Strategic Management Process Steps

Why This Matters

The strategic management process isn't just a checklist—it's the framework that separates organizations that thrive from those that merely survive. You're being tested on your ability to understand how each step connects to the others, why sequence matters, and what happens when organizations skip or poorly execute any phase. Exam questions frequently ask you to diagnose strategic failures, recommend process improvements, or explain how environmental changes should trigger specific strategic responses.

Think of these steps as forming a continuous cycle rather than a linear path. The underlying principles here include environmental fit, strategic alignment, resource optimization, and feedback-driven adaptation. Don't just memorize the steps—know what function each serves, how they interact, and which analytical tools belong where. When you see an FRQ scenario describing an organization's struggles, your job is to identify which process step broke down and why.

---

Foundation Setting: Defining Purpose and Direction

Before any analysis or action, organizations must establish their fundamental identity and aspirations. This foundation phase creates the criteria against which all subsequent strategic decisions will be evaluated.

Mission and Vision Statement Development

• Mission statement defines current purpose—articulates what the organization does, whom it serves, and how it creates value right now
• Vision statement projects future aspirations—describes where the organization aims to be, providing long-term direction and inspiration for stakeholders
• Together they anchor organizational culture—serving as the reference point for strategic decisions and helping employees understand how their work contributes to larger goals

Setting Organizational Objectives

• SMART criteria ensure actionable goals—objectives must be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound to drive real accountability
• Objectives translate vision into targets—bridging the gap between aspirational statements and concrete performance expectations
• Hierarchy of objectives creates alignment—corporate objectives cascade into business-unit and functional goals, ensuring everyone pulls in the same direction

---

Environmental Analysis: Understanding the Playing Field

Strategic decisions require comprehensive intelligence about both internal capabilities and external conditions. The quality of your analysis directly determines the quality of your strategy.

Environmental Scanning and Analysis

• Continuous monitoring detects emerging trends—gathering information about shifts in markets, technology, regulations, and customer behavior before competitors do
• PESTEL framework structures external assessment—systematically evaluating Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal factors
• Early warning systems prevent strategic surprise—organizations that scan effectively can respond proactively rather than reactively to environmental changes

External Analysis (Opportunities and Threats)

• Opportunities represent favorable external conditions—market gaps, technological advances, regulatory changes, or demographic shifts that the organization could exploit
• Threats signal potential external dangers—competitive moves, disruptive technologies, economic downturns, or changing customer preferences that could harm performance
• External factors exist independently of the organization—unlike internal factors, these cannot be directly controlled, only anticipated and responded to

Internal Analysis (Strengths and Weaknesses)

• Strengths are internal capabilities providing advantage—resources, competencies, processes, or assets that enable superior performance relative to competitors
• Weaknesses are internal limitations requiring attention—gaps in capabilities, resource constraints, or process inefficiencies that hinder competitive performance
• SWOT analysis integrates internal and external perspectives—combining strengths/weaknesses with opportunities/threats to identify strategic options

Competitive Analysis

• Porter's Five Forces assesses industry attractiveness—evaluating supplier power, buyer power, competitive rivalry, threat of substitutes, and threat of new entrants
• Competitor profiling reveals strategic positioning—understanding rivals' strengths, weaknesses, strategies, and likely responses to your moves
• Competitive advantage requires differentiation—analysis should identify where the organization can create unique value or achieve cost leadership

---

Strategy Development: Choosing the Path Forward

With analysis complete, organizations must synthesize insights into coherent strategic choices. Formulation is where analytical rigor meets creative thinking about future possibilities.

Strategy Formulation

• Strategic options emerge from analysis—matching internal strengths to external opportunities while addressing weaknesses and mitigating threats
• Selection requires trade-offs—choosing one strategic direction means foregoing others, so decisions must align with mission, vision, and values
• Three levels of strategy require integration—corporate strategy (what businesses to be in), business strategy (how to compete), and functional strategy (how to support) must work together

---

Strategy Execution: Making It Happen

Even brilliant strategies fail without effective implementation. Execution requires translating strategic intent into operational reality through people, processes, and resources.

Strategy Implementation

• Action plans operationalize strategy—breaking down strategic objectives into specific initiatives, timelines, and responsibilities
• Communication ensures organizational buy-in—people at all levels must understand the strategy and their role in executing it
• Coordination aligns moving parts—synchronizing activities across functions, business units, and geographic locations to prevent fragmentation

Resource Allocation

• Resources must follow strategy—financial, human, and technological resources should be distributed based on strategic priorities, not historical patterns
• Trade-offs are inevitable—limited resources require difficult decisions about where to invest and where to divest
• Misallocation undermines execution—even sound strategies fail when resources flow to low-priority activities or legacy commitments

Organizational Structure Alignment

• Structure should support strategy—reporting relationships, decision rights, and coordination mechanisms must enable rather than obstruct strategic execution
• Roles and responsibilities require clarity—ambiguity about who does what creates gaps and conflicts that slow implementation
• Agility demands appropriate design—structures that worked for previous strategies may not fit new strategic directions

---

Strategic Control: Staying on Course

Strategy isn't set-and-forget—it requires ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and adjustment. Control mechanisms close the loop, connecting outcomes back to the planning process.

Strategy Evaluation and Control

• Performance metrics track strategic progress—establishing benchmarks and KPIs that measure whether the strategy is achieving intended outcomes
• Deviation detection triggers investigation—when results diverge from plans, organizations must determine whether the problem is execution or strategy itself
• Corrective action maintains strategic direction—adjustments may range from minor operational tweaks to fundamental strategic pivots depending on the nature of deviations

Performance Measurement and Feedback

• Balanced metrics prevent myopia—measuring financial, customer, process, and learning dimensions provides comprehensive performance visibility
• Data collection must be systematic—reliable measurement requires consistent methodologies and timely information flows
• Feedback loops enable learning—insights from performance data should inform future environmental scanning and strategy formulation, completing the cycle

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two process steps both utilize SWOT analysis, and what distinguishes how each uses the framework's outputs?

2. If an organization has a clear strategy but employees seem confused about priorities, which implementation step most likely failed—and what would you recommend?

3. Compare and contrast environmental scanning with competitive analysis: what does each examine, and when would you prioritize one over the other?

4. A company's financial metrics look strong, but customer satisfaction is declining. Using the performance measurement concept, explain why this matters strategically and what it suggests about their measurement approach.

5. An FRQ describes a firm whose strategy made sense when formulated but now seems outdated. Which process steps should they revisit, in what order, and why does sequence matter?