10.7 Order theory in distributed computing

Order theory in distributed computing helps us understand how events relate in complex systems. It's crucial for maintaining consistency and reasoning about causality across multiple processes or nodes.

Key concepts include partial orders, happened-before relations, and logical clocks. These tools allow us to track event ordering, detect concurrency, and ensure causal consistency in distributed systems.

Partial orders in distributed systems

• Partial orders form the foundation for understanding event relationships in distributed systems
• These orders help maintain consistency and coherence across multiple processes or nodes
• Crucial for reasoning about causality and concurrency in distributed computations

Happened-before relation

Top images from around the web for Happened-before relation

• 

  Drawing UML Diagrams with UMLGraph View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Casual loop diagram - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Distributed computing - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Drawing UML Diagrams with UMLGraph View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Casual loop diagram - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Happened-before relation

• 

  Drawing UML Diagrams with UMLGraph View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Casual loop diagram - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Distributed computing - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Drawing UML Diagrams with UMLGraph View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Casual loop diagram - Simulace.info View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Defines a partial order of events in a distributed system
• Denoted by the symbol "→" (e.g., a → b means "a happened before b")
• Three rules define the happened-before relation:
  • If a and b are events in the same process, and a occurs before b, then a → b
  • If a is the sending of a message and b is the receipt of that message, then a → b
  • If a → b and b → c, then a → c (transitivity)
• Helps capture causal relationships between events across different processes

Causal order

• Extends the happened-before relation to maintain causal consistency
• Ensures that if event A causally precedes event B, all processes observe A before B
• Implemented using logical clocks or vector clocks
• Crucial for maintaining the integrity of distributed computations and data consistency
• Allows for concurrent events that are not causally related

Lamport timestamps

• Scalar clock mechanism proposed by Leslie Lamport
• Assigns a unique timestamp to each event in a distributed system
• Rules for updating Lamport timestamps:
  • Increment the local clock before each event
  • When sending a message, include the current timestamp
  • Upon receiving a message, set the local clock to max(local_clock, received_timestamp) + 1
• Provides a total ordering of events, but does not capture all causal relationships
• Useful for debugging and ordering events in distributed systems

Logical clocks

• Abstract mechanisms for tracking the order of events in distributed systems
• Help establish a partial or total order of events across multiple processes
• Essential for maintaining consistency and understanding causality in distributed computations

Vector clocks

• Extend Lamport timestamps to capture causal relationships more accurately
• Each process maintains a vector of logical clocks, one for each process in the system
• Vector clock operations:
  • Increment local component before each event
  • When sending a message, include the entire vector clock
  • Upon receiving a message, update each component to max(local_component, received_component)
• Allow for detecting concurrent events and partial ordering of events
• Enable reasoning about causality in distributed systems more precisely than Lamport timestamps

Matrix clocks

• Further extension of vector clocks to capture more detailed information about event ordering
• Each process maintains a matrix of logical clocks, representing knowledge about other processes' clocks
• Matrix clock operations:
  • Update local row similar to vector clocks
  • When sending a message, include the entire matrix
  • Upon receiving a message, update each element to max(local_element, received_element)
• Provide more comprehensive information about the global state of the system
• Useful for applications requiring a more detailed understanding of event relationships

Version vectors

• Variation of vector clocks used primarily in distributed data stores
• Track versions of data items across multiple replicas
• Version vector operations:
  • Increment local component when modifying a data item
  • Compare version vectors to detect conflicts or determine causality
  • Merge version vectors during synchronization or conflict resolution
• Enable detection of concurrent updates and help in conflict resolution
• Widely used in distributed databases and file systems (Dynamo, Riak)

Consistent global states

• Represent a snapshot of the entire distributed system at a given point in time
• Critical for debugging, checkpointing, and reasoning about distributed computations
• Ensure that the recorded state is consistent across all processes and communication channels

Snapshots in distributed systems

• Capture the state of processes and communication channels at a specific moment
• Challenges in obtaining consistent snapshots:
  • Processes run asynchronously and at different speeds
  • Messages may be in transit during the snapshot process
  • No global clock to coordinate the snapshot
• Used for various purposes:
  • Detecting stable properties (deadlock, termination)
  • Creating checkpoints for fault tolerance
  • Debugging distributed applications

