Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Conservation strategies represent ecology's applied toolkit—the bridge between understanding how ecosystems work and actually protecting them. You're being tested on more than just knowing what a wildlife corridor is; you need to understand why certain strategies work for specific conservation challenges, how they address threats like habitat fragmentation, genetic bottlenecks, and overexploitation, and when to apply each approach. These concepts connect directly to population dynamics, community ecology, and ecosystem services.
Think of conservation strategies as falling into distinct categories: in-situ vs. ex-situ approaches, species-focused vs. ecosystem-focused management, and top-down policy vs. bottom-up community engagement. The exam will ask you to evaluate which strategy fits which scenario—don't just memorize definitions. Know what problem each strategy solves and what ecological principles make it effective.
In-situ conservation keeps species within their natural habitats, maintaining the ecological relationships and evolutionary pressures that shaped them. This approach preserves not just species but the processes that sustain them.
Compare: Protected areas vs. wildlife corridors—both are in-situ strategies, but protected areas create refugia while corridors address fragmentation between refugia. FRQs often ask you to design a conservation plan that uses both together.
Ex-situ conservation maintains species outside their natural habitats as a backup when in-situ protection isn't sufficient. Think of it as ecological insurance—necessary but never a complete substitute for wild populations.
Compare: Captive breeding vs. seed banks—both preserve genetic material ex-situ, but captive breeding maintains living populations (expensive, space-limited) while seed banks store dormant material (cheaper, massive scale). Seed banks work for plants; captive breeding is necessary for most animals.
These strategies focus on actively managing ecosystems and resources rather than simply protecting them from human activity. The key principle is working with ecological processes rather than against them.
Compare: Ecosystem-based management vs. sustainable resource management—ecosystem-based management considers the whole system first, while sustainable resource management focuses on specific resources humans want to use. The best approaches combine both perspectives.
Conservation ultimately succeeds or fails based on human behavior and institutions. Ecological knowledge means nothing without social structures that translate it into action.
Compare: Top-down legislation vs. community-based conservation—legislation provides enforcement power and broad standards, while community-based approaches generate local buy-in and adapt to local conditions. Most successful conservation programs combine both.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| In-situ conservation | Protected areas, habitat restoration, wildlife corridors |
| Ex-situ conservation | Seed banks, captive breeding, gene banks |
| Addressing fragmentation | Wildlife corridors, habitat restoration |
| Genetic diversity preservation | Captive breeding programs, seed banks, wildlife corridors |
| Ecosystem-level approaches | Ecosystem-based management, sustainable resource management |
| Species-level approaches | Captive breeding, endangered species legislation |
| Human dimensions | Community-based conservation, sustainable resource management |
| Threat mitigation | Invasive species control, protected areas, legislation |
Which two conservation strategies most directly address the problem of reduced gene flow in fragmented landscapes, and how do their mechanisms differ?
A population of 50 individuals exists in a degraded habitat with ongoing poaching. Explain why captive breeding alone would be insufficient and identify which additional strategies would be necessary for long-term recovery.
Compare and contrast ecosystem-based management with single-species conservation approaches. Under what circumstances might you prioritize one over the other?
How do community-based conservation and endangered species legislation represent different theories of what makes conservation effective? What are the strengths and limitations of each?
If an FRQ describes an island ecosystem being invaded by a non-native predator that's driving an endemic bird toward extinction, which combination of strategies would you recommend, and in what sequence? Justify your answer using ecological principles.