Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Data scales aren't just abstract categories—they determine everything about how you can analyze your data. The scale you're working with dictates which statistical tests are valid, which measures of central tendency make sense, and what conclusions you can actually draw. Get this wrong, and you might calculate a meaningless average or run an inappropriate hypothesis test.
You're being tested on your ability to identify scales correctly and choose appropriate statistical methods based on those scales. The key concepts here are levels of measurement, permissible operations, and meaningful zero points. Don't just memorize "nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio"—know what mathematical operations each scale permits and why that matters for business decision-making.
These scales classify data into groups. The critical distinction is whether those groups have a meaningful order. Categorical data tells you what category something belongs to, not how much of something exists.
Compare: Nominal vs. Ordinal—both are categorical, but ordinal has sequence. If an exam question asks whether you can rank the categories meaningfully, that's your test. Employee ID numbers? Nominal. Employee performance ratings? Ordinal.
These scales assign numerical values where the numbers themselves carry meaning. The key distinction is whether zero means "none" or is just an arbitrary reference point.
Compare: Interval vs. Ratio—both have equal intervals, but only ratio has a true zero. The exam loves this distinction. Ask yourself: "Does zero mean the absence of the thing being measured?" If yes, it's ratio. Temperature scales? Interval. Kelvin temperature? Ratio (0K = absolute zero).
Understanding scales determines which analyses you can perform. Using the wrong statistical method for your data scale produces meaningless or misleading results.
Compare: Ordinal vs. Interval for calculating averages—many businesses calculate mean satisfaction scores (treating 1-5 ratings as interval), but technically this assumes equal spacing between ratings. Know this limitation for FRQ questions asking you to critique a statistical approach.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Nominal (categories, no order) | Gender, ZIP codes, product SKUs, payment method |
| Ordinal (categories with rank) | Satisfaction ratings, education level, income brackets |
| Interval (equal spacing, no true zero) | Temperature (°C/°F), calendar years, standardized test scores |
| Ratio (equal spacing, true zero) | Revenue, age, weight, units sold, time elapsed |
| Mode appropriate | Nominal, Ordinal, Interval, Ratio |
| Median appropriate | Ordinal, Interval, Ratio |
| Mean appropriate | Interval, Ratio |
| Ratios/percentages meaningful | Ratio only |
A survey asks customers to rate service as "Poor," "Fair," "Good," or "Excellent." What scale is this, and why would calculating a mean rating be problematic?
Which two scales permit calculating a meaningful arithmetic mean, and what property do they share that makes this possible?
Company A has in debt while Company B has in debt. Can you say Company B has "infinitely more" debt? What does this tell you about the scale of measurement?
Compare and contrast how you would analyze customer satisfaction (ordinal) versus customer spending (ratio) when looking for differences between two store locations.
A researcher converts temperature from Fahrenheit to Celsius and claims the data scale changed. Is this correct? What would need to change for the scale to become ratio?