaim and awards
The Act of Killing has been widely praised by critics for its bold and innovative approach to documentary filmmaking, as well as its powerful and unsettling exploration of the psychology of violence and impunity
The film has won numerous awards and accolades, including the European Film Award for Best Documentary, the Asia Pacific Screen Award for Best Documentary, and the Guardian Film Award for Best Film
In addition to its Academy Award nomination, the film has also been recognized by numerous other prestigious awards bodies, including the BAFTA Awards, the Independent Spirit Awards, and the Gotham Awards
Raising awareness of Indonesian history
One of the most significant impacts of The Act of Killing has been its role in raising awareness of the 1965-66 Indonesian genocide, both within Indonesia and around the world
Prior to the film's release, the genocide was largely unknown outside of Indonesia, and even within the country, it was a taboo subject that was rarely discussed openly
The Act of Killing has helped to break the silence around the genocide, sparking important conversations and debates about the need for accountability, reconciliation, and historical truth-telling
Sparking discussions on impunity and reconciliation
Beyond raising awareness of the genocide itself, The Act of Killing has also sparked important discussions about the ongoing impunity of the perpetrators and the need for reconciliation and healing in Indonesian society
The film has helped to expose the ways in which the perpetrators of the genocide have been able to maintain positions of power and influence in the decades since, and has called attention to the ongoing suffering and trauma of the survivors and their families
The Act of Killing has also inspired a wider conversation about the role of art and media in confronting difficult and painful histories, and the potential for documentary filmmaking to serve as a tool for social and political change
Legacy and influence on documentary filmmaking
In the years since its release, The Act of Killing has had a significant influence on the field of documentary filmmaking, inspiring a new generation of filmmakers to push the boundaries of the genre and explore unconventional and innovative approaches to storytelling
The film has been widely studied and discussed in academic and artistic circles, and has helped to establish Joshua Oppenheimer as one of the most important and influential documentary filmmakers of his generation
Pushing boundaries of the genre
The Act of Killing has been widely recognized for its bold and innovative approach to documentary filmmaking, which challenges traditional notions of objectivity, truth, and the relationship between filmmaker and subject
By blurring the lines between reality and fiction, and by actively engaging with its subjects in the creation of their own narratives, the film has helped to expand the possibilities of what documentary filmmaking can be and do
The Act of Killing has also challenged the notion that documentaries must always maintain a strict separation between the filmmaker and the subject, instead embracing a more collaborative and participatory approach to storytelling
Inspiring other unconventional documentaries
The success and impact of The Act of Killing has inspired a new wave of unconventional and experimental documentaries that push the boundaries of the genre in new and exciting ways
Films such as The Look of Silence (Oppenheimer's follow-up to The Act of Killing), The Arbor, and The Act of Killing have all been influenced by the film's innovative approach to storytelling and its willingness to take risks and challenge traditional documentary conventions
These films have helped to establish a new canon of experimental and boundary-pushing documentaries that are unafraid to tackle difficult and controversial subjects in bold and unconventional ways
Ongoing relevance and importance of the film
Nearly a decade after its initial release, The Act of Killing remains a vital and important work of documentary filmmaking, with ongoing relevance and significance for audiences around the world
The film's exploration of the psychology of violence, the politics of impunity, and the legacy of historical trauma continues to resonate with viewers, particularly in light of ongoing struggles for justice and accountability in many parts of the world
As a masterful work of cinematic storytelling and a powerful call to action, The Act of Killing is a film that will continue to be studied, discussed, and celebrated for generations to come, serving as a testament to the power of documentary filmmaking to confront difficult truths and inspire social and political change.