💹Business Economics Unit 7 – Game Theory & Strategic Decisions

Game theory analyzes strategic interactions between rational decision-makers. It explores concepts like players, strategies, payoffs, and types of games. Understanding these elements helps predict outcomes in various scenarios, from poker to business competition. Nash equilibrium is a key concept where no player benefits from changing strategy. Game theory applications include market competition, voting behavior, and international relations. Decision trees and extensive form games visually represent sequential decision-making processes in strategic interactions.

Key Concepts in Game Theory

  • Game theory analyzes strategic interactions between rational decision-makers
  • Players are the individuals or groups making decisions in a game
  • Strategies are the complete plans of action that players can choose
  • Payoffs are the outcomes or rewards that players receive based on the strategies chosen
  • Zero-sum games have a fixed total payoff that is divided among the players (Poker)
  • Non-zero-sum games allow for outcomes where all players can gain or lose (Prisoner's Dilemma)
  • Simultaneous games involve players making decisions at the same time without knowledge of others' choices
  • Sequential games involve players making decisions in a specific order, aware of previous choices

Types of Games and Strategies

  • Static games are played simultaneously, where players choose their strategies without knowing the choices of other players
  • Dynamic games are played sequentially, where players take turns making decisions based on the moves of other players
  • Cooperative games allow players to communicate and form binding agreements to coordinate their strategies
  • Non-cooperative games do not allow for enforceable agreements, and players make independent decisions
  • Pure strategies are specific actions that a player chooses to take in a game (Always confess in Prisoner's Dilemma)
  • Mixed strategies involve randomly selecting among available pure strategies based on a probability distribution
  • Dominant strategies are the best choice for a player regardless of the strategies chosen by other players
  • Dominated strategies are those that always lead to worse payoffs compared to other available strategies

Nash Equilibrium and Its Applications

  • Nash equilibrium is a state where each player's strategy is the best response to the strategies of other players
  • In Nash equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy
  • Nash equilibrium can be pure (players choose specific strategies) or mixed (players randomize their strategies)
  • Existence of Nash equilibrium depends on the type of game and the number of players
  • Nash equilibrium helps predict the outcomes of strategic interactions in various fields (Economics, political science, psychology)
  • Applications of Nash equilibrium include market competition, voting behavior, and international relations
  • Nash equilibrium may not always be the most efficient or socially optimal outcome (Prisoner's Dilemma)
  • Refinements of Nash equilibrium, such as subgame perfect equilibrium, address dynamic games and credible threats

Decision Trees and Extensive Form Games

  • Decision trees visually represent the sequential structure of a game
  • Nodes in a decision tree represent decision points for players or chance events
  • Branches in a decision tree represent the available choices or outcomes at each node
  • Payoffs are listed at the terminal nodes of the decision tree
  • Extensive form games are represented using decision trees, capturing the order of moves and information available to players
  • Backward induction is used to solve extensive form games by starting at the terminal nodes and working backwards
  • Subgame perfect equilibrium is determined by finding the Nash equilibrium at each subgame (portion of the game tree)
  • Extensive form games can model situations with imperfect information, where players are unaware of some previous moves

Dominant and Mixed Strategies

  • Dominant strategy equilibrium occurs when each player has a dominant strategy, resulting in a Nash equilibrium
  • Iterated elimination of dominated strategies can be used to simplify games and find dominant strategy equilibria
  • Mixed strategy equilibrium involves players randomizing their strategies based on specific probabilities
  • In a mixed strategy equilibrium, players are indifferent between their available pure strategies
  • Mixed strategies can be used to exploit opponents' tendencies and avoid being predictable
  • Calculating mixed strategy equilibria involves finding probabilities that make players indifferent between strategies
  • Mixed strategies are common in competitive settings (Sports, poker, business competition)
  • Mixed strategy equilibria may not always exist, depending on the structure of the game

Cooperative vs. Non-Cooperative Games

  • Cooperative games allow players to communicate, form coalitions, and make binding agreements
  • In cooperative games, players can negotiate and distribute payoffs among themselves
  • Shapley value is a solution concept for cooperative games that assigns fair payoffs to players based on their marginal contributions
  • Core is another solution concept that ensures no group of players has an incentive to break away from the grand coalition
  • Non-cooperative games do not allow for enforceable agreements, and players make independent decisions
  • In non-cooperative games, players cannot credibly commit to strategies that are not in their individual best interests
  • Nash equilibrium is the primary solution concept for non-cooperative games
  • Many real-world situations involve a combination of cooperative and non-cooperative elements (International treaties, business partnerships)

Game Theory in Business Contexts

  • Game theory helps businesses make strategic decisions in competitive markets
  • Oligopoly models, such as Cournot and Bertrand competition, analyze firm behavior in concentrated industries
  • Price wars can be modeled as a Prisoner's Dilemma, where firms have incentives to undercut each other
  • Product differentiation and market segmentation can be analyzed using game-theoretic frameworks
  • Entry deterrence strategies, such as limit pricing and capacity expansion, can be studied using extensive form games
  • Bargaining and negotiation situations, such as labor-management disputes, can be modeled using cooperative game theory
  • Auctions and bidding behavior can be analyzed using game-theoretic concepts (First-price sealed-bid auction, Vickrey auction)
  • Game theory helps businesses anticipate competitor moves and make strategic investments

Advanced Topics and Real-World Applications

  • Repeated games involve players interacting over multiple rounds, allowing for cooperation and punishment strategies
  • Evolutionary game theory studies the dynamics of strategy adoption in populations over time
  • Signaling games model situations where players have private information and can send costly signals to convey their types
  • Mechanism design involves creating game rules and incentives to achieve desired outcomes (Auctions, voting systems)
  • Behavioral game theory incorporates insights from psychology and relaxes assumptions of perfect rationality
  • Experimental game theory tests theoretical predictions using controlled laboratory experiments
  • Game theory has applications in various fields beyond economics (Biology, computer science, political science)
  • Real-world applications include spectrum auctions, kidney exchange programs, and climate change negotiations


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.