Strategic Planning Models

Why This Matters

Strategic planning models aren't just theoretical frameworks—they're the analytical tools you'll use to evaluate how tax implications intersect with business decisions. On exams, you're being tested on your ability to recognize which model applies to a given scenario and, crucially, how strategic choices create tax planning opportunities, risk exposures, and timing considerations. Whether a company is deciding to enter a new market, divest a product line, or restructure operations, each decision carries tax consequences that can make or break profitability.

These models appear throughout the course because they represent the decision-making architecture businesses use before considering tax optimization. Understanding competitive positioning, resource allocation, growth strategies, and environmental scanning allows you to identify where tax planning fits into the bigger picture. Don't just memorize the components of each model—know what strategic question each one answers and how that question connects to after-tax returns.

---

External Environment Analysis

These models help businesses scan the world outside their walls. Understanding external factors is essential for tax planning because political shifts, economic conditions, and regulatory changes directly impact tax strategy.

PESTEL Analysis

• Six macro-environmental factors—Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal—provide a comprehensive external scan
• Tax legislation falls under Political and Legal factors, making this model critical for anticipating regulatory changes that affect tax planning
• Proactive adaptation to external shifts helps businesses restructure before unfavorable tax laws take effect

Porter's Five Forces Model

• Five competitive forces—threat of new entrants, supplier power, buyer power, substitutes, and rivalry—determine industry profitability potential
• Industry structure affects pricing power, which directly impacts taxable income and the feasibility of transfer pricing strategies
• Competitive advantage identification guides where to allocate resources for maximum after-tax returns

Scenario Planning

• Multiple plausible futures are mapped out to stress-test strategic decisions against uncertainty
• Tax rate changes and regulatory shifts can be modeled as scenarios, helping firms prepare contingency strategies
• Flexibility in planning allows businesses to pivot quickly when tax environments change unexpectedly

---

Internal Capability Assessment

These models turn the lens inward to evaluate what a company does well—and where it struggles. Tax strategy must align with operational realities, making internal analysis essential.

SWOT Analysis

• Four quadrants—Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats—create a snapshot of strategic position
• Internal factors (S and W) reveal whether a company has the infrastructure to execute complex tax strategies like R&D credits or international structures
• External factors (O and T) highlight tax incentives to pursue and regulatory risks to mitigate

Value Chain Analysis

• Primary and support activities are examined to find where value is created or costs can be cut
• Transfer pricing implications arise when analyzing where in the value chain profits are generated across jurisdictions
• Operational efficiency gains reduce taxable income while improving competitive positioning

McKinsey 7S Framework

• Seven interdependent elements—Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, Staff—must align for execution success
• Organizational structure directly affects tax entity choices, consolidated filing decisions, and liability exposure
• Systems alignment ensures tax compliance processes integrate with broader operational systems

---

Growth and Portfolio Strategy

These models guide decisions about where to invest, what to develop, and how to expand. Each growth path carries distinct tax implications for timing, structure, and risk.

Ansoff Matrix

• Four growth strategies—Market Penetration, Market Development, Product Development, Diversification—each with escalating risk profiles
• Diversification decisions often involve acquisitions with significant tax due diligence requirements and structure optimization
• Market expansion into new jurisdictions triggers questions about entity formation, tax treaties, and repatriation strategies

BCG Matrix

• Four portfolio categories—Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs—guide resource allocation based on market growth and share
• Divestiture of "Dogs" creates tax events including capital gains/losses and potential depreciation recapture
• Cash Cows generate stable taxable income, making them candidates for accelerated depreciation or tax credit investments

Blue Ocean Strategy

• New market creation rather than competing in crowded "red oceans" where margins are compressed
• Innovation incentives like R&D tax credits align naturally with blue ocean product development
• First-mover advantages may include favorable tax treatment in emerging industries or special economic zones

---

Performance Management and Alignment

These models ensure strategy gets executed and measured. Tax considerations must be embedded in performance metrics and organizational design.

Balanced Scorecard

• Four perspectives—Financial, Customer, Internal Processes, Learning & Growth—translate strategy into measurable objectives
• Financial perspective should include after-tax metrics like effective tax rate and after-tax ROI to capture true performance
• Alignment of activities ensures tax planning isn't siloed but integrated into operational and strategic goals

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two models both analyze external factors but differ in their time orientation (current vs. future)? What tax planning scenario would favor each?

2. A multinational is evaluating where profits are generated across its operations to optimize transfer pricing. Which model provides the most useful framework, and why?

3. Compare and contrast how the Ansoff Matrix and BCG Matrix would inform a company's decision to divest a struggling product line. What tax considerations arise from each perspective?

4. If an FRQ presents a company considering expansion into a foreign market, which models would you use to analyze (a) the external environment and (b) the appropriate growth strategy? How do tax treaties factor in?

5. A company wants to ensure its tax department's goals align with overall corporate strategy. Which model best addresses this alignment challenge, and what specific element or perspective would you focus on?