Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Pricing isn't just about slapping a number on a product—it's one of the most powerful levers businesses have to capture value, shape consumer behavior, and outmaneuver competitors. You're being tested on your ability to recognize why a firm chooses a particular pricing approach and what economic principles drive that decision. Think demand elasticity, market structure, consumer surplus, and profit maximization—these concepts show up repeatedly in how businesses set and adjust prices.
The strategies below demonstrate key principles like price discrimination, market segmentation, elasticity of demand, and competitive dynamics. Don't just memorize the definitions—know what each strategy reveals about a firm's market position, cost structure, and target customers. When you see an FRQ asking about pricing decisions, you should immediately connect the strategy to its underlying economic logic.
These approaches anchor pricing decisions to production costs, ensuring firms cover expenses before earning profit. The core principle: price must exceed average total cost for long-run sustainability.
Compare: Cost-plus pricing vs. markup pricing—both are cost-anchored and straightforward, but cost-plus typically accounts for all costs while markup often applies to wholesale cost alone. If an FRQ mentions a retailer, markup is your go-to example; for manufacturers, use cost-plus.
These strategies focus on what customers are willing to pay rather than what products cost to make. The core principle: capture more consumer surplus by aligning price with perceived value.
Compare: Value-based vs. psychological pricing—both target customer perception, but value-based requires understanding what customers value, while psychological pricing manipulates how they process numbers. Use psychological pricing examples for consumer goods; value-based for B2B or luxury markets.
These opposing approaches help firms establish position in new or competitive markets. The core principle: trade off between short-term revenue and long-term market share.
Compare: Penetration vs. skimming—opposite ends of the entry strategy spectrum. Penetration sacrifices early margins for volume; skimming sacrifices volume for early margins. FRQs love asking when each is appropriate: use penetration for commodity markets with elastic demand, skimming for innovative products with inelastic early-adopter segments.
These techniques charge different prices to different customers or contexts to capture maximum willingness to pay. The core principle: segment markets to extract consumer surplus from each group.
Compare: Dynamic pricing vs. peak-load pricing—both adjust prices over time, but dynamic pricing responds to real-time conditions while peak-load follows predictable demand patterns. Peak-load is your example for utilities; dynamic pricing for airlines and Uber.
These approaches use strategic losses or combinations to drive overall profitability. The core principle: optimize total revenue across products rather than maximizing each item individually.
Compare: Bundle pricing vs. loss leader pricing—both sacrifice margin on some items, but bundles package products together while loss leaders stand alone to drive traffic. Use bundle pricing for software and media; loss leaders for grocery and retail examples.
These strategies prioritize customer relationships and recurring revenue over one-time transactions. The core principle: reduce customer acquisition costs and increase lifetime value through ongoing engagement.
Compare: Subscription vs. freemium—both generate recurring revenue, but subscriptions charge everyone while freemium segments users by willingness to pay. Freemium works when marginal cost of free users is near zero; subscriptions work when all users require significant ongoing service.
This approach directly ties pricing decisions to competitor behavior. The core principle: maintain market position by matching or strategically undercutting rivals.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Cost-anchored pricing | Cost-plus, Markup |
| Capturing consumer surplus | Value-based, Price discrimination |
| Market entry trade-offs | Penetration, Skimming |
| Time-based price variation | Dynamic, Peak-load |
| Psychological influence | Psychological pricing, Bundle pricing |
| Traffic and conversion drivers | Loss leader, Freemium |
| Recurring revenue models | Subscription, Freemium |
| Competitive dynamics | Competitive pricing, Dynamic pricing |
A new tech startup launches an innovative smartphone at , planning to lower the price over time. Which strategy is this, and what demand condition makes it viable?
Compare penetration pricing and skimming pricing: under what market conditions would you recommend each, and what are the risks of choosing wrong?
A grocery store sells milk below cost every week. What strategy is this, and how does the store remain profitable despite the loss?
Both dynamic pricing and peak-load pricing adjust prices over time. What distinguishes them, and which industries typically use each?
An FRQ asks you to explain how a firm can increase profits without changing its product. Identify three pricing strategies that capture more consumer surplus and explain the mechanism behind each.