Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Unit conversion isn't just arithmetic busywork—it's the foundation of every calculation you'll do in physics, chemistry, and engineering. When you're solving problems involving motion, energy, or thermodynamics, you'll constantly need to translate between measurement systems. The AP exam tests whether you can set up conversions correctly, track units through multi-step problems, and recognize when dimensional analysis reveals an error.
The underlying principle here is dimensional analysis: the idea that units behave like algebraic quantities that must balance on both sides of an equation. You're being tested on your ability to use conversion factors as fractions equal to 1, chain multiple conversions together, and catch mistakes by checking whether your final units make sense. Don't just memorize numbers—understand why each conversion factor works and when you'd need it.
The metric system is built on powers of 10, making conversions straightforward once you understand the prefix hierarchy. Each prefix represents a specific power of 10 relative to the base unit, so converting between them is really just moving decimal places.
These conversions bridge the metric (SI) system and the imperial/US customary system. The key is knowing a few anchor values precisely and deriving others from them.
Compare: Length vs. Volume conversions—both use the same base relationships, but volume requires cubing the conversion factor. If an FRQ gives you a density in g/cm³ and asks for kg/m³, you need to convert mass and volume units separately.
Derived units combine base units, so conversions require handling multiple dimensions simultaneously. Speed, force, energy, and pressure all involve ratios or products of fundamental quantities.
Compare: Force vs. Pressure—both involve newtons, but pressure divides by area. A 100 N force creates vastly different pressures depending on whether it's applied over 1 m² or 1 cm². FRQs often test whether you can distinguish these concepts.
These conversions are essential for thermodynamics problems. Energy conversions involve constants that bridge macroscopic and microscopic scales, while temperature conversions require understanding different zero points.
Compare: Energy conversions vs. Temperature conversions—energy conversions are simple multiplication (1 J = 0.239 cal), but temperature conversions require both scaling and shifting. This distinction matters when you're calculating changes in temperature (only scaling applies) versus absolute temperatures (both apply).
Time conversions are straightforward but essential for rate calculations and kinematics. The key is maintaining consistency when time appears in denominators of derived units.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Metric scaling | kilo- (), centi- (), milli- (), micro- () |
| Length anchors | 1 in = 2.54 cm, 1 m ≈ 3.28 ft |
| Mass anchors | 1 kg ≈ 2.2 lb, 1 amu = kg |
| Volume relationships | 1 L = 1000 cm³, 1 gal ≈ 3.785 L |
| Pressure equivalences | 1 atm = 101,325 Pa = 760 mmHg |
| Energy scales | 1 cal = 4.184 J, 1 eV = J |
| Temperature formulas | , |
| Speed relationships | 1 m/s = 3.6 km/h ≈ 2.24 mph |
Why must you cube the linear conversion factor when converting between cm³ and m³, but not when converting grams to kilograms?
A gas law problem gives pressure in mmHg and volume in liters. What conversions are needed to use SI units throughout, and why does this matter?
Compare temperature changes versus absolute temperatures: if a process raises temperature by 50°C, what is that change in Kelvin? In Fahrenheit? Why are the answers different?
You calculate a speed and get 25 m²/s. Without redoing the math, how do you know this answer is wrong?
An FRQ asks you to convert 150 lb to newtons. Explain why you can't directly use the kg-to-lb conversion without an additional step, and show the complete dimensional analysis.