Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Unit 18 – Design Factors for Energy Harvesters

Piezoelectric energy harvesting converts mechanical stress into electrical energy using materials like PZT and PVDF. Key components include a transducer, power conditioning circuit, and energy storage device. Design factors such as resonant frequency, coupling coefficient, and material properties significantly impact harvester performance. Structural configurations like cantilever beams and circular diaphragms are optimized for specific applications. Environmental factors, including temperature and humidity, affect harvester efficiency. Modeling techniques and optimization strategies help maximize energy output for practical applications in wireless sensors, wearables, and industrial monitoring.

Fundamentals of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting

  • Piezoelectric effect converts mechanical stress or strain into electrical energy and vice versa
  • Piezoelectric materials exhibit direct piezoelectric effect (generating voltage under applied stress) and converse piezoelectric effect (mechanical deformation under applied electric field)
  • Common piezoelectric materials include lead zirconate titanate (PZT), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and aluminum nitride (AlN)
  • Piezoelectric energy harvesting systems typically consist of a piezoelectric transducer, power conditioning circuit, and energy storage device
    • Transducer converts mechanical energy into electrical energy
    • Power conditioning circuit rectifies and regulates the generated voltage
    • Energy storage device (supercapacitor or battery) stores the harvested energy for later use
  • Coupling coefficient (k2k^2) quantifies the efficiency of energy conversion between mechanical and electrical domains
  • Piezoelectric voltage constant (gijg_{ij}) relates the open-circuit electric field to the applied mechanical stress
  • Piezoelectric charge constant (dijd_{ij}) relates the short-circuit charge density to the applied mechanical stress

Key Design Parameters and Considerations

  • Resonant frequency of the piezoelectric harvester should match the dominant frequency of the ambient vibration source for maximum energy output
  • Mechanical quality factor (QmQ_m) represents the sharpness of the resonance peak and affects the bandwidth of the harvester
    • High QmQ_m results in narrow bandwidth but higher peak power output
    • Low QmQ_m provides wider bandwidth but lower peak power output
  • Electromechanical coupling coefficient (k2k^2) should be maximized for efficient energy conversion
  • Piezoelectric material properties (piezoelectric constants, dielectric constant, and mechanical properties) influence the harvester's performance
  • Impedance matching between the piezoelectric transducer and the load circuit is crucial for maximum power transfer
  • Mechanical damping (structural and air damping) dissipates energy and reduces the harvester's efficiency
  • Strain distribution across the piezoelectric material affects the energy generation capacity
  • Fatigue life and durability of the piezoelectric material and the harvester structure should be considered for long-term operation

Materials Selection for Energy Harvesters

  • Piezoelectric ceramics (PZT, BaTiO3) offer high piezoelectric coefficients and electromechanical coupling but are brittle and have high acoustic impedance
  • Piezoelectric polymers (PVDF) are flexible, lightweight, and have low acoustic impedance but exhibit lower piezoelectric coefficients compared to ceramics
  • Single crystals (PMN-PT, PZN-PT) have exceptionally high piezoelectric properties but are expensive and challenging to fabricate
  • Piezoelectric composites combine the advantages of ceramics and polymers, offering high piezoelectric properties and flexibility
    • 1-3 composites consist of piezoelectric ceramic rods embedded in a polymer matrix
    • 0-3 composites have piezoelectric ceramic particles dispersed in a polymer matrix
  • Piezoelectric thin films (PZT, AlN) enable MEMS-scale energy harvesters and can be integrated with silicon-based electronics
  • Non-toxic and lead-free piezoelectric materials (KNN, BNT-BT) are being developed to address environmental concerns
  • Material selection should consider the application requirements, such as frequency range, power density, and environmental conditions

Structural Configurations and Geometries

  • Cantilever beam configuration is widely used due to its simplicity, low resonant frequency, and high strain distribution
    • Unimorph cantilever has a single piezoelectric layer bonded to a passive substrate
    • Bimorph cantilever has two piezoelectric layers with opposite polarization directions
  • Bridge configuration offers higher power output and wider frequency bandwidth compared to cantilever beams
  • Circular diaphragm configuration is suitable for low-frequency and high-force applications (pressure sensors)
  • Cymbal and stack configurations amplify the stress applied to the piezoelectric material, increasing the power output
    • Cymbal consists of a piezoelectric disc sandwiched between two metal end caps
    • Stack has multiple piezoelectric layers connected mechanically in series and electrically in parallel
  • Interdigitated electrode (IDE) configuration enables in-plane strain harvesting and reduces the required thickness of the piezoelectric layer
  • Geometry optimization (shape, dimensions, and aspect ratio) can enhance the energy harvesting performance
  • Finite element analysis (FEA) is used to model and optimize the structural configuration and geometry

Environmental and Operational Factors

  • Temperature variations affect the piezoelectric properties and the resonant frequency of the harvester
    • Piezoelectric materials have a Curie temperature above which they lose their piezoelectric properties
    • Thermal expansion mismatch between layers can cause stress and degrade performance
  • Humidity and moisture can lead to corrosion, electrical shorting, and degradation of the piezoelectric material
  • Mechanical vibrations from the environment (machinery, human motion) are the primary energy source for piezoelectric harvesters
    • Vibration characteristics (frequency, amplitude, and spectrum) determine the harvester's design and performance
  • Mechanical loads (static and dynamic) can cause stress and strain in the piezoelectric material, affecting its performance and lifespan
  • Electromagnetic interference (EMI) can couple with the piezoelectric transducer and generate noise in the output signal
  • Encapsulation and packaging protect the harvester from environmental factors and ensure reliable operation
    • Hermetic sealing prevents moisture and contaminants from entering the package
    • Mechanical isolation minimizes the influence of external vibrations and shocks

Modeling and Simulation Techniques

  • Lumped parameter models represent the piezoelectric harvester as a mass-spring-damper system with electrical coupling
    • Single degree of freedom (SDOF) model is used for simple cantilever beam configurations
    • Multiple degree of freedom (MDOF) models capture the behavior of more complex structures
  • Distributed parameter models consider the spatial distribution of mass, stiffness, and piezoelectric properties along the harvester structure
    • Euler-Bernoulli beam theory is used for slender beams with small deflections
    • Timoshenko beam theory accounts for shear deformation and rotary inertia, suitable for thick beams
  • Finite element analysis (FEA) discretizes the harvester structure into small elements and solves the coupled electromechanical equations
    • Commercial FEA software (ANSYS, COMSOL) provides piezoelectric modeling capabilities
    • FEA enables the modeling of complex geometries, material properties, and boundary conditions
  • Equivalent circuit models represent the piezoelectric harvester as an electrical circuit with lumped components
    • Piezoelectric material is modeled as a current source in parallel with a capacitor
    • Mechanical domain is represented by inductors, capacitors, and resistors
  • Coupled field analysis considers the interaction between mechanical, electrical, and thermal domains in the piezoelectric harvester
  • Experimental validation is essential to verify the accuracy of the modeling and simulation results

Optimization Strategies for Energy Output

  • Resonance tuning techniques adjust the harvester's resonant frequency to match the dominant frequency of the vibration source
    • Mechanical tuning methods include changing the mass, stiffness, or dimensions of the harvester structure
    • Electrical tuning methods use capacitive or inductive loads to alter the electrical resonance
  • Impedance matching ensures maximum power transfer from the piezoelectric transducer to the load circuit
    • Resistive impedance matching uses a load resistance equal to the internal impedance of the piezoelectric transducer
    • Reactive impedance matching employs inductors and capacitors to cancel the reactive component of the transducer's impedance
  • Nonlinear energy harvesting techniques exploit the nonlinear behavior of the piezoelectric material or the harvester structure
    • Bistable energy harvesters have two stable equilibrium positions and can exhibit broadband frequency response
    • Monostable harvesters with nonlinear stiffness can improve the bandwidth and power output
  • Frequency up-conversion mechanisms convert low-frequency vibrations to high-frequency oscillations suitable for the piezoelectric transducer
    • Impact-driven harvesters use a low-frequency oscillating mass to strike the piezoelectric transducer
    • Plucking-based harvesters employ a plectrum to intermittently deflect the piezoelectric beam
  • Synchronized switch harvesting on inductor (SSHI) technique improves the power extraction by inverting the voltage across the piezoelectric transducer at zero crossing points
  • Optimization algorithms (genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization) can be used to find the optimal design parameters for maximum energy output

Practical Applications and Case Studies

  • Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) powered by piezoelectric energy harvesters for structural health monitoring, environmental monitoring, and industrial automation
    • Bridge monitoring system using piezoelectric harvesters embedded in the bridge structure
    • Tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS) with piezoelectric harvesters powered by tire vibrations
  • Wearable devices and implantable medical devices utilizing human motion and biological vibrations
    • Shoe-mounted piezoelectric harvesters for powering wearable electronics
    • Pacemakers and hearing aids with piezoelectric energy harvesting from heart beats and ear canal deformations
  • Industrial machinery and equipment monitoring using piezoelectric harvesters attached to rotating shafts, bearings, and gearboxes
  • Aerospace applications, such as aircraft structural monitoring and satellite power systems
    • Piezoelectric harvesters integrated into aircraft wings for structural health monitoring
    • Micro-satellites with piezoelectric energy harvesting from vibrations during launch and deployment
  • Automotive applications, including battery-less wireless sensors and tire pressure monitoring systems
  • Smart infrastructure and building automation systems with piezoelectric harvesters embedded in floors, walls, and windows
    • Piezoelectric floor tiles harvesting energy from foot traffic in high-density public areas
    • Window-mounted piezoelectric harvesters utilizing wind-induced vibrations for powering wireless sensors
  • Case studies demonstrating the successful implementation of piezoelectric energy harvesting in real-world applications
    • Pavegen's piezoelectric floor tiles used in high-traffic areas like shopping malls and train stations
    • Perpetuum's wireless sensor system for rail infrastructure monitoring, powered by piezoelectric harvesters on train axles


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.