🧑🏻💼United States Law and Legal Analysis Unit 8 – Administrative Law & Regulatory Agencies
Administrative law governs the creation and operation of executive branch agencies. These agencies, created by Congress, engage in rulemaking and adjudication, exercising discretion while subject to procedural requirements and judicial oversight to protect individual rights and ensure proper authority.
The development of administrative agencies spans from the Interstate Commerce Commission in 1887 to the New Deal era's expansion and beyond. The Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 established uniform procedures for agency actions, while recent decades have seen debates over agencies' roles in a changing landscape.
Administrative law governs the creation and operation of administrative agencies, which are part of the executive branch of government
Agencies are created by Congress through enabling statutes that define their powers, duties, and organizational structure
Agencies engage in rulemaking, issuing regulations that have the force of law and fill in the details of broad statutory mandates
Adjudication involves agencies making case-by-case decisions to resolve disputes or enforce regulations (Federal Trade Commission deciding if an ad is deceptive)
Agencies exercise discretion in carrying out their statutory responsibilities, but are subject to procedural requirements and judicial oversight
Due process requires agencies to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before taking actions that affect individual rights or property interests
Judicial review ensures that agencies act within their statutory authority, follow required procedures, and make decisions supported by substantial evidence
Historical Development of Administrative Agencies
The first federal administrative agency, the Interstate Commerce Commission, was created in 1887 to regulate railroads
The New Deal era of the 1930s saw a rapid expansion of federal agencies to address economic and social problems (Securities and Exchange Commission, National Labor Relations Board)
World War II and the post-war period led to the creation of more agencies to manage wartime production and implement new social programs (Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration)
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of 1946 established uniform procedures for agency rulemaking and adjudication and codified standards for judicial review
The 1960s and 1970s witnessed a proliferation of agencies focused on consumer protection, civil rights, and environmental regulation
The 1980s and 1990s saw efforts to deregulate certain industries (airlines, telecommunications) and streamline agency procedures
Recent decades have featured debates over the proper role and scope of administrative agencies in a changing economy and political landscape
Types and Structure of Regulatory Agencies
Executive agencies are under the direct control of the President and are typically headed by a single administrator appointed by the President with Senate confirmation (Department of Labor, Environmental Protection Agency)
Independent agencies are more insulated from presidential control, often headed by multi-member commissions with staggered terms and bipartisan representation (Federal Communications Commission, Consumer Product Safety Commission)
Some agencies exercise broad regulatory authority over a sector of the economy (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), while others have a narrower focus (Mine Safety and Health Administration)
Agencies are structured with various offices and divisions that handle different functions such as rulemaking, enforcement, research, and public outreach
Many agencies have an internal separation of functions, with different personnel responsible for investigation, prosecution, and adjudication to ensure fairness and impartiality
Some agencies are funded by congressional appropriations, while others are partially or fully funded by fees and assessments on regulated entities
Rulemaking Process and Procedures
Informal rulemaking, also known as notice-and-comment rulemaking, is the most common procedure for issuing regulations
Agencies must publish a proposed rule in the Federal Register, allow time for public comment, and respond to significant comments before issuing a final rule
The APA requires agencies to provide a concise general statement of a rule's basis and purpose
Formal rulemaking, which is less common, requires a trial-type hearing before an administrative law judge and a decision based on the hearing record
Agencies must consider the economic impact of proposed rules and conduct cost-benefit analysis for significant rules
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the White House Office of Management and Budget reviews significant rules before publication
Negotiated rulemaking involves bringing together representatives of interested parties to reach consensus on a proposed rule before the formal rulemaking process begins
Direct final rulemaking allows agencies to issue non-controversial rules without prior notice and comment, but the rule is withdrawn if adverse comments are received
Enforcement and Adjudication Powers
Agencies have the power to investigate potential violations of statutes and regulations through inspections, subpoenas, and other means
Administrative law judges (ALJs) preside over agency adjudicatory hearings, which are similar to court trials but less formal
ALJs are agency employees but have a degree of independence to ensure impartiality
Agencies can appeal ALJ decisions to the agency head or a review board before they become final
Agencies can impose civil penalties, revoke licenses or permits, and issue cease-and-desist orders to enforce compliance with regulations
Criminal enforcement of agency statutes is typically handled by the Department of Justice, but some agencies have authority to bring criminal charges directly
Agencies can use a variety of alternative dispute resolution methods (negotiation, mediation, arbitration) to resolve enforcement actions and other disputes
Judicial Review of Agency Actions
The APA provides for judicial review of final agency actions, findings, and conclusions
Review is typically conducted by federal district courts, with appeals to the circuit courts of appeals and potential review by the Supreme Court
The scope of review depends on the type of agency action and the applicable statutory language
Questions of law are reviewed de novo, with the court deciding the issue independently
Questions of fact are reviewed under the substantial evidence test (for formal proceedings) or the arbitrary and capricious standard (for informal proceedings)
Courts generally defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute it administers (Chevron deference) or its own ambiguous regulations (Auer deference)
Judicial review is not available when statutes preclude review or the action is committed to agency discretion by law
Standing to seek judicial review requires a concrete and particularized injury caused by the challenged action and redressable by a favorable court decision
Constitutional Limits on Agency Authority
The nondelegation doctrine, based on the separation of powers, holds that Congress cannot delegate its legislative power to agencies without providing an intelligible principle to guide agency discretion
The Supreme Court has not invalidated a statute on nondelegation grounds since the 1930s, but the doctrine remains a subject of debate
The Appointments Clause requires that principal officers of the United States be appointed by the President with Senate confirmation, while inferior officers can be appointed by the President alone, courts, or heads of departments
The Take Care Clause requires the President to faithfully execute the laws, providing a basis for presidential oversight of agencies
Procedural due process requires agencies to provide notice and an opportunity to be heard before depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property
Substantive due process prohibits arbitrary and capricious agency action that infringes on fundamental rights
The First Amendment limits agency restrictions on speech and other expressive activities
Current Issues and Debates in Administrative Law
The role of cost-benefit analysis in regulatory decision-making and the appropriate methods for quantifying costs and benefits
The use of guidance documents and other non-binding agency statements to influence regulated entities without going through the rulemaking process
The impact of presidential control over agency decision-making through executive orders, centralized review, and other means
The effect of agency capture, where regulated industries exert undue influence over the agencies that regulate them
The application of Chevron deference and whether courts should be more skeptical of agency statutory interpretations
The use of science and technical expertise in agency decision-making and the role of public participation and transparency
The growth of the administrative state and whether Congress has delegated too much power to unelected agency officials
The potential for agencies to take actions that exceed their statutory authority or infringe on individual rights and the effectiveness of judicial review in checking agency overreach