Cut consistency

• Defines a consistent cut as a subset of events in a distributed computation
• Properties of a consistent cut:
  • If an event is included in the cut, all causally preceding events are also included
  • Ensures that the cut represents a possible global state of the system
• Types of cuts:
  • Consistent cut: respects causal relationships
  • Inconsistent cut: violates causal relationships
• Used to reason about the correctness of distributed algorithms and protocols

Chandy-Lamport algorithm

• Distributed algorithm for capturing consistent global states
• Key steps of the algorithm:
  1. Initiator process records its state and sends marker messages on all outgoing channels
  2. Upon receiving a marker, a process records its state if not already done
  3. Processes record incoming messages on channels until receiving markers
• Ensures that the recorded global state is consistent
• Does not require freezing the entire system during the snapshot process
• Widely used as a foundation for more advanced snapshot algorithms

Distributed mutual exclusion

• Ensures that only one process can access a shared resource or execute a critical section at a time
• Crucial for maintaining consistency and preventing race conditions in distributed systems
• Challenges include achieving fairness, efficiency, and fault tolerance

Token-based algorithms

• Use a unique token to grant exclusive access to the critical section
• Token circulation methods:
  • Ring-based: token circulates in a predefined order
  • Tree-based: token moves up and down a logical tree structure
• Advantages:
  • Low message complexity in steady state
  • Inherent fairness due to token circulation
• Drawbacks:
  • Vulnerable to token loss
  • May have high latency for acquiring the token

Permission-based algorithms

• Processes request and grant permissions to enter the critical section
• Popular algorithms:
  • Ricart-Agrawala algorithm: uses logical clocks to order requests
  • Maekawa's algorithm: uses voting sets to reduce message complexity
• Characteristics:
  • Typically require all-to-all communication
  • Can achieve better response times than token-based algorithms
  • May suffer from high message overhead in large systems

Quorum-based algorithms

• Require processes to obtain permissions from a subset (quorum) of processes
• Quorum selection strategies:
  • Majority quorum: more than half of the processes
  • Grid quorum: arranges processes in a logical grid
• Properties:
  • Provide better fault tolerance than other approaches
  • Can balance load across the system
  • May have variable response times depending on quorum availability

Distributed consensus

• Problem of reaching agreement among multiple processes on a single value or decision
• Fundamental to many distributed computing tasks (leader election, atomic broadcast)
• Challenging in the presence of failures and network partitions

Byzantine fault tolerance

• Addresses the problem of reaching consensus in the presence of malicious or arbitrarily faulty processes
• Key concepts:
  • Byzantine generals problem: metaphor for the consensus problem with Byzantine faults
  • Byzantine agreement: all correct processes agree on a value despite Byzantine failures
• Algorithms:
  • Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT): efficient algorithm for state machine replication
  • Honey Badger BFT: asynchronous Byzantine consensus protocol
• Applications in blockchain systems and mission-critical distributed systems

Paxos algorithm

• Classic consensus algorithm proposed by Leslie Lamport
• Roles in the Paxos algorithm:
  • Proposers: suggest values
  • Acceptors: vote on proposed values
  • Learners: learn the agreed-upon value
• Key phases:
  1. Prepare phase: proposer seeks promises from acceptors
  2. Accept phase: proposer asks acceptors to accept a value
• Guarantees safety (agreement) but not liveness (progress) in asynchronous systems
• Variants:
  • Multi-Paxos: optimized for multiple consensus instances
  • Fast Paxos: reduces latency in certain scenarios

Raft consensus protocol

• Designed as a more understandable alternative to Paxos
• Key components:
  • Leader election: select a leader to coordinate consensus
  • Log replication: replicate log entries across all nodes
  • Safety: ensure consistency even during network partitions
• Features:
  • Strong leader: all client requests go through the leader
  • Leader election using randomized timeouts
  • Membership changes: allows for dynamic cluster reconfiguration
• Widely adopted in practical systems (etcd, Consul)

Eventual consistency

• Weak consistency model that guarantees all replicas will eventually converge to the same state
• Trades off strong consistency for improved availability and partition tolerance
• Suitable for systems where temporary inconsistencies can be tolerated

Conflict resolution strategies

• Techniques for resolving conflicting updates in eventually consistent systems
• Common strategies:
  • Last-writer-wins (LWW): use timestamps to determine the "winning" update
  • Vector clocks: use version vectors to detect and resolve conflicts
  • Semantic resolution: application-specific logic to merge conflicting updates
• Considerations:
  • Performance impact of conflict detection and resolution
  • Complexity of implementing correct resolution logic
  • User experience when presenting conflicts or merged results

Convergent replicated data types (CRDTs)

• Data structures designed to achieve eventual consistency without coordination
• Types of CRDTs:
  • State-based CRDTs (CvRDTs): merge states to achieve convergence
  • Operation-based CRDTs (CmRDTs): commutative operations ensure convergence
• Common CRDT examples:
  • G-Counter: grow-only counter
  • OR-Set: observed-remove set
  • LWW-Element-Set: last-writer-wins set
• Benefits:
  • Automatic conflict resolution
  • Strong eventual consistency guarantees
  • Reduced coordination overhead in distributed systems

Gossip protocols

• Decentralized communication protocols for information dissemination in distributed systems
• Key characteristics:
  • Nodes periodically exchange information with randomly selected peers
  • Information spreads exponentially throughout the network
  • Robust to node failures and network partitions
• Applications:
  • Failure detection in distributed systems
  • Maintaining membership information in large-scale systems
  • Propagating updates in eventually consistent databases
• Variants:
  • Push gossip: nodes actively send updates to peers
  • Pull gossip: nodes request updates from peers
  • Push-pull gossip: combination of push and pull strategies

Causality in distributed systems

• Fundamental concept for understanding and reasoning about event relationships
• Crucial for maintaining consistency and correctness in distributed computations
• Challenges arise due to the lack of global time and asynchronous nature of distributed systems

Causal broadcast

• Message dissemination protocol that preserves causal relationships between messages
• Properties of causal broadcast:
  • Causal delivery: messages are delivered respecting causal order
  • Reliability: all correct processes deliver all messages
  • Validity: if a correct process broadcasts a message, it eventually delivers it
• Implementation techniques:
  • Vector clocks: use vector timestamps to track causal dependencies
  • Causal histories: maintain sets of causally preceding events
• Applications:
  • Maintaining consistency in replicated databases
  • Ensuring correct order of operations in distributed systems

Causal memory

• Distributed shared memory model that preserves causal relationships between read and write operations
• Key properties:
  • Causal consistency: reads reflect all causally preceding writes
  • Session guarantees: provides stronger consistency within a single client session
• Implementation challenges:
  • Tracking causal dependencies across multiple replicas
  • Balancing consistency guarantees with performance and scalability
• Use cases:
  • Geo-replicated data stores (COPS, Eiger)
  • Collaborative editing systems

Potential causality

• Extends the concept of causality to account for possible causal relationships
• Key concepts:
  • Potential cause: an event that could have influenced another event
  • Causal uncertainty: inability to determine definite causal relationships
• Techniques for reasoning about potential causality:
  • Interval clocks: represent time as intervals to capture uncertainty
  • Plausible clocks: probabilistic approach to causal ordering
• Applications:
  • Debugging distributed systems with imperfect clock synchronization
  • Analyzing causality in large-scale distributed traces

Distributed transactions

• Ensure atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability (ACID) properties across multiple nodes
• Critical for maintaining data integrity in distributed databases and systems
• Challenges include coordinating multiple participants and handling failures

Two-phase commit protocol (2PC)

• Widely used atomic commitment protocol for distributed transactions
• Phases of 2PC:
  1. Prepare phase: coordinator asks participants to prepare for commit
  2. Commit/Abort phase: coordinator decides and informs participants of the final decision
• Properties:
  • Ensures atomicity: all participants either commit or abort
  • Blocking protocol: participants may block waiting for coordinator's decision
• Drawbacks:
  • Single point of failure (coordinator)
  • Performance overhead due to multiple round trips

Three-phase commit protocol (3PC)

• Extension of 2PC designed to reduce blocking and improve fault tolerance
• Phases of 3PC:
  1. CanCommit phase: coordinator checks if participants can commit
  2. PreCommit phase: coordinator instructs participants to prepare for commit
  3. DoCommit phase: coordinator instructs participants to commit
• Advantages over 2PC:
  • Non-blocking in certain failure scenarios
  • Allows for easier recovery in case of coordinator failure
• Drawbacks:
  • Higher message complexity than 2PC
  • Still vulnerable to certain network partition scenarios

Saga pattern

• Alternative to traditional distributed transactions for long-running business processes
• Key concepts:
  • Saga: sequence of local transactions, each with a compensating transaction
  • Compensating transaction: reverses the effects of a completed transaction
• Implementation approaches:
  • Choreography: each service publishes events to trigger the next step
  • Orchestration: central coordinator manages the saga execution
• Benefits:
  • Improved scalability and performance compared to distributed transactions
  • Better fault isolation and recovery mechanisms
• Challenges:
  • Increased complexity in handling compensating transactions
  • Eventual consistency model may not be suitable for all use cases

Ordering in peer-to-peer systems

• Crucial for maintaining consistency and efficiency in decentralized networks
• Challenges include scalability, fault tolerance, and load balancing
• Key to enabling efficient data lookup and routing in large-scale distributed systems

Distributed hash tables (DHTs)

• Decentralized key-value storage systems for peer-to-peer networks
• Key features:
  • Distributed storage and retrieval of key-value pairs
  • Scalable lookup operations (typically O(log N) complexity)
  • Self-organizing and fault-tolerant
• Common DHT implementations:
  • Chord: uses consistent hashing on a ring topology
  • Kademlia: uses XOR metric for routing
  • CAN (Content Addressable Network): uses multi-dimensional coordinate space
• Applications:
  • Peer-to-peer file sharing systems
  • Decentralized storage systems
  • Service discovery in large-scale networks

Chord protocol

• Scalable peer-to-peer lookup protocol based on consistent hashing
• Key components:
  • Identifier space: circular space of 2^m identifiers
  • Finger table: routing table with logarithmic number of entries
  • Successor and predecessor pointers: maintain ring structure
• Operations:
  • Node join: new node finds its position and updates relevant nodes
  • Key lookup: forward request to closest preceding node in finger table
  • Stabilization: periodic maintenance to handle node failures and joins
• Properties:
  • Efficient lookups: O(log N) hops on average
  • Self-stabilizing: recovers from failures and maintains correctness
  • Load balancing: uniform distribution of keys across nodes

Pastry overlay network

• Scalable and self-organizing peer-to-peer substrate
• Key features:
  • Prefix-based routing: nodes and keys share a common identifier space
  • Leaf set: maintains connections to numerically closest nodes
  • Routing table: organized by prefix matching
• Routing algorithm:
  • Forward to node sharing longest matching prefix
  • Use leaf set for numerically close destinations
  • Fallback to numeric proximity if no match found
• Properties:
  • Locality-aware routing: considers network proximity in routing decisions
  • Fault tolerance: multiple routing paths for resilience
  • Supports various applications (PAST, Scribe)

Time synchronization

• Essential for coordinating actions and maintaining consistency in distributed systems
• Challenges include network delays, clock drift, and varying processing times
• Critical for applications requiring precise timing or event ordering

Network Time Protocol (NTP)

• Widely used protocol for synchronizing computer clocks over packet-switched networks
• Hierarchical structure:
  • Stratum 0: high-precision time sources (atomic clocks, GPS)
  • Stratum 1-15: servers and clients at increasing levels of separation from primary sources
• Key features:
  • Uses UDP for time synchronization messages
  • Employs sophisticated algorithms to estimate and compensate for network delays
  • Supports authentication for secure time synchronization
• Accuracy:
  • Typical accuracy of 1-50 ms over the public internet
  • Sub-millisecond accuracy possible on local networks

Cristian's algorithm

• Simple time synchronization algorithm for client-server systems
• Steps:
  1. Client requests time from server
  2. Server responds with its current time
  3. Client adjusts its clock based on received time and estimated round-trip delay
• Round-trip delay estimation:
  • RTT = (T1 - T0) - (T3 - T2)
  • Where T0: client send time, T1: client receive time, T2: server receive time, T3: server send time
• Advantages:
  • Simple to implement and understand
  • Works well for single server synchronization
• Limitations:
  • Assumes symmetric network delays
  • Vulnerable to server failures

Berkeley algorithm

• Designed for synchronizing a group of computers without relying on an external time source
• Key steps:
  1. Coordinator polls all machines for their time
  2. Coordinator calculates average time, excluding outliers
  3. Coordinator sends time adjustments to each machine
• Features:
  • Fault-tolerant: can handle failures of non-coordinator nodes
  • Adaptive: adjusts to changing network conditions
  • Suitable for closed networks without external time sources
• Limitations:
  • Single point of failure (coordinator)
  • May not achieve high accuracy in networks with varying delays