Types of Contract Breaches

Why This Matters

Contract breaches sit at the heart of remedies analysis—and remedies questions appear on virtually every Contracts exam. You're being tested not just on whether a breach occurred, but on how severe that breach was, because severity determines what the non-breaching party can do about it. Can they walk away from the deal entirely? Are they stuck performing while suing for damages? The answer depends entirely on which type of breach you're analyzing.

The key concepts here involve timing, severity, and scope of the breaching party's failure. Understanding these distinctions lets you navigate the critical question examiners love: what remedies are available? Don't just memorize labels—know what each breach type triggers in terms of the non-breaching party's options. That's where the points are.

---

Breaches Classified by Severity

The most fundamental distinction in breach analysis is how seriously the failure undermines the contract's purpose. Severity determines whether the non-breaching party can terminate or must continue performing while seeking damages.

Material Breach

• Substantially defeats the purpose of the contract—the non-breaching party didn't receive the essential benefit they bargained for
• Triggers termination rights, allowing the aggrieved party to walk away and sue for total damages, including expectation damages
• Factors courts consider: extent of performance already rendered, likelihood of cure, adequacy of compensation, and whether breach was willful

Minor (Non-Material) Breach

• Does not defeat the contract's essential purpose—the non-breaching party still receives substantial benefit from the deal
• No termination right; the injured party must continue performing their own obligations while pursuing damages
• Damages limited to actual harm caused by the deficiency, often calculated as cost of completion or diminution in value

Fundamental Breach

• Goes to the root of the contract—so severe it essentially destroys the entire contractual relationship
• Strongest termination justification, often invoked when the breach makes further performance pointless or impossible
• Overlaps significantly with material breach but emphasizes the breach's effect on the contract's core purpose rather than just substantial performance

---

Breaches Classified by Scope

Scope addresses how much of the contractual obligation went unfulfilled. This classification often overlaps with severity but focuses specifically on the extent of non-performance.

Total Breach

• Complete failure to perform all obligations—the breaching party has done nothing or has repudiated entirely
• Discharges the non-breaching party's duties and entitles them to sue for damages covering the entire contract value
• Often synonymous with material breach in practice, though technically describes the scope rather than the impact

Partial Breach

• Some obligations performed, others not—the breaching party has done part of what they promised
• May or may not justify termination depending on whether the unperformed portion was material to the contract's purpose
• Damages measured by the shortfall, covering only the portion of performance that was deficient or missing

---

Breaches Classified by Timing

Timing matters because it determines when the non-breaching party can act. The distinction here is whether the breach has already happened or is merely anticipated.

Actual Breach

• Occurs at the moment performance is due—the breaching party has failed to perform when the contract required it
• Can be material or minor depending on the severity of the failure; timing alone doesn't determine remedy
• Triggers immediate right to remedies, though the specific remedies depend on breach classification

Anticipatory Breach (Anticipatory Repudiation)

• Occurs before performance is due—one party clearly communicates they won't perform when the time comes
• Must be unequivocal through words or conduct that definitively indicates intent not to perform; mere expressions of doubt aren't enough
• Non-breaching party has options: treat the contract as breached immediately and sue, wait for the performance date, or urge retraction of the repudiation

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A contractor completes a building but installs the wrong brand of pipes (equivalent quality, different manufacturer). Is this a material or minor breach, and what remedies are available to the property owner?

2. Compare anticipatory breach and actual breach: what must the repudiating party communicate for anticipatory breach to occur, and how does this differ from actual breach?

3. Which two breach types both allow the non-breaching party to terminate the contract and seek full expectation damages? What do they have in common?

4. A seller tells a buyer, "I'm worried I might not be able to deliver on time—things are really backed up at the warehouse." Has an anticipatory breach occurred? Why or why not?

5. If an FRQ asks you to analyze a party's remedies after the other side failed to perform, what's the first classification question you should address, and why does it matter